Ass 1
RUBRIC TO FFL FOR ASSIGNMENT 1 DIDATIC
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair Poor |
|
|
In 1–2 pages, address the following: • Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents. |
23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and concisely explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents. |
20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response accurately explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents. |
18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents. |
0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains interventions that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents. Interventions may not represent the three types of interventions required, or response may be missing. |
|
• Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug? |
23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and concisely explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. A concise and accurate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided. |
20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response accurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. An adequate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided. |
18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is somewhat vague or inaccurate. |
0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is vague or inaccurate. Or, the response is missing. |
|
• Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration. |
23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and concisely uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations. |
20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response accurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations. |
18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations. |
0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations. Or, the response is missing. |
|
• Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). Attach the PDFs of your sources. |
9 (9%) - 10 (10%) The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making. |
8 (8%) - 8 (8%) The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations. |
7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations, but they may only provide vague or weak justification. |
0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Two or fewer resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations. The resources may not be current or evidence based. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) APA format errors |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors |
|
Total Points: |
RUBR
IC TO FFL FOR ASSIGNMENT 1 DIDATIC
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
In 1
–
2 pages, address the following:
• Recommend one FDA
-
approved
drug, one off
-
label drug, and one
nonpharmacological intervention for
treating your assigned disorder in
children and adolescents.
23
(23%)
-
25
(25%)
The response accurately and concisely
explains one FDA
-
approved drug, one
of
f
-
label drug, and one
nonpharmacological intervention that
would be appropriate for treating the
assigned disorder in children and
adolescents.
20
(20%)
-
22
(22%)
The response accurately explains one
FDA
-
approved drug, one off
-
label drug,
and one nonpharm
acological
intervention that would be appropriate
for treating the assigned disorder in
children and adolescents.
18
(18%)
-
19
(19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or
inaccurately explains one FDA
-
approved drug, one off
-
label drug, and
one nonpharmacologic
al intervention
that would be appropriate for treating
the assigned disorder in children and
adolescents.
0
(0%)
-
17
(17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately
explains interventions that would be
appropriate for treating the assigned
disorder in children
and adolescents.
Interventions may not represent the
three types of interventions required,
or response may be missing.
• Explain the risk assessment you
would use to inform your treatment
decision making. What are the risks
and benefits of the FDA
-
appro
ved
medicine? What are the risks and
benefits of the off
-
label drug?
23
(23%)
-
25
(25%)
The response accurately and concisely
explains the risk assessment you would
use to inform your treatment decision
making. A concise and accurate
explanation of the ri
sks and benefits of
each pharmacological intervention is
provided.
20
(20%)
-
22
(22%)
The response accurately explains the
risk assessment you would use to
inform your treatment decision
making. An adequate explanation of
the risks and benefits of each
ph
armacological intervention is
provided.
18
(18%)
-
19
(19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or
inaccurately explains the risk
assessment you would use to inform
your treatment decision making. The
explanation of the risks and benefits of
each pharmacological
intervention is
somewhat vague or inaccurate.
0
(0%)
-
17
(17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately
explains the risk assessment you would
use to inform your treatment decision
making. The risks and benefits of each
pharmacological intervention is vague
or inaccurate. Or, the response is
missing.
• Explain whether clinical practice
guidelines exist for this disorder and, if
so, use them to justify your
recommendations. If not, explain what
information you would need to take
into consideration.
23
(23%)
-
25
(25%)
The response accurately and concise
ly
uses either clinical guidelines (if
available) or other information from
the literature to justify intervention
recommendations.
20
(20%)
-
22
(22%)
The response accurately uses either
clinical guidelines (if available) or other
information from the lit
erature to
justify intervention recommendations.
18
(18%)
-
19
(19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or
inaccurately uses either clinical
guidelines (if available) or other
information from the literature to
justify intervention recommendations.
0
(0%)
-
17
(17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately
uses either clinical guidelines (if
available) or other information from
the literature to justify intervention
recommendations. Or, the response is
missing.
• Support your reasoning with at least
three scholarly
resources, one each on
the FDA
-
approved drug, the off
-
label,
and a non
-
medication intervention for
the disorder. Be sure they are current
(no more than 5 years old). Attach the
PDFs of your sources.
9
(9%)
-
10
(10%)
The response provides at least three
c
urrent, evidence
-
based resources
from the literature to support the
intervention recommendations. The
resources reflect the latest clinical
8
(8%)
-
8
(8%)
The response provides at least thre
e
current, evidence
-
based resources
from the literature to support the
intervention recommendations.
7
(7%)
-
7
(7%)
Three evidence
-
based resources are
provided to support the intervention
recommendations, but they may only
provide vague or weak justificat
ion.
0
(0%)
-
6
(6%)
Two or fewer resources are provided
to support the intervention
recommendations. The resources may
not be current or evidence based.
RUBRIC TO FFL FOR ASSIGNMENT 1 DIDATIC
Excellent Good Fair Poor
In 1–2 pages, address the following:
• Recommend one FDA-approved
drug, one off-label drug, and one
nonpharmacological intervention for
treating your assigned disorder in
children and adolescents.
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response accurately and concisely
explains one FDA-approved drug, one
off-label drug, and one
nonpharmacological intervention that
would be appropriate for treating the
assigned disorder in children and
adolescents.
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response accurately explains one
FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug,
and one nonpharmacological
intervention that would be appropriate
for treating the assigned disorder in
children and adolescents.
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or
inaccurately explains one FDA-
approved drug, one off-label drug, and
one nonpharmacological intervention
that would be appropriate for treating
the assigned disorder in children and
adolescents.
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately
explains interventions that would be
appropriate for treating the assigned
disorder in children and adolescents.
Interventions may not represent the
three types of interventions required,
or response may be missing.
• Explain the risk assessment you
would use to inform your treatment
decision making. What are the risks
and benefits of the FDA-approved
medicine? What are the risks and
benefits of the off-label drug?
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response accurately and concisely
explains the risk assessment you would
use to inform your treatment decision
making. A concise and accurate
explanation of the risks and benefits of
each pharmacological intervention is
provided.
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response accurately explains the
risk assessment you would use to
inform your treatment decision
making. An adequate explanation of
the risks and benefits of each
pharmacological intervention is
provided.
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or
inaccurately explains the risk
assessment you would use to inform
your treatment decision making. The
explanation of the risks and benefits of
each pharmacological intervention is
somewhat vague or inaccurate.
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately
explains the risk assessment you would
use to inform your treatment decision
making. The risks and benefits of each
pharmacological intervention is vague
or inaccurate. Or, the response is
missing.
• Explain whether clinical practice
guidelines exist for this disorder and, if
so, use them to justify your
recommendations. If not, explain what
information you would need to take
into consideration.
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response accurately and concisely
uses either clinical guidelines (if
available) or other information from
the literature to justify intervention
recommendations.
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response accurately uses either
clinical guidelines (if available) or other
information from the literature to
justify intervention recommendations.
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or
inaccurately uses either clinical
guidelines (if available) or other
information from the literature to
justify intervention recommendations.
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately
uses either clinical guidelines (if
available) or other information from
the literature to justify intervention
recommendations. Or, the response is
missing.
• Support your reasoning with at least
three scholarly resources, one each on
the FDA-approved drug, the off-label,
and a non-medication intervention for
the disorder. Be sure they are current
(no more than 5 years old). Attach the
PDFs of your sources.
9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
The response provides at least three
current, evidence-based resources
from the literature to support the
intervention recommendations. The
resources reflect the latest clinical
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
The response provides at least three
current, evidence-based resources
from the literature to support the
intervention recommendations.
7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
Three evidence-based resources are
provided to support the intervention
recommendations, but they may only
provide vague or weak justification.
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
Two or fewer resources are provided
to support the intervention
recommendations. The resources may
not be current or evidence based.