Week 3 Assignment: Con-Position Topic & Proposal

Masaira
RUBRICWEEK3.docx

Proposal Grading Rubric - 75 pts

Proposal Grading Rubric - 75 pts

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

5.0 pts

Meets length requirement

0.0 pts

Does not meet length requirement

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis/Claim

10.0 pts

The thesis contains the main claim that can be argued.

8.0 pts

The thesis is somewhat vague in its claim and needs to be defined clearly.

6.0 pts

The claim cannot be argued.

0.0 pts

There is no claim/thesis.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposal

20.0 pts

The proposal exhibits clear direction for supporting the thesis through research. The proposal considers the challenges in the research process and proposes appropriate strategies to overcome the challenges.

16.0 pts

The proposal exhibits a fairly clear direction for supporting the thesis through research. The proposal considers the challenges in the research process but might not provide effective approaches to overcome the challenges.

12.0 pts

The proposal is unclear in the direction for supporting the thesis and does not consider challenges in the research process.

0.0 pts

No effort

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource 1

10.0 pts

The evidence for each source is detailed and clearly supports the points noted.

8.0 pts

The evidence for each source could be expanded further, but the connection to the point is clear, or the evidence is detailed but the connection needs to be fine-tuned.

6.0 pts

The evidence for each source is vague or unclear and/or does not support points noted.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource 2

10.0 pts

The evidence for each source is detailed and clearly supports the points noted.

8.0 pts

The evidence for each source could be expanded further, but the connection to the point is clear, or the evidence is detailed but the connection needs to be fine-tuned.

6.0 pts

The evidence for each source is vague or unclear and/or does not support points noted.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource 3

10.0 pts

The evidence for each source is detailed and clearly supports the points noted.

8.0 pts

The evidence for each source could be expanded further, but the connection to the point is clear, or the evidence is detailed but the connection needs to be fine-tuned.

6.0 pts

The evidence for each source is vague or unclear and/or does not support points noted.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the text.

4.0 pts

The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.

3.0 pts

The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, and these errors do detract from a clear reading of the text.

0.0 pts

No effort

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

5.0 pts

All sources are properly cited.

4.0 pts

There are a few minor errors in the citations.

3.0 pts

There are some major errors in the citations.

0.0 pts

No effort

5.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0