Linguistic grammar homework.

paiocanlie2727
slidesch5b.ppt

Chapter 5: Form & Meaning of Verbs

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

IV. Future Tense and Modals

V. Infinitives

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning:

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

  • Form does not always correspond exactly to meaning.

1. One form may have two meanings

2. One meaning may have two forms.

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

  • Form does not always correspond exactly to meaning.

1. One form may have two meanings

Example #1: Unmarked Habitual aspect in some dialects of English:

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

  • Form does not always correspond exactly to meaning.

1. One form may have two meanings:

Habitual aspect

-- She is (usually/often) late. (habitual: form: is)

-- Today she is late. (singular: form: is)

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

  • Form does not always correspond exactly to meaning.

This is a dialectal phenomenon. In African American English, two forms have distinct meanings:

-- She be late. (=she is usually late.) Habitual

-- She late. (=she is late right now.)

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

  • Form does not always correspond exactly to meaning.

One form, two meanings:

Present tense: present/ future meaning:

Mary likes baseball.

Mary leaves at seven. (future event)

Who is playing at the Paramount next week? (future event)

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

  • Example #3: one meaning, two forms: progressive (Spanish)

1) Juan lee el diario.

(Form: pres. tense, umarked aspect)

Juan reads the newspaper. ( = he is reading it)

2) Juan está leyendo el diario.

(Form: Pres. tense prog. aspect)

Juan is reading the newspaper.

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

  • Why do form and meaning not converge?
  • One form may have a range of meanings. Other clues help the speaker decide among the meanings.

III. Semantic Tense and Aspect

Form versus Meaning

  • Summary
  • Form is not always equivalent to one unique meaning:
  • 1. forms may have a range of meanings
  • 2. a form may not exist one one dialect (or language)

IV. Future Tense and Modals

A. Future tense: A syntactic tense, not a morphological tense.

  • Morphological: usually, using an affix
  • Syntactic: using a specific sequence of words

IV. Future Tense and Modals

A. Future tense

  • Example:
  • Mary leaves at seven. (present tense, future meaning)
  • Mary will leave at seven. (Will+verb = syntactic future tense, future meaning)

IV. Future Tense and Modals

B. Modals

  • 1. Semantic characteristics: no “dictionary” definitions
  • 2. Concepts like volition (will), possibility etc.
  • Examples:
  • The Mayor may arrive at noon. (possibility)
  • Yes, they may leave early. (permission)

IV. Future Tense and Modals

B. Modals

  • 3. Morphological characteristics:
  • arent inflected for person, number, tense, aspect
  • Examples:
  • I sing. I may sing.
  • He sings. *He mays sing.

IV. Future Tense and Modals

B. Modals

  • 4. Semantic tense: do modals have Past/Present value? Yes
  • -Modals appear only in Finite clauses (past, present, future)
  • [ To play soccer ] is really fun.
  • *[To may play soccer] is really fun.
  • (Meaning: to be able to play soccer is a pleasure.)

IV. Future Tense and Modals

C. Summary

  • 1. Future Tense is formed ‘syntactically’ in English
  • 2. Modals are grammatical verbs
  • 3. Modals are not inflected for person, number, tense, or aspect.
  • 4. Modals have semantic tense.

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

A. Finite versus non-finite forms of verbs:

  • A finite verb “locates” the event in time: past/present/future
  • A non-finite verb (infinitive or participle) does NOT locate the event in time.

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

A. Finite versus infinitive forms of verbs:

Example #1:

Finite: Non-finite:

Lionel traveled to Borneo. [ To travel to Borneo] is not so simple.

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

A. Finite versus non-finite forms of verbs:

  • Example #2: sequences of verbs:

Finite: Non-finite:

  • Lionel will travel to Borneo. (to travel)
  • Lionel has traveled to Borneo.

(traveled = perf. participle)

  • Lionel is traveling to Borneo.

(traveling= prog. Participle)

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

A. Finite versus non-finite forms of verbs:

  • Diagnostic for finite verbs: two possible forms: past or present

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

B. Diagnostic for finite verbs: two possible forms: past or present

  • Examples:
  • Lionel has traveled to Borneo.
  • Lionel had traveled to Borneo.
  • (Lionel will have traveled to Borneo.)

(syntactic tense)

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

B. Diagnostic for non-finite verbs: cannot have past/present forms

  • Examples:

  • Lionel has traveled to Borneo.

(Is traveled a finite verb?

  • *Lionel has travels to Borneo.

(NO! It cannot be replaced by a tensed form.)

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

C. Types of non-finite verbs:

  • “Bare” infinitives: no affix; without to; occur after modals
  • Sue may write the proposal.
  • Kim and Allie should watch the World Cup.

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

C. Types of non-finite verbs:

  • “To-” infinitives: no affix; with to; in various subordinate clauses
  • [For José to win the race] would be great.
  • We prefer [for Mary to win].

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

C. Types of non-finite verbs:

  • Present (progressive) participles: verbs ending in -ing
  • Mary is winning the race.
  • The guard saw the thief climbing the wall.

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

C. Types of non-finite verbs:

  • “Past” (perfect) participles: forms ending in –ed/-en
  • Sue has spoken already.
  • [For the committee to have finished the project] is impressive.

V. Infinitives: no past/present/future distinction

D. Summary

1. Finite verbs have past/present (or future) forms. They can replace one another.

2. Non-finite verbs do not have past/present (or future) forms). They cannot be replaced by a past/present (or future) form.

3. Non-finite verbs can be: bare infinitives, marked (to-) infinitives, or participles.