Child Abused and Child neglect

Teresa40

sowk_4299_syllabus_appendix2.docx

Home >Social Science homework help >Sociology homework help >Child Abused and Child neglect

Assignment #1 Problem Identification (100 points)

Dimension

Satisfactory

Developing

Definition of Problem

(15 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the definition of the problem (5 points each):

· Defined the problem by convincing the reader there is a legitimate problem

· Described the general impact on people and/or systems

· Cited research and literature that supports the explanation of the problem (as opposed to simply describing the student’s perception of the problem)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 5 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Scope of the Problem

(20 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the scope of the problem (5 points each):

· Succinctly explained or defined the root causes of the problem

· Described the incidence and prevalence of the problem & clearly labeled the micro, mezzo, and macro levels

· Cited at least 2-3 hard data sources from a variety of sources (e.g., international, federal, state, local agencies, pertinent foundations, etc.)

· Cited 2-3 scholarly articles from a variety of sources (e.g., international, federal, state, local agencies, pertinent foundations, etc.)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 5 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Consequences of the Problem

(15 points)

The student has critically addressed all of the following requirements related to the consequences of the problem (5 points each):

· Discussed real-world social costs of the problem (e.g., physical & mental health; stability & sustainability of community; environmental concerns; etc.) to the people and/or communities involved

· Discussed real-world financial costs of the problem to the people and/or communities involved

· Cited literature from at least 3 of the following sources that supports the arguments above:

· Government

· Agency

· Foundation Reports

· Scholarly Articles

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 5 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Conclusion

(5 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements in the Conclusion section (2.5 points):

· Defended the relevance of problem to social work practice by addressing social work values and ethics

· Concluded the paper with a sentence that led the reader to want to know more about the historical context and social construction of the problem

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 2.5 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Quality in Organization & Selection of Sources

(30 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to organization and professionalism in writing (6 points each):

· Organization of argument was logical

· Selected sources for paper were relevant

· The reliability of sources was critiqued (e.g., discusses exceptions, addressed issues related to cultural difference, identified potential flaws in research methods, etc.)

· The justification of the topic selection was compelling and connects data with real-world situations

· The paper did not digress into unnecessary historical or clinical analysis

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 6 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Technical Requirements

(15 points)

The student has addressed all of the following technical requirements (3 points each):

· Length of paper is 2-3 pages, double spaced

· Assignment was submitted by the due date

· Document used grammar and mechanics of style that are consistent with APA formatting (see Chapters 3 and 4 of the APA manual)

· Included a separate Reference page that is formatted using APA citation guidelines

· References were current (i.e., published after 2000), and some hard data was integrated.

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 3 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Assignment #2 Historical Analysis of Social Problem (100 points)

Dimension

Satisfactory

Developing

Analysis of the Problem

(15 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to analysis of the problem (3 points each):

· Analyzed the historical understanding of the problem

· Described how the problem has been viewed at different points along its timeline

· Identified key examples of interventions at the micro-, mezzo-, and macro-levels (levels clearly labeled)

· Discussed the significance of changes in intervention or policy strategies (if any)

· Cited at least 3 credible sources of evidence that supported the position

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 3 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Social Construction of the Problem

(20 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to considerations of social construction of the problem (4 points each):

· Analyzed how the problem is influenced by themes of power, privilege, and oppression based on cited material

· Analyzed the impact of important identity factors (e.g., SES, race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identification, ageism, classism, imperialism, etc.)

· Applied at least 2 critical and/or community theories as they related to the problem.

· Cited at least 2 concepts and/or theories covered in the seminar (e.g., articles and peer reviewed sources on cultural humility, power, social justice frameworks and systems, ecological perspectives, critical perspectives, etc.)

· Cited at least 2 credible sources of evidence that supported the position

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 4 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Stakeholders

(20 points)

The student has critically addressed all of the following requirements related to the stakeholders (4 points each):

· Identified who is negatively impacted by the problem (i.e., who suffers)

· Identified who is positively impacted by the problem (i.e. who benefits)

· Analyzed any disproportionality and/or disparities related to the problem that impact certain populations

· Analyzed issues of power, privilege, and oppression using Kivel’s analysis of social work’s role or critical theory that applies

· Cited at least 2 sources to support the position

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 4 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Values, Assumptions, & Perspectives

(15 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the values, assumptions, and/or perspectives (3 points):

· Described how the problem has been characterized by different players

· Described the role values and perspectives play in interpreting and engaging the problem.

