| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ECS-565 | ECS-565-O500 | Analyzing Emotional Competence | 50.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Jackie | 25.0% | Not addressed. | The analysis of Jackie's scenario is incomplete or illogical. | The analysis of Jackie's scenario has minimal justification. | The analysis of Jackie's scenario is logical. | The analysis of Jackie's scenario is clear and convincing. |
| Thomas and Ruben | 25.0% | Not addressed. | The analysis of Thomas and Ruben's scenario is incomplete or illogical. | The analysis of Thomas and Ruben's scenario has minimal justification. | The analysis of Thomas and Ruben's scenario is logical. | The analysis of Thomas and Ruben's scenario is clear and convincing. |
| Mr. Alexander | 25.0% | Not addressed. | The analysis of Mr. Alexander's scenario is incomplete or illogical. | The analysis of Mr. Alexander's scenario has minimal justification. | The analysis of Mr. Alexander's scenario is logical. | The analysis of Mr. Alexander's scenario is clear and convincing. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |