Response
4/6/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_636380_1&course_id=_108021_1… 1/5
Rubric DetailRubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement Uns
Topic Development: Critical Thinking and Analysis
1 (50.00%) Thoroughly argued different
0.75 (37.50%) Somewhat argued
0.5 (25.00%) Limited argument of different points of agreement and
0.25 (12.50%) Little to no attempt to argue different points of
0 (0 No p agre disag
Name: Scenario Response Rubric
Description: Scenario responses are graded using the following rubrics. ExitExit
Grid View List View
4/6/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_636380_1&course_id=_108021_1… 2/5
Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement Uns
Analysis points of agreement and disagreement and was rich in context, demonstrated critical thinking, or offered new knowledge and insight; response made substantial connections to the course by using the required textbook and academic and/or industry references.
argued different points of agreement and disagreement AND/OR expressed moderate contextual richness, critical thinking, or new knowledge and insight; response made moderate connections to the course by using the required textbook and/or industry references. Ideas need more development.
g disagreement AND/OR expressed limited contextual richness, critical thinking, or new knowledge and insight; response made a limited connection to the course made by using the required textbook and academic/industry references Ideas need significantly more development.
p agreement and disagreements AND/OR expressed little to no effort to incorporate critical thinking, new knowledge, or insights; response made little to no effort to make a connection to the course by using the required textbook and academic and/or industry references. Ideas were primarily “I agree” statements or restatements of the original submission ideas.
g mad dem critic insig know Resp unsu opin assu resta the o subm resp no co the c did n incor requ and and/ sour
Writing Mechanics; APA Style (6th ed.)
0.5 (25.00%) Strictly adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, runon sentences, missing or
extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No
0.375 (18.75%) Excellently adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, runon sentences, missing or
extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No
0.25 (12.50%) Satisfactorily adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Some contractions or jargon used. Seven to 10 errors noted.
Attempted intext citations and reference list but 5 6 APA style errors existed OR
0.125 (6.25%) Minimally adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Contractions or jargon used. More than 10 errors found OR
somewhat incomprehensible. Attempted intext citations and reference list but
0 (0 Does to th usag writte mec used and sente than Writt mec inclu not l capit punc on se miss word spell gram error overw num cont
jargo incom OR w acad subm
4/6/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_636380_1&course_id=_108021_1… 3/5
Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement Uns contractions or jargon used. Zero to two errors noted. Appropriately cited reference materials; authors last name, initials, publication year, source title, publication name, issue, volume, and weblink. Reference listed in alphabetical. Intext citations include the authors last name, publication year, and page number if using a direct language from the source. 1 2 APA style or usage errors.
contractions or jargon used. Three to six errors noted. Attempted in text citations and reference list but 3 4 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 1 2 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference.
failed to use APA citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference.
7 8 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 5 6 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference.
the n error plent style OR m APA exist to us citati appr than throu mea ideas were stude thou infor from refer
Attention to Instructions
0.5 (25.00%) Scenario response
0.375 (18.75%) Scenario response
0.25 (12.50%) Scenario response omitted two major
0.125 (6.25%) Scenario response omitted two major
0 (0 Scen resp more
4/6/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_636380_1&course_id=_108021_1… 4/5
Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement Uns
response contained all 5 major assignment requirements: 1) At least 300 words, 2) At least two scholarly references no older than 2005, 3) APA format with reference list and intext citations, 4) Does not contain informal greetings such as “Hi Class,” or closing statements such as “Thank you all,” and 5) written in a clear and concise manner.
response omitted one major assignment requirements.
j assignment requirements.
j assignment requirements.
majo requ
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) Plagiarized: There is a zerotolerance
0 (0.00%) Late: Per the course syllabus, no
0 (0.00%) Offtopic: Submission was completely off
0 (0.00%) 0 (0
4/6/2019 Rubric Detail – 2019_SPR_IIG_Bus Cont Plan & Disaste ...
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_636380_1&course_id=_108021_1… 5/5
Successful Adequate Developing NeedImprovement Uns policy for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Per the course syllabus, any student who engages in academic dishonesty and plagiarism will receive a zero for all corresponding sections for the assignment. As an example, if you plagiarize Scenario Submission 1, you will receive a zero for both Scenario Submission 1 and Scenario Response 1 assignments.
y , late assignments are accepted without prior approval.
p y topic.
Name:Scenario Response Rubric
Description:Scenario responses are graded using the following rubrics. ExitExit