· Analyzed the values, assumptions, and/or perspectives that may influence how the problem is interpreted and engaged

· Described the role(s) a social worker might hold in interventions.

· Cited at least 2 sources (as opposed to personal opinion) that supported the position

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 3 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Ideology & Theory

(5 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the ideological/theoretical perspectives framing the issues (1 point):

· Identified ideological views that are dominant in the approach to the problem

· Identified at least 1 relevant descriptive theory found in research,

· Identified impact of ideological bias in framing the problem or interventions.

· Assessed relationships among:

· relevant descriptive theories,

· social work practice, and

· social work interventions

· Cited at least 1 source that supported the position of this ideological relationship within the social problem

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 1 point for each criterion that is not addressed)

Quality in Organization & Selection of Sources

(10 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to organization and professionalism in writing (2.5 points each):

· Organization of argument is logical and succinct

· Selected sources for paper are relevant

· The reliability of sources is critiqued (e.g., discusses exceptions, addressed issues related to cultural difference, identified potential bias in research methods, etc.)

· Gaps in the perspectives, approaches, and policies which have been employed to address this problem are analyzed

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 2.5 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Technical Requirements

(5 points)

The student has addressed all of the following technical requirements (1 point each):

· Length of document is 3-4 pages, double spaced

· Assignment was submitted by the deadline

· Document uses grammar & mechanics of style consistent with APA formatting (see Chapters 3 & 4 of the APA manual)

· Includes a separate Reference page that is formatted using APA citation guidelines

· References are current (i.e., published after 2000)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 1 point for each criterion that is not addressed)

Assignment #3: Peer Review Guidelines for Discussion on Best Practices

Please refer to the Peer Review Guidelines provided by the University Writing Center for tips on how to communicate effectively during the peer review process. Below you will see the prompts for the Best Practices section of the paper (in blue) followed by some questions to help you give specific feedback to your peer.

Questions/notes for the peer review:

1) Does the student’s paper analyze current practice models that address the problem?

i) What are the years of the studies being used?

ii) Does the paper analyze the models, by looking critically at pieces of the model or does the paper mainly communicate what the model is intended to do without critique?

(1) In any critique or analysis of the models, does the student use source material to assist with the critique? * (see point 3 below)

(2) If the student is simply offering an opinion, see if there is a way to change the opinion into a well worded question. (Point out or highlight any areas that you see as opinion without support from research and suggest possible questions instead of opinions).

2) Have the key vulnerable populations affected by this problem suggested solutions?

a) Does the paper include evidence that the models have been built with input from the impacted population?

1. What examples do you see of input from the population?

b) If not,

1. Does the paper include a question or note that indicates that the participants could be more involved in the evaluation of it?

a. Note here how the writer has commented on the population’s involvement in the model:

3) *Find at least 2 sources from the literature that discuss best practice models addressing the social problem & analyze their efficacy.

a) These sources should assist in the critique of the models or in discussing their efficacy/value. (Sometimes the systematic review or meta-analysis studies can assist in giving credibility because they look at a lot of data and a lot of studies.)

b) What ideas did the author use to critique the model (s)?

c) Name the authors the writer used to support the critique of the best practices:

d) Examples from actual agencies or from programs are also acceptable in addition to the research.

(1) Does the paper show an example that helps the reader clearly understand how the model/intervention works? (meaning, can the reader understand it simply?)

(2) If there are examples from an agency or program, are they clearly cited?

4) Include questions that arise & research that indicates improvements or combinations of models to better address the issue.

a. Does the paper name the gaps in these models? [These gaps will likely be the key to any new recommendations in the later section of the paper.]

b. Name the examples the writer used to show gaps in the models:

5) Identify practice examples at the micro, mezzo, & macro levels of the problem.

i) Often students forget one of the levels in this section; as a reader, can you clearly see the way this problem has been addressed—indicate what the author said at each level:

(1) directly at the micro level?

(2) Administratively or in terms of regulatory actions at the mezzo?

(3) Politically or in terms of advocacy and funding or public perception at the macro?

8. Finally, just discuss what you liked, what was clear, and what some of your questions are? Help your peer write a clear section that is informative and well researched.

