Job Evaluation Method

3/24/23, 4'56 PMSelecting a Job Evaluation Method Scoring Guide

Page 1 of 1https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS-FPX/BUS-FPX4043/220700/Scoring_Guides/a03_scoring_guide.html

Selecting a Job Evaluation Method Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON- PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four job evaluation methods.

Does not identify the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four job evaluation methods.

Identifies the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four job evaluation methods.

Analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four job evaluation methods.

Analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four job evaluation methods, supported by evidence.

Describe how an employer would use external market benchmarking during the job evaluation process.

Does not identify how an employer would use external market benchmarking during the job evaluation process.

Identifies how an employer would use external market benchmarking during the job evaluation process.

Describes how an employer would use external market benchmarking during the job evaluation process.

Describes how an employer would use external market benchmarking during the job evaluation process, and provides an example of this.

Analyze which job evaluation method would be the most effective.

Does not identify which job evaluation method would be the most effective.

Identifies which job evaluation method would be the most effective.

Analyzes which job evaluation method would be the most effective.

Analyzes which job evaluation method would be the most effective. Considers whether internal comparisons of job worth only, or a combination of internal comparisons and external marketing would be used in the job evaluation. Justifies reasoning.

Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.