2-2 Projection Preparation: Stakeholders
9/25/23, 4:35 PM Assignment Information
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1394584/viewContent/27121331/View 1/3
IHP 501 Module Two Project Preparation Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Stakeholder support is critical for the success of short-term volunteer aid trips. Working responsibly and effectively with host staff is particularly important, but there are other potential
stakeholders to consider. These stakeholders might be from other not-for-pro�ts, NGOs, philanthropists, academic institutions, government agencies, lobbyists, or other interested groups.
Investigating potential stakeholder support is a critical step in developing humanitarian aid interventions. It allows you to answer the questions: Who will implement the intervention
strategies? How will you leverage and strengthen existing community resources? Who will ensure accountability and measure success?
Prompt
In your reading, you reviewed an example stakeholder identi�cation table for a sexually transmitted diseases program evaluation. For this assignment, you will craft a short paper to identify
similar lists of potential stakeholders that could support your humanitarian aid trip. Your stakeholder lists can overlap, but you should have at least eight stakeholders or stakeholder groups
identi�ed in total.
You should cite at least three sources from your own investigation, which may include scholarly and non-scholarly sources. The evidence should not be older than �ve years. To access the
Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.
Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:
1. Implementers: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential implementers for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or
group, provide a brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
2. Decision Makers: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential decision makers for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or
group, provide a brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
3. Participants: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential participants for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or group,
provide a brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
4. Partners: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential partners for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or group, provide a
brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
What to Submit
Your short paper must be a 1- to 2-page Word document, not including the title page and references. It must be written in APA format. You may also include bullet lists. Use double spacing, 12-
point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references must be cited in APA format.
9/25/23, 4:35 PM Assignment Information
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1394584/viewContent/27121331/View 2/3
Module Two Project Preparation Rubric
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Implementers Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Identi�es a list of at least two
stakeholders or stakeholder
groups for this category and
provides a brief description and
rationale based on their mission
and capabilities
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 20
Decision Makers Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Identi�es a list of at least two
stakeholders or stakeholder
groups for this category and
provides a brief description and
rationale based on their mission
and capabilities
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 20
Participants Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Identi�es a list of at least two
stakeholders or stakeholder
groups for this category and
provides a brief description and
rationale based on their mission
and capabilities
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 20
Partners Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Identi�es a list of at least two
stakeholders or stakeholder
groups for this category and
provides a brief description and
rationale based on their mission
and capabilities
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 20
Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner
Clearly conveys meaning with
correct grammar, sentence
structure, and spelling,
demonstrating an
understanding of audience and
purpose
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, negatively
impacting readability
Submission has critical errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, preventing
understanding of ideas
10
9/25/23, 4:35 PM Assignment Information
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1394584/viewContent/27121331/View 3/3
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Sources Incorporates more than three
current (within the last �ve
years) sources, or use of
sources is exceptionally
insightful
Incorporates three current
(within the last �ve years)
sources that support claims
Incorporates fewer than three
current (within the last �ve
years) sources, or not all
sources support claims
Does not incorporate sources 5
APA Style Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with no errors
Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with fewer than �ve
errors
Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with �ve or more errors
Does not format in-text
citations and reference list
according to APA style
5
Total: 100%