Assignment #4 - Application to Social Work and Recommendations (100 points)

Dimension

Satisfactory

Developing

Existing Responses to Problem

(16 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the gap between the ideal and actual situation (4 points each):

· Described existing research and theories that have attempted to respond to the problem

· Described ways in which policies, programs, or community organizing efforts demonstrate evidence of dominant bias or marginalize affected populations

· Analyzed the implications for vulnerable or marginalized populations (e.g., costs, access, etc.)

· Cited at least 2 sources that address responses to the population and/or implications for vulnerable populations

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 4 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Gap Analysis

(16 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the gap between the ideal and actual situation (4 points each):

· Identified the ideal solution

· Identified the actual situation

· Analyzed the gap between the ideal and actual situation

· Cited at least 3 sources that supported the gap analysis including micro, mezzo, and macro levels

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 4 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Social Worker’s Role

(28 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the definition of the problem (4 points each):

· Analyzed the importance for social workers’ role in addressing the problem based on previous analysis of problem and impacted stakeholders

· Determined the feasibility for social workers to address the problem

· Analyzed social work ethical concerns should the problem not be addressed

· Critiqued the role of social work values and ethics in assessing necessary changes in practice

· Described any ways in which social work is resistant to closing the gap specified above

· Referenced the NASW social work values (with an emphasis on social justice)

· Cited literature that specifically critiqued or discussed the role of social work in the context (e.g., the NASW Cultural Competence Standards and the Grand Challenges information)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 4 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Advocacy Steps

(16 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements in the Advocacy Steps section (4 points):

· Recommended advocacy steps for social workers in addressing the problem at the micro-, mezzo-, and macro levels

· Described the rationale for recommending the proposed steps

· Justified recommendations based on a literature search

· Cited at least 3 sources that have addressed best practices or recommended advocacy/action steps

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 4 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Quality in Organization & Selection of Sources

(12 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to organization and professionalism in writing (3 points each):

· Organization of argument was logical

· Selected sources for paper were relevant

· The reliability of sources was critiqued (e.g., discusses exceptions, addressed issues related to cultural difference, identified potential bias in research methods, etc.)

· The justification of the topic selection was compelling and connects data with real-world situations

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 3 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Technical Requirements

(12 points)

The student has addressed all of the following technical requirements (3 points each):

· Length of paper was approximately 3-4 pages, double spaced

· Assignment was submitted by the deadline or instructor negotiated deadline

· Document used grammar and mechanics of style that are consistent with APA formatting (see Chapters 3 and 4 of the APA manual)

· References were current (i.e., published after 2000)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 3points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Assignment #5 Social Problem Paper – Final Version (100 points)

Dimension

Satisfactory

Developing

Introduction

(8 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the Introduction section (2 points each):

· Briefly stated the problem or issue

· Briefly stated the question or ideas to be explored

· Described the relevance of the topic to social work and social justice

· Cited source material in introducing the idea

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 2 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Problem Identification

(5 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the scope of the problem (5 points each):

· Summarized problem based on the rubric criteria in Assignment #1. (Refer to the following dimensions: Definition of Problem, Scope of the Problem, Consequences of the Problem, Conclusion)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (After reviewing the criteria, the instructor may provide partial credit)

Historical Analysis & Theory

(6 points)

The student has critically addressed all of the following requirements related to the consequences of the problem (6 points each):

· Summarized the historical and theory analysis based on the rubric criteria in Assignment #2. (Refer to the following dimensions: Analysis of the Problem; Social Construction of the Problem; Stakeholders; Values, Assumptions, & Perspectives; Ideology & Theory)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (After reviewing the criteria, the instructor may provide partial credit)

Best Community Practice Models

(5 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements in the Best Community Practice Models section (2.5 points):

· Summarized the best community practice models based on the rubric criteria in Assignment #3

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (After reviewing the criteria, the instructor may provide partial credit)

Application to Social Work & Recommendations

(5 points)l

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements in the Application to Social Work and Recommendations section:

· Summarized the application to social work and recommendations based on the rubric criteria in Assignment #4

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (After reviewing the criteria, the instructor may provide partial credit)

Summary

(3 points)

The student has addressed all of the following requirements related to the Summary section (1 point each):

· Summarized the key points (and sources) presented in the papers

· Restated the problem and impact, the call to action for social work, points of access or new ideas presented to address the issue

· Summarized any gaps or limitations in the paper or research that could use further investigation

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 1 point for each criterion that is not addressed)

References

(14 points)

The student has addressed all of the following requirements related to the References (2 points each):

· Selected sources for paper are relevant

· The reliability of sources was critiqued (e.g., discusses exceptions, addressed issues related to cultural difference, identified potential flaws in research methods, etc.)

· Research on the social problem included a minimum of 8 sources from peer-reviewed journals that described the social problem and professional responses to the issues

· At least 6 references were current (i.e., published after 2016)

· At least 2 references were systematic review that covers historical (or older) articles and research

· All sources of information (including statistical data and information on programs) were cited and referenced

· Included a separate Reference page that was formatted using APA citation guidelines

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 2 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Revisions Based on Feedback

(40 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following revision requirements (10 points each):

· Made revisions based on the problem identification feedback given in an earlier iteration of the assignment

· Made revisions based on the historical analysis & theory feedback given in an earlier iteration of the assignment

· Made revisions based on the best community practice models feedback given in an earlier iteration of the assignment

· Made revisions based on the application to social work & recommendations feedback given in an earlier iteration of the assignment

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 10 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Quality in Organization & Selection of Sources

(6 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to organization and professionalism in writing (2 points each):

· Organization of paper and argument was logical

· The justification of the topic selection was compelling and connects data with real-world situations

· The paper did not digress into unnecessary historical or clinical analysis

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 2 points for each criterion that is not addressed)

Technical Requirements

(8 points)

The student has addressed all of the following technical requirements (2 points each):

· Length of the analysis was approximately 12-14 pages, double spaced

· Paper included all seven required section headings (Introduction, Problem Identification, Historical Analysis and Theory, Best Community Practice Models, Application to Social Work and Recommendations, Summary, and References)

· Assignment was submitted by the deadline

· Document used grammar and mechanics of style that are consistent with APA formatting (see Chapters 3 and 4 of the APA manual)

The student has partially addressed the criteria listed in the Satisfactory column (Deduct 2 point for each criterion that is not addressed)

Assignment #6 Field Readiness Self-Assessment and Instructor Assessment

READINESS FOR FIELD SELF-ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

Name _________________________

Date __________________________

I. Professional Behavior

The following statements reflect your capacity to demonstrate professional behavior. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with each statement by indicating Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree, using the abbreviations SA, A, N, D, SD.

A. Ability handle competing responsibilities:

I always follow through with commitments	SA, A, N, D, SD
I always adhere to instructions	SA, A, N, D, SD
I am always able to modify plans	SA, A, N, D, SD

B. I always understand and apply feedback SA, A, N, D, SD

II. Ethical Conduct & Integrity

The following statements reflect your capacity to demonstrate ethical conduct and integrity. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with each statement by indicating Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree.

A. I am always honest in communicating significant information

SA, A, N, D, SD

B. I always demonstrate a willingness to engage diverse experiences and perspectives

SA, A, N, D, SD

III. Interpersonal Communication Skills & Empathy

The following statements reflect your capacity to demonstrate effective interpersonal communication skills and empathy. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with each statement by indicating Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree.

A. Clear Communication

I am always an effective verbal communicator SA, A, N, D, SD

I am always an effective written communicator SA, A, N, D, SD

I am always an effective listener SA, A, N, D, SD

I am always an effective non-verbal (congruence) communicator SA, A, N, D, SD

B. Demonstrate capacity for:

I always demonstrate capacity for emotional/affective regulation SA, A, N, D, SD

I always demonstrate capacity for cultural responsiveness (cultural humility) SA, A, N, D, SD

I always demonstrate capacity for developing empathetic relationships SA, A, N, D, SD

IV. Self-Awareness and Reflective Thinking

The following statements reflect your capacity to demonstrate self-awareness and reflective thinking that impact practice. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with each statement by indicating Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree.

A. I always demonstrate an openness to learning SA, A, N, D, SD

B. Awareness of and willingness

I always demonstrate an awareness and willingness to examine and address beliefs, judgments, and values

SA, A, N, D, SD

I always demonstrate an awareness and willingness to examine and address personal history

SA, A, N, D, SD

Comments

Please explain any ratings that are Neutral, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree. If you have any additional comments or concerns you would like to discuss, please address them here.

Otherwise, type "N/A".

Instructor Assessment:

GSSW Field Readiness Assessment

Student name: ______________________________ Field Coordinator name: _____________________________ Date and type of first contact: _______________________

☐ Foundation ☐Concentration ☐Advanced Standing

☐ Phone ☐ Email ☐ In person

Demonstrates Capacity for Professional Behavior		Concerns about Capacity for Professional Behavior				Date / Type of Contact / Comment:
Ability to handle competing responsibilities:		Difficulty handling competing responsibilities:
· Follows through with commitments	[0]	· Has missed meetings	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Adheres to instructions	[0]	· Has required repeated instructions	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Able to modify plans	[0]	· Resistant to modifying plans	[1]	[2]	[3]

Understands and applies feedback	[0]	Difficulty understanding and applying feedback	[1]	[2]	[3]

Demonstrates Ethical Conduct & Integrity		Concerns about Ethical Conduct & Integrity
Honestly communicates significant information	[0]	Has withheld significant information	[1]	[2]	[3]
Demonstrates willingness to engage diverse experiences & perspectives	[0]	Demonstrates resistance to engage diverse experiences & perspectives	[1]	[2]	[3]

Demonstrates Effective Interpersonal Communication Skills & Empathy		Concerns about Interpersonal Communication Skills & Empathy
Communicates clearly:		Difficulty communicating clearly:
· Verbal	[0]	· Verbal	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Written	[0]	· Written	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Listening	[0]	· Listening	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Non-verbal (congruence)	[0]	· Non-verbal (incongruence)	[1]	[2]	[3]
Demonstrates capacity for:		Concerns regarding:
· Emotional/affective regulation	[0]	· Emotional/affective regulation	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Cultural Responsiveness (cultural humility)	[0]	· Cultural Responsiveness (micro aggressions)	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Developing empathetic relationships	[0]	· Developing empathetic relationships	[1]	[2]	[3]

Demonstrates Self-Awareness & Reflective Thinking that Impact Practice		Concerns about Self-Awareness & Reflective Thinking that Impact Practice
Demonstrates openness to learning	[0]	Demonstrates resistance to learning	[1]	[2]	[3]
Awareness of & willingness to examine & address:		Unaware of &/or unwilling to examine &/or address:
· Beliefs & judgments & values	[0]	· Beliefs & judgments & values	[1]	[2]	[3]
· Personal history	[0]	· Personal history ☐ DO NOT RECOMMEND FOR FIELD Date: _________	[1]	[2]	[3]
Key: [0] No evidence for concern [1] Need for watchful waiting/monitoring [2] Need for strategizing with team/possible action [3] Requires timely team consultation/plan

Assignment #1

Problem Identification (100 points)

Dimension

Satisfactory

Developing

Definition of

Problem

(15 points)

The

student

has

clearly

addressed

all

the

following

requirements

the

definition

the

problem

points

each)

Defined

the proble

convinc

ing

the reader there is a legitimate problem

Described

the general

impact

people and/or systems

Cited r

esearc

and literature

that supports the explanation of the problem

(

as opposed to

simply

describing

the

student’s perception of

the problem)

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Scope of the

Problem

(20 points)

The

student

has

clearly

addressed

all

the

following

requirements

the

scope

the

problem

(

points

each)

Succinctly e

xplained or defined the

root causes of the problem

Described the

incidence and prevalence

of the problem

& clearly labeled

the micro, mezzo, and macro levels

Cited

at least

3 h

ard data sources

from

a variety of sources (e.g., i

nternationa

l, f

ederal

, s

tate

, local

agencies,

pertinent

foundations, etc.)

Cited 2

3 scholarly articles

from

a variety of sources (e.g., international, federal, state, local agencies,

pertinent

foundations, etc.)

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (

Deduct

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Consequence

of the Problem

(15 points)

The

student

has

critically

addressed

all

the

followi

requirements

the

consequences

the

proble

(

points

each):

Discussed

real

world

social cost

of the

problem

(e.g., physical & mental health; stability & sustainability of

community; environmental concerns; etc.

