The Dollar Game Ethics

Criteria

Below Expectations

Meets Expectations

Excellent

Content (25%)

Students did not completely answer most questions or gave answers that were irrelevant to questions

Students attempted to answer all questions but did not give relevant answers to many questions. Or students gave answers too succinctly.

Students answered all questions and all answers were complete and relevant.

Evidence

(25%)

Students did not use textbook or other outside sources at all to support answers

Students attempted to provide information from textbook or other sources with some interpretation. But not all information was relevant or complete.

Students provided relevant information from textbook, personal experience or other outside sources with appropriate interpretation.

Critical thinking

(25%)

Students did not clarify their perspectives or positions. No attempts were made to think critically about questions.

Students attempted to specify their positions, perspectives, or opinions about the assignment. Students attempted to think critically about the issue.

Students clearly stated their positions, perspectives or opinions about the assignment. Students also considered others’ points of view within position.

Readability

(25%)

Awkward phrasing, unskillful or inappropriate voice/tone and imprecise vocabulary.

Document is unreadable.

Phrasing is generally effective but inappropriate tone and imprecise vocabulary appear occasionally.

Phrasing is generally effective. Voice/tone and vocabulary are generally appropriate.

Points

3 points

4 points

5 points