ISS 210 Society, the Individual, & Video Games (W1)

piggy_cute
Slides-LegalStatus.pdf

ISS210 Society and the Individual: Video Games

Topic #2: Video Games and the Law

MSUVideoGames@gmail.com

Today’s Questions • What legal

protections do video games enjoy?

• How did we get there?

• Civil, constitutional, and commercial aspects

Types of Law • Criminal law

• Government (state/federal/local) decides to prosecute you for a crime (violating a law)

• You lose, you get sentenced (prison, probation, fine, etc.)

• Prosecution must establish guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt”

Types of Law • Civil Law

• Individual (person or corporation) decides to file suit against someone for an alleged harm

• You lose, you pay a fine (never go to jail)

• Liability determined by “preponderance of the evidence”

Canonical Example: OJ Simpson • October 1995:

Not guilty of murder

• February 1997: Liable for wrongful death of Ron Goldman ($33.5M damages)

Civil Law and Games • Watters v. TSR, Inc.

(1990): Manufacturer of Dungeons and Dragons did not violate a “duty of care” in publishing/ distributing the game

Liability and Video Games • James v. Meow Media, Inc. (2002) • Parents of students killed in a school

shooting sue companies who produced video games and websites

• Plaintiffs claim that these things desensitized the assailant and caused his violence

• Not liable: Companies could not foresee that this would happen, so no duty of care

Duty of Care • Foreseeability • Social utility of defendants’ actions • Magnitude of burden of guarding

against the injury or harm

• Consequences of placing burden on the defendants

Constitutional Law • First Amendment: “Congress shall

make no law…abridging the freedom of speech…”

• Supreme Court interprets the Constitution and exercises judicial review

• Gitlow v. New York (1925): First Amendment applies to laws passed by the states

Freedom of Speech • “No law” isn’t literal (for most) • Ginsberg v. New York (1968): A law prohibiting

the sale of obscene material to minors is constitutional

• What is obscenity? • Miller Test (three prongs):

• Community standards • Patently offensive conduct • Lacks any serious value

Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n (2011) • California passes a Miller-style law

aimed at violent video games

• Must be 18 or older to buy/rent (or have a parent/guardian-esq person do it for you)

Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n (2011) • Supreme Court say no dice (7-2 vote,

Justice Scalia writes opinion)

• Video games are considered protected speech under the First Amendment

• Regulation possible, but needs to be narrowly tailored to suit a compelling interest; CA law fails both of these

Commercial Aspects • Patent law: Protects

processes and machines that you invent

• Copyright law: Legal basis for protecting creative, artistic, and written works

Example: Pacman v. Munchkin

Example: Tetris v. Mino

Tetris Mino Dr. MarioDr. Mario (patented)

Example: Golden Tee vs. PGA Tour

Example: Crazy Taxi v. The Simpsons: Road Rage

More Commercial: Right of Publicity • Famous people have the right to

control commercial use of their likeness

• Significant disagreement among courts as to how much is allowed and what “test” to use

• Supreme Court has not resolved these legal conflicts and appears uninterested in doing so

Davis v. Electronic Arts • Sequel case to Keller v. EA (2013) • Keller = NCAA football players

have right to their likeness

• Davis = So do NFL players (historic players not licensed)

• Denied review by Supreme Court in March 2016

Other Examples

Ellen Page (The Last of Us)

Other Examples

Lindsay Lohan (Grand Theft Auto V)

Other Examples

Manuel Noriega (Call of Duty: Black Ops 2)

Summary • Today: Video games and law • Readings

• Assorted newspaper articles about Brown v. Entertainment Merchants

• Incredible Technologies v. Virtual Technologies

• Next Time: Good or bad for you?