)

to the people and/or communities involved

Discussed

real

world

financial cost

of the problem to the people and/or communities involved

Cited literature

from

at least

of the following sources

that supports the arguments above

Government

Agency

Foundation Reports

Scholarly Articles

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (

Deduct 5

points

for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Conclusion

(5 points)

The

student

has

clearly

addressed

all

the

followin

requirements

the

Conclusion

section

(2.

points)

Defended

the

relevance of problem to social work practice by addressing

social work values and ethics

Concluded the paper with a sentence that led the reader to want to know more about the historical

context

and social construction of the problem

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column

(Deduc

points

for each criterion that is not

addressed

)

Quality

Organization &

Selection of

Sources

(

points)

The

student

has

clearly

addressed

all

following

requirements

organization

and

professionalism

writing

(

points

each):

Organization of argument

was

logical

Selected sources for paper

were

relevant

The

reliability of sources

was

critiqued (e.g.,

discusses exceptions,

address

issues related to cultural

difference,

identified

potential flaws in research methods, etc.)

The justification of the topic selection

was

compelling and connects data with real

world situations

The paper

not digress into unnecessary historical

or clinical

ana

ysis

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (

Deduct

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Technical

Requirements

(15 points)

The

student

has

addressed

all

the

following

technical

requirements

points

each)

Length of

paper is 2

3 page

, double spaced

Assignment

was

submitted

by the due date

Document

used

grammar and mechanics of style that are consistent with APA formatting (see Chapters 3

and 4 of the APA manual)

Include

a separate Reference page

that is

formatted using APA citation guidelines

References

were

current

(i.e., published after 20

)

, and some hard data was integrated.

The stu

dent has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct 3

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Assignment #1 Problem Identification (100 points)

Dimension Satisfactory Developing

Definition of

Problem

(15 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the definition of the problem (5

points each):

 Defined the problem by convincing the reader there is a legitimate problem

 Described the general impact on people and/or systems

 Cited research and literature that supports the explanation of the problem (as opposed to simply describing

the student’s perception of the problem)

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct 5

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Scope of the

Problem

(20 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to the scope of the problem (5 points

each):

 Succinctly explained or defined the root causes of the problem

 Described the incidence and prevalence of the problem & clearly labeled the micro, mezzo, and macro levels

 Cited at least 2-3 hard data sources from a variety of sources (e.g., international, federal, state, local

agencies, pertinent foundations, etc.)

 Cited 2-3 scholarly articles from a variety of sources (e.g., international, federal, state, local agencies,

pertinent foundations, etc.)

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct 5

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Consequences

of the Problem

(15 points)

The student has critically addressed all of the following requirements related to the consequences of the problem

(5 points each):

 Discussed real-world social costs of the problem (e.g., physical & mental health; stability & sustainability of

community; environmental concerns; etc.) to the people and/or communities involved

 Discussed real-world financial costs of the problem to the people and/or communities involved

 Cited literature from at least 3 of the following sources that supports the arguments above:

o Government

o Agency

o Foundation Reports

o Scholarly Articles

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct 5

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Conclusion

(5 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements in the Conclusion section (2.5 points):

 Defended the relevance of problem to social work practice by addressing social work values and ethics

 Concluded the paper with a sentence that led the reader to want to know more about the historical context

and social construction of the problem

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct 2.5

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Quality in

Organization &

Selection of

Sources

(30 points)

The student has clearly addressed all of the following requirements related to organization and professionalism in

writing (6 points each):

 Organization of argument was logical

 Selected sources for paper were relevant

 The reliability of sources was critiqued (e.g., discusses exceptions, addressed issues related to cultural

difference, identified potential flaws in research methods, etc.)

 The justification of the topic selection was compelling and connects data with real-world situations

 The paper did not digress into unnecessary historical or clinical analysis

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct 6

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)

Technical

Requirements

(15 points)

The student has addressed all of the following technical requirements (3 points each):

 Length of paper is 2-3 pages, double spaced

 Assignment was submitted by the due date

 Document used grammar and mechanics of style that are consistent with APA formatting (see Chapters 3

and 4 of the APA manual)

 Included a separate Reference page that is formatted using APA citation guidelines

 References were current (i.e., published after 2000), and some hard data was integrated.

The student has partially

addressed the criteria listed in the

Satisfactory column (Deduct 3

points for each criterion that is not

addressed)