Project and Resource Management for the Health Services Organizations

RubricDetailBlackboardLearn.html

Home >Nursing homework help >Project and Resource Management for the Health Services Organizations

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: DDHA_8450_Week11_FinalProject_Rubric

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Content	Points: Points Range: 157 (62.8%) - 175 (70%) Paper demonstrates excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 140 (56%) - 156 (62.4%) Paper demonstrates good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 122 (48.8%) - 139 (55.6%) Paper demonstrates fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 121 (48.4%) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Feedback:
Writing	Points: Points Range: 67 (26.8%) - 75 (30%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the Assignment. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 60 (24%) - 66 (26.4%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors and/or somewhat fewer than the expected number of or type of sources. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 53 (21.2%) - 59 (23.6%) Paper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style and/or may contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or it shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (in number or quality). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 52 (20.8%) Paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or it relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Content--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 157 (62.8%) - 175 (70%) Paper demonstrates excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Good 140 (56%) - 156 (62.4%) Paper demonstrates good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Fair 122 (48.8%) - 139 (55.6%) Paper demonstrates fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Poor 0 (0%) - 121 (48.4%) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Feedback:

Writing--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 67 (26.8%) - 75 (30%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the Assignment. Good 60 (24%) - 66 (26.4%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors and/or somewhat fewer than the expected number of or type of sources. Fair 53 (21.2%) - 59 (23.6%) Paper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style and/or may contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or it shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (in number or quality). Poor 0 (0%) - 52 (20.8%) Paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or it relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources. Feedback:

Total Points: 250