Order 755765: One shot virus annual influenza vaccination
Marking criteria for essay questions
EQUIVALENT
TO
RANGE ESSAY SCALE
Y1 CRITERIA Y2 CRITERIA Y3 CRITERIA
Upper I 90-100 92, 95, 98 Outstanding work:
highly detailed, accurate and wide-ranging knowledge of topic
full use of learning resources
exceptional understanding of the topic
superbly organized and presented
excellent analysis and/or problem-solving
evidence of insight
Outstanding work:
exceptional understanding of the topic
highly detailed, accurate and comprehensive knowledge of the topic
wide use of learning resources with reading beyond the lectures
superbly organized and presented
excellent analysis and/or problem-solving
good level of critical evaluation
Outstanding work:
exceptional understanding of the topic
highly detailed, accurate and comprehensive knowledge of the topic
wide use of learning resources with reading beyond the lectures
superbly organized and presented
excellent analysis and/or problem-solving
very high level of critical evaluation and/or originality
Middle I 80-89 82, 85, 88 Excellent work:
detailed, accurate and wide-ranging knowledge of topic
wide use of learning resources
excellent understanding of the topic
excellent organization and presentation
excellent analysis and/or problem-solving
may be evidence of insight
Excellent work:
excellent understanding of the topic
detailed, accurate and wide-ranging knowledge of the topic
wide use of learning resources
extremely well organized and presented
excellent analysis and/or problem-solving
evidence of critical evaluation
Excellent work:
excellent understanding of the topic
detailed, accurate and wide-ranging knowledge of the topic
wide use of learning resources with reading beyond the lectures
extremely well organized and presented
excellent analysis and/or problem-solving
evidence of critical evaluation and/or originality
Lower I 70-79 72, 75, 78 Very good work:
detailed, largely accurate and thorough knowledge of topic
very good use of learning resources
very good understanding of the topic
very well organized and presented
very good analysis and/or problem-solving
may be evidence of insight
Very good work:
very good understanding of the topic
detailed, largely accurate and wide-ranging knowledge of the topic
very good use of learning resources
very well organized and presented
very good analysis and/or problem-solving
may be evidence of critical evaluation
Very good work:
very good understanding of the topic
detailed, largely accurate and wide-ranging knowledge of the topic
very good use of learning resources with reading beyond the lectures
very well organized and presented
very good analysis and/or problem-solving
usually evidence of critical evaluation and/or originality
Marking criteria for essay questions
EQUIVALENT TO
RANGE ESSAY SCALE
Y1 CRITERIA Y2 CRITERIA Y3 CRITERIA
2(i) 60-69 62, 65, 68 Good work:
generally accurate and reasonably detailed knowledge of the topic with few significant errors
good use of learning resources
sound understanding of the main points
well organized and presented
good analysis and problem-solving
little evidence of insight
Good work:
sound understanding of the main points
generally accurate and reasonably detailed knowledge of the topic; few significant errors
good use of learning resources
well organized and presented
good analysis and/or problem-solving
may be evidence of critical evaluation
Good work:
sound understanding of the main points
generally accurate and reasonably detailed knowledge of the topic; few significant errors
good use of learning resources
well organized and presented
good analysis and/or problem-solving
usually evidence of critical evaluation
2(ii) 50-59 52, 55, 58 Satisfactory work:
sound knowledge of the topic with some errors and omissions
fair but limited use of learning resources
understanding of the main points, partial understanding elsewhere
reasonably well organized and presented
fair analysis and problem-solving
no evidence of insight
Satisfactory work:
understanding of the main points, partial understanding elsewhere
sound knowledge of the topic with errors and omissions
fair but limited use of learning resources
reasonably well organized and presented
fair analysis and/or problem-solving
little or no evidence of critical evaluation
Satisfactory work:
understanding of the main points, partial understanding elsewhere
sound knowledge of the topic with errors and omissions
fair but limited use of learning resources
reasonably well organized and presented
fair analysis and/or problem-solving
little evidence of critical evaluation
3rd 40-49 42, 45, 48 Adequate work:
Some knowledge of the topic with significant errors and omissions
minimal use of learning resources
partial understanding of the main points, poor understanding elsewhere
acceptably organized and presented
not fully focused on the topic
passable analysis and problem-solving
Adequate work:
partial understanding of the main points but flaws in understanding evident
some knowledge of the topic, with significant errors and/or omissions
minimal use of learning resources
barely acceptable organization and presentation
not fully focused on the topic
passable analysis and/or problem-solving
Adequate work:
partial understanding of the main points but flaws in understanding evident
some knowledge of the topic, with significant errors and/or omissions
minimal use of learning resources
barely acceptable organization and presentation
not fully focused on the topic
passable analysis and/or problem-solving
Marking criteria for essay questions
EQUIVALENT TO
RANGE ESSAY SCALE
Y1 CRITERIA Y2 CRITERIA Y3 CRITERIA
Marginal fail 30-39 32, 35, 38 Inadequate work:
little knowledge of the topic (¼ to ⅓ of expected material) with major inaccuracies
inadequate use of learning resources
major conceptual errors
insufficient organization and presentation
partial focus on topic
inadequate analysis and/or problem-solving
Inadequate work:
limited understanding of the main points
major conceptual errors
major omissions and/or inaccuracies
weak organization and presentation
partial focus on the topic
inadequate analysis and/or problem-solving
Inadequate work:
limited understanding of the main points
major conceptual errors
major omissions and/or inaccuracies
weak organization and presentation
partial focus on the topic
inadequate analysis and/or problem-solving
Poor fail 20-29 22, 25, 28 Poor work:
information mostly irrelevant, inaccurate or missing (less than ¼ of expected material)
poor use of learning resources
widespread confusion
poor organization and presentation
little focus on topic
poor analysis and/or problem-solving
Poor work:
minimal understanding evident
profound conceptual errors
information mostly irrelevant and/or inaccurate
weak organization and presentation
failure to properly address topic
poor analysis and/or problem-solving
Poor work:
minimal understanding evident
profound conceptual errors
information mostly irrelevant and/or inaccurate
weak organization and presentation
failure to properly address topic
poor analysis and/or problem-solving
Bad fail 10-19 12, 15, 18 Bad work:
information very largely wrong, irrelevant and/or missing; a few facts present.
very poor use of learning resources
widespread confusion and incoherence
badly organized and presented
very little focus on topic
very poor analysis and/or problem-solving
Bad work:
clear lack of understanding
almost complete confusion
very little correct and relevant
badly organized and presented
little recognition of the topic
very poor analysis and/or problem-solving
Bad work:
clear lack of understanding
almost complete confusion
very little correct and relevant
badly organized and presented
little recognition of the topic
very poor analysis and/or problem-solving
Extreme fail 0-9 0, 2, 5, 8 Extremely bad work:
information (almost) all wrong, irrelevant or missing; 1 or 2 relevant statements
(almost) no use of learning resources
(almost) totally confused and incoherent
(almost) completely disorganized
(almost) no recognition of the topic
(almost) no analysis and/or problem-solving
Extremely bad work:
(almost) no understanding evident
(almost) totally confused and incoherent
information (almost) all wrong, irrelevant or missing; 1 or 2 relevant statements
(almost) totally disorganized
(almost) no recognition of the topic
(almost) no analysis and/or problem-solving
Extremely bad work:
(almost) no understanding evident
(almost) totally confused and incoherent
information (almost all) wrong, irrelevant or missing; 1 or 2 relevant statements
(almost) totally disorganized
(almost) no recognition of the topic
(almost) no analysis and/or problem-solving