Classroom mangement

stella45
Rules-Rubic.docx

Rules, Consequences, and Rewards 

 

1 No submission 0.00%

2 Insufficient 65.00%

3 Approaching 75.00%

4 Acceptable 85.00%

5 Target 100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

 

25.0 %Rules

Not addressed.

The classroom rules are incomplete and/or not age appropriate. Fewer than three scholarly resources were included.

The classroom rules are identified and age appropriate. Fewer than three scholarly resources were included.

The classroom rules are complete, reasonable, clearly identified, and age appropriate. Three scholarly resources were referenced.

The classroom rules are complete, realistic, clearly identified, and age appropriate. Three or more scholarly resources were referenced.

100.0 %Criteria

 

25.0 %Analysis of Consequences and Rewards

Not addressed.

The analysis of three different consequences and rewards systems is incomplete.

Appropriate analysis of three different consequences and rewards systems.

Comprehensive analysis of three different consequences and rewards systems.

Thorough and comprehensive analysis of three different consequences and rewards systems.

100.0 %Criteria

 

30.0 %Personal Consequences and Rewards System

Not addressed.

The components of the personal consequences and rewards system is incomplete and/or not age appropriate. Fewer than three scholarly resources were included.

All of the components of the personal consequences and rewards system are identified and age appropriate. Fewer than three scholarly resources were included.

All of the components of the personal consequences and rewards system are reasonable, complete, and age appropriate. Three scholarly resources were referenced.

All of the components of the personal consequences and rewards system are complete, comprehensive, and age appropriate. Three or more scholarly resources were referenced.

100.0 %Criteria

 

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

100.0 %Criteria

 

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

100.0 %Criteria

 

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage