Tonya's case
COMPETENCY 1
Analyze ethical issues associated with patient care from the perspectives of various health care professionals.
CRITERION
Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case.
Your result: Non-Performance
Distinguished
Demonstrates sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case, and does so with insight and original arguments
Proficient
Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case.
Basic
Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.
Non-Performance
Does not demonstrate sound ethical thinking about ethical theories and moral theories in applying them to a case.
Faculty Comments:
Keep working on developing your discussion of some of the moral theories to the situation here� we�ve learned about several different ethical and moral theories in the class and this was a great opportunity to pull those out and apply them here. As you revise, go back to the first assessment and take a look again at the matrix you did. How would the 4 theories we�ve been studying apply in the Tonya case? What would change (if anything) in the outcome / decisions made depending on the application of each of the 4 ethical theories here?
CRITERION
Explain professional codes of ethics and apply them to a specific case.
Your result: Basic
Distinguished
Explains professional codes of ethics and applies them to a specific case, and does so with insight and original arguments.
Proficient
Explains professional codes of ethics and applies them to a specific case.
Basic
Explains professional codes of ethics and applies them to a specific case, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.
Non-Performance
Does not explain professional codes of ethics and apply them to a specific case.
Faculty Comments:
One thing that would have moved your score up here is to have included evidence from specific codes of ethics (eg., your own) so as to provide textual support for the claims you�re making in the essay.
COMPETENCY 2
Explain the conceptual framework that health care leaders use to make ethical decisions.
CRITERION
Explain organizational documents like mission and value statements and use them to analyze a case study.
Your result: Basic
Distinguished
Explains organizational documents like mission and value statements and uses them to analyze a case study, and does so with insight and original arguments.
Proficient
Explains organizational documents like mission and value statements and uses them to analyze a case study.
Basic
Explains organizational documents like mission and value statements and uses them to analyze a case study, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.
Non-Performance
Does not explain organizational documents like mission and value statements and use them to analyze a case study.
Faculty Comments:
You�ve not yet explained information from these documents (eg., a mission statement or a value statement) or applied that information to this particular case study.
CRITERION
Explain the role of accrediting bodies and apply this understanding in analyzing a case study.
Your result: Basic
Distinguished
Explains the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study, and does so with insight and original arguments.
Proficient
Explains the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study
Basic
Explains the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.
Non-Performance
Does not explain the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study.
Faculty Comments:
It�s not enough to simply mention in passing that accrediting bodies in the field �agree� with you� As you revise, you�ll need to explain their role in the process of establishing ethical policies for dealing with issues such as this.
COMPETENCY 3
Apply in text the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, tone, and citation formatting.
CRITERION
Provide validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.
Your result: Proficient
Distinguished
Provides validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations flawlessly.
Proficient
Provides validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.
Basic
Provides minimal validation and support within written communications by including vaguely relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.
Non-Performance
Does not provide validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.
Faculty Comments:
You�ll want to incorporate more evidence from scholarly and professional sources here. When you add these sorts of validation and examples, make sure that you cite all sources correctly both in the body of the essay and in the list of references.
CRITERION
Produce writing with minimal errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.
Your result: Basic
Distinguished
Produces writing that is consistently superior with no errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.
Proficient
Produces writing with minimal errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.
Basic
Produces writing with some errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.
Non-Performance
Produces writing with many errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.
Faculty Comments:
I�ve noted errors in your document for you so that you know what to correct as you revise