Proposed Course for Development 4-6 page paper Who can help Me? Education Paper
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 140 |
Assignment 3: Proposed Course for Development – Part 1 |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Provide a description of a course that you plan to develop for this class, including at least three (3) goals of the course. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely provided a description of a course that you plan to develop for this class, including at least three (3) goals of the course. |
Partially provided a description of a course that you plan to develop for this class, including at least three (3) goals of the course. |
Satisfactorily provided a description of a course that you plan to develop for this class, including at least three (3) goals of the course. |
Thoroughly provided a description of a course that you plan to develop for this class, including at least three (3) goals of the course. |
|
2. Describe the target learners, discussing at least three (3) unique needs and / or challenges the online learners face. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely described the target learners, discussing at least three (3) unique needs and / or challenges the online learners face. |
Partially described the target learners, discussing at least three (3) unique needs and / or challenges the online learners face. |
Satisfactorily described the target learners, discussing at least three (3) unique needs and / or challenges the online learners face. |
Thoroughly described the target learners, discussing at least three (3) unique needs and / or challenges the online learners face. |
|
3. Develop six (6) relevant learning outcomes for the course. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely developed six (6) relevant learning outcomes for the course. |
Partially developed six (6) relevant learning outcomes for the course. |
Satisfactorily developed six (6) relevant learning outcomes for the course. |
Thoroughly developed six (6) relevant learning outcomes for the course. |
|
4. Propose the primary learning theory or theories you plan to apply to ensure students achieve the outcomes, providing a rationale for the theory or theories. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the primary learning theory or theories you plan to apply to ensure students achieve the outcomes; did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for the theory or theories. |
Partially proposed the primary learning theory or theories you plan to apply to ensure students achieve the outcomes; partially provided a rationale for the theory or theories. |
Satisfactorily proposed the primary learning theory or theories you plan to apply to ensure students achieve the outcomes; satisfactorily provided a rationale for the theory or theories. |
Thoroughly proposed the primary learning theory or theories you plan to apply to ensure students achieve the outcomes; thoroughly provided a rationale for the theory or theories. |
|
5. Propose three (3) ways you plan to motivate students in the online environment, providing a rationale for each way. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely proposed three (3) ways you plan to motivate students in the online environment; did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for each way. |
Partially proposed three (3) ways you plan to motivate students in the online environment; partially provided a rationale for each way. |
Satisfactorily proposed three (3) ways you plan to motivate students in the online environment; satisfactorily provided a rationale for each way. |
Thoroughly proposed three (3) ways you plan to motivate students in the online environment; thoroughly provided a rationale for each way. |
|
6. Provide at least three (3) academic references (published within the last five [5] years) to support your proposal. Weight: 5%
|
No references provided-. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high- quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high- quality choices. |
|
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |