Check in rubric term paper and sample outline docs
Term Paper Rubric
|
Word Count · 750-1250 words · Word count indicated on document |
5pts |
|
Style · Free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors · Engaging & well-written |
10pts |
|
Author’s Thesis/Conclusion · Correctly identifies author’s thesis |
8pts |
|
Author’s Argument · Correctly outline the author’s primary argument for the thesis · The relationship between premises is explained, when relevant (e.g. when one premise follows logically from several others) |
15pts |
|
Author’s Support · Clearly explains evidence (thought experiments, research studies, etc.) that author uses to establish premises · Clearly explains the relationship between evidence and premise |
15pts. |
|
Thesis · Student has a readily identifiable thesis that clearly states the position that the student will argue for |
5pts |
|
Objection · Student’s objection is substantive and philosophical in nature* · Student’s objection is original** · Student supports their objection with thoughts experiments, counterexamples, etc. when necessary · If objection makes use of philosophical concepts or terms, these are defined and used correctly |
22pts |
|
Considers Objections · Student considers potential objections to the argument that they have given · EX. A reply from the original author · The objection considered is reasonably the strongest objection available |
10pts |
|
Rebuttal · Student successfully refutes the potential objection to their view |
10pts |
|
Citations · Direct quotes from assigned texts are cited parenthetically · EX. (Jenkins, 64) · Any information from outside sources receives a parenthetical citation and a bibliographic entry*** |
Failure to properly credit authors is plagiarism
|
|
Total /100 |
|
*This is not a review or a research paper. The goal of the paper is to undermine an author’s argument by showing that the argument is either invalid or unsound. Students should target philosophical premises.
**Original means that the student has made a novel contribution to the discussion. This can mean substantially adding to or elaborating upon existing objections, but ideally the source of the objection is the student’s mind.
***The CD is more likely than the AA to use outside sources. However, I encourage you to do so sparingly.
|
|
|
|