organization's strategic plan
4/17/23, 12:05 PM Quality Improvement Proposal Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX8010/211000/Scoring_Guides/a04_scoring_guide.html 1/2
Quality Improvement Proposal Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Explain the rationale for establishing a strategic priority.
Does not explain the rationale for establishing a strategic priority.
The rationale for establishing a strategic priority is ambiguous or unconvincing.
Explains the rationale for establishing a strategic priority.
Provides a concise and articulate explanation of the rationale for establishing a strategic priority. The rationale is well supported in the evidence-based literature and reflective of keen insight into the logical implications and consequences of the stated priority.
Present the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority.
Does not present the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority.
Presents a brief summary from a SWOT analysis that misrepresents the significance or viability of the chosen strategic priority.
Presents the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority.
Presents the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority. Key points indicate a perceptive analysis that reflects awareness and due consideration of organizational politics and strategic goals.
Identify key performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.
Does not identify performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.
Identifies performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.
Identifies key performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.
Identifies precise key performance indicators, clearly aligned with strategic priorities, for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.
Explain the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative.
Does not outline a process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative.
Outlines a process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative.
Explains the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative.
Provides a concise, articulate explanation of the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative. Presents an effective strategy for collaborating and draws well-reasoned conclusions about the value of stakeholder support.
Explain how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative.
Does not describe a contemporary change theory that could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative.
Describes a contemporary change theory that could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative.
Explains how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative.
Explains how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative. Applies an insightful interpretation of applicable theory to best practices in change leadership.
4/17/23, 12:05 PM Quality Improvement Proposal Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX8010/211000/Scoring_Guides/a04_scoring_guide.html 2/2
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Make policy recommendations to support a proposed quality improvement initiative.
Does not make policy recommendations to support a proposed quality improvement initiative.
Makes policy recommendations that overlook important political or cultural factors that would influence a quality improvement initiative.
Makes policy recommendations to support a proposed quality improvement initiative.
Makes astute policy recommendations to support a proposed quality improvement initiative. Identifies significant and relevant policy implications and provides compelling justification for policy changes.
Communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.
Does not communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.
Communication lacks clarity, conciseness, or effectiveness at conveying the intended message.
Communicates clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.
Communicates clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed. Content, form, and style are congruous, engaging, and facilitate audience comprehension. Adheres to all applicable professional, disciplinary, and scholarly communication and design standards.