Milestone 4

Ahokie
Samplepapermilestone4.pdf

William Tanda

Southern New Hampshire University

Final Project

Initial Topic Proposal

My topic proposal for this project would involve negligence more specifically, what

duty do coaches owe to athletes to prevent injuries?

Research Questions and References

Throughout this course we have covered various topics within the realm of Sport Law.

Covering topics such as Constitutional Protections within sports, Contract Law, learning the

difference between “sports law” and “sports and the law”, to Legal Entities within sport, this

course has given me everything I need to be well versed in Sport Law. One topic that we

covered, that I chose to be the basis of my final project topic, is Negligence. Negligence,

according to LII Staff (2017) is “A failure to behave with the level of care that someone of

ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually

consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to act (e.g., a duty

to help victims of one's previous conduct).

Research Summary

I chose negligence because it is an issue that is prevalent within high school and

collegiate athletics. It is also prevalent in recreational sports, which we’ve seen through case

briefs we were assigned this term. In module 2, we reviewed and brief the case of Allen v.

Dover Co-recreational Softball League, 148 N.H. 407 (2002). This case was about an individual

who was hit in the head by a softball and cited that the individual responsible acted negligently

when throwing a softball during warmups without any indication. Although my topic is

This study source was downloaded by 100000780153789 from CourseHero.com on 04-01-2023 17:41:56 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/49701042/10-3-Final-Project-Submission-Final-Paperdocx/

somewhat centered around hazing, this case is relevant because often times individuals know the

rules of leagues or clubs, but do not always follow them to the letter. We’ve all been guilty of

bending the rules here and there, but when it results in the injury of someone else, it then

becomes a problem. We covered a similar case in module 1, Savino v. Robertson, 652 N.E. 2d

1240 811 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). The plaintiff in this case was hit in the eye with a hockey puck

which resulted in an injury. This case differs from the case module 2 because this incident that

resulted in an injury happened while both individuals were engaging in activity while being

within the rules of their league. Although the defendant acted negligently, both parties were

within the rules of the league so the court ruled with the defendant. The case that really relates to

my topic, and a source I will use to drive home my point with my final project, is the case brief

from module 5, Seamons v. Snow, 864 F.supp.111 (1994). In this case, the plaintiff was

assaulted by several of his teammates in the locker room.

The plaintiff and his parents reported the incident to the police and school authorities,

including the principle and the head coach of the team and defendant in this case. The defendant

took no action the teammates who committed the act and instead required the plaintiff to

apologize to the captains of the team for “betraying” them and the team. The plaintiff wanted to

remain on the team but did not want to apologize, and this resulted in the plaintiff being kicked

off the team. The remainder of the season was cancelled the following day. This case really

relates to my topic because this case was a result of hazing. The plaintiff was jumped by some of

his teammates and held down while his clothes were stripped off. His teammates allowed his ex-

girlfriend to come in and see wat was happening to the plaintiff and to get a laugh. The fact that

the plaintiff reported this incident to both his coach and the principal, and nothing came from it

except for his coach making him apologize to the team for snitching is inexcusable.

This study source was downloaded by 100000780153789 from CourseHero.com on 04-01-2023 17:41:56 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/49701042/10-3-Final-Project-Submission-Final-Paperdocx/

end up suffering further injury and making the injury worse than what it already was.

For my final project I will be using the cases Seamons v. Snow, Allen v. Dover Co-

Recreational Softball League, and Home v. North Kitsap School District 2 as some of my

references for my paper. The reason for using these specific cases is because they all deal with

players and negligence involving coaches and the team they play for. Seamons v. Snow involves

hazing in the locker room, which is a common thing especially at the high school level and the

responsibility that the coaches have to avoid being negligent to things like this that happen.

Allen v. Dover Co-Recreational Softball League involves a player being injured after being

struck by a softball and the plaintiff suing the recreational softball league. While this doesn’t

involve a coach being at fault sometimes high school athletes may blame certain injuries on

coaches even though those injuries may just be a result of participating in that specific sport. In

addition to this the inclusion of waivers will be another topic in class that I will include because

there are certain things that a coach may not be held liable for if it was included in the waiver

that the athlete and his or her parents agreed to sign.

Synthesis of Course Content

Negligence is the link between my topics. The question I have involving negligence is,

what do the coaches owe to athletes to help them prevent injuries. In all 3 modules, two, three,

and four the topics regarding negligence were covered. For this project, module four is the

module that closely relates to my topic, regarding that it deals with injuries that were sustained

by athletes due to the negligence. Regarding the case of Home v. North Kitsap School District,

this was a case that was covered in class but also relates to my topic in regards to the North

Kitsap School District. In my opinion, the athlete who is dealing with the injury feels that the

injury was caused due to the coach’s negligence. In module two it talks about the things that the

This study source was downloaded by 100000780153789 from CourseHero.com on 04-01-2023 17:41:56 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/49701042/10-3-Final-Project-Submission-Final-Paperdocx/

plaintiff must establish in order to claim negligence. This connects to my topic in that my

questions states what duty do coaches owe to their athletes to prevent injuries. In order to figure

out what duty coaches owe their athletes it is important to know the things that must be proven to

claim negligence. Module four also discusses defenses against negligence, which is important

for my topic since it is important to know what resources the defendant has in protecting himself

or herself from a negligence accusation.

This study source was downloaded by 100000780153789 from CourseHero.com on 04-01-2023 17:41:56 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/49701042/10-3-Final-Project-Submission-Final-Paperdocx/

References

Kroshus, E., Garnett, B., Hawrilenko, M., Baugh, C. M., & Calzo, J. P. (2015). Concussion

under-reporting and pressure from coaches, teammates, fans, and parents. Social science

& medicine (1982), 134, 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.011

Miller, J. R. (2018, March 6). Football coach urged 'sissy' players to play hurt: suit. Retrieved

from https://nypost.com/2018/03/06/football-coach-called-players-sissies-urged-them-to-

play-hurt-lawsuit/

Murray, E. (2014, November 8). Teens playing through pain, not taking sports injuries seriously.

Retrieved from https://www.today.com/health/teens-playing-through-pain-not-taking-

sports-injuries-seriously-says-1D80274256

HOME v. NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT (Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2

December 2, 1998).

ALLEN v. DOVER CO RECREATIONAL SOFTBALL LEAGUE (July 26, 2002).

Seamons v. Snow (U.S. District Court for the District of Utah September 9, 1998)

LII Staff. (2017, June 06). Negligence. Retrieved from

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence

Savino v. Robertson, 652 N.E. 2d 1240 811 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995)

This study source was downloaded by 100000780153789 from CourseHero.com on 04-01-2023 17:41:56 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/49701042/10-3-Final-Project-Submission-Final-Paperdocx/ Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)