Self Reflection

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 70%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Assignment Content

27 to 30 points

Meets the minimum page length requirement of 5 pages Meets the minimum requirement of 5 appropriate sources. Thoroughly addresses all 6 topic areas: Ethics, Human Growth & Development, Counseling Theories, Counseling Skills, Reflection and Action Plan, and Biblical Worldview.

21 to 26 points

Meets the minimum page length requirement of 5 pages Meets the minimum requirement of 5 appropriate sources. Addressed all 6 topic areas including Ethics, Human Growth & Development, Counseling Theories, Counseling Skills, Reflection and Action Plan, and Biblical Worldview. 1 or 2 of these topics may not be thoroughly addressed.

1 to 20 points

May not meet the required page length requirement of 5 pages May not have a minimum of 5 appropriate source, 1 or 2 topics are missing from the content There may be 1 or 2 topics that are not adequately covered.

0 points

The paper does not meet the page length requirements. The paper does not have appropriate sources. There are 3 or more missing topics and the topics addressed are not adequately covered.

Quality of Self-Reflection

30 to 35 points

The self-reflection is clear, logical, and uses complete sentences. The student identifies and discusses the major points clearly. The ideas and concepts are thoroughly developed and substantive.

23 to 29 points

Most of the paper is clear, logical, and flows. Most of the points are identified clearly. The ideas and concepts are mostly developed and mostly substantive.

1 to 22 points

The student may struggle to write clearly, logically, and thoughts may be incomplete. The student may struggle to clearly discuss key points. The paper lacks substantive ideas and concepts.

0 points

The paper is not clear or logical and there are incomplete ideas and points are not clearly identified. There does not seem to be value or meaning in the self-reflection. Ideas and concepts are overlooked.

Interaction and Evaluation

35 to 40 points

The student demonstrates self-awareness. The paper demonstrates the student's engagement in the reflective learning process. The student demonstrates an honest and adequate level of self-evaluation.

30 to 34 points

The student mostly demonstrates self-awareness. The paper shows that the student is engaging in reflective learning. The student makes a very good attempt to demonstrate and honest and adequate level of self-evaluation.

1 to 29 points

The student struggles to demonstrate self-awareness. The student may not show a high level of engagement in reflective learning. The student may struggle to demonstrate and honest and adequate level of self-evaluation.

0 points

The student does not demonstrate self-awareness, reflective learning, or the ability to honestly evaluate oneself.

Structure 30%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Professionalism/

Grammar

20 points

There are no noticeable errors in grammar and spelling. Sentences are complete, clear and concise. Paragraphs are structured. The paper demonstrates exemplary writing skills.

15 to 19 points

There are only 1 or 2 noticeable errors in grammar and spelling. The paper mostly demonstrates strong writing skills.

1 to 14 points

The student struggles to demonstrate self-awareness. The student may not show a There are 3 or 4 noticeable errors in grammar and spelling. The sentences may lack clarity and conciseness. The paper does not demonstrate exemplary writing skills.

0 points

The paper has 5 or more compromising errors in grammar and syntax. The paper does not demonstrate graduate level writing skill.