| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| HCA-545 | HCA-545-O500 | Strategic Management and Organizational Change | 65.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) | 4: Good (87.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 80.0% |
| Strategic Management Model Addressing the Concept and Process of Change for Growth and Sustainability of the Organization | 20.0% | Discussion of the strategic management model that is necessary for addressing concept and process for change for the growth and sustainability of the organization is not included. | Discussion of the strategic management model that is necessary for addressing the concept and process for change for the growth, sustainability, and development of an organization is incomplete or incorrect. | Discussion of the strategic management model that is necessary for addressing the concept and process for change for the growth, sustainability, and development of an organization is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of the strategic management model that is necessary for addressing the concept and process for change for the growth, sustainability, and development of an organization is complete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of the strategic management model that is necessary for addressing the concept and process for change for the growth, sustainability, and development of an organization is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details. |
| Differentiate Transactional and Transformational Change | 20.0% | Differentiation of transactional and transformational change is not included. | Differentiation of transactional and transformational change, including how each impacts the effectiveness of change in a health care organization, is incomplete or incorrect. | Differentiation of transactional and transformational change, including how each impacts the effectiveness of change in a health care organization, is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. | Differentiation of transactional and transformational change, including how each impacts the effectiveness of change in a health care organization, is complete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details. | Differentiation of transactional and transformational change, including how each impacts the effectiveness of change in a health care organization, is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details. |
| Theories of Management | 20.0% | Discussion of three theories of management are not included. | Discussion of three theories of management, including an example of the areas or departments in which each theory might be most effective, is incomplete or incorrect. | Discussion of three theories of management, including an example of the areas or departments in which each theory might be most effective, is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of three theories of management, including an example of the areas or departments in which each theory might be most effective is complete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details. | Discussion of three theories of management, including an example of the areas or departments in which each theory might be most effective, is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details. |
| Assessing Leadership Effectiveness | 20.0% | Explanation of the tools and advice that can be utilized to assess leadership effectiveness is not included. | Explanation of the tools and advice that can be utilized to assess leadership effectiveness is incomplete or incorrect. | Explanation of the tools and advice that can be utilized to assess leadership effectiveness is included but lacks relevant supporting details. | Explanation of the tools and advice that can be utilized to assess leadership effectiveness is complete and includes relevant supporting details. | Explanation of the tools and advice that can be utilized to assess leadership effectiveness is thorough and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 15.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 5.0% |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 3.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 2.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |