The Shared Leadership Initiative

The Shared Leadership Initiative - Rubric

Measurable Criteria 17.5 points

Criteria Description

Measurable Criteria

5. Target 17.5 points

Narrative proficiently identifies objectives, measurable criteria used to assess

applicants for any non-administrative or non-instructional positions.

4. Acceptable 15.23 points

Narrative clearly identifies objectives, measurable criteria used to assess applicants

for any non-administrative or non-instructional positions.

3. Approaching 12.95 points

Narrative ambiguously identifies objectives, measurable criteria used to assess

applicants for any non-administrative or non-instructional positions.

2. Insufficient 12.08 points

Narrative inadequately identifies objectives, measurable criteria used to assess

applicants for any non-administrative or non-instructional positions.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Protocol 17.5 points

Criteria Description

Protocol

5. Target 17.5 points

Narrative thoroughly includes protocol to ensure an unyielding commitment to the

positive school culture including staff morale, shared leadership, collaboration,

trust, and a student-centered environment is supported.

4. Acceptable 15.23 points

Collapse All

Narrative logically includes protocol to ensure an unyielding commitment to the

positive school culture including staff morale, shared leadership, collaboration,

trust, and a student-centered environment is supported.

3. Approaching 12.95 points

Narrative weakly includes protocol to ensure an unyielding commitment to the

positive school culture including staff morale, shared leadership, collaboration,

trust, and a student-centered environment is supported.

2. Insufficient 12.08 points

Narrative incorrectly includes protocol to ensure an unyielding commitment to the

positive school culture including staff morale, shared leadership, collaboration,

trust, and a student-centered environment is supported.

Strategies 21 points

Criteria Description

Strategies

5. Target 21 points

Narrative proficiently includes realistic strategies for promoting effective

team/group dynamics in the newly developed process.

4. Acceptable 18.27 points

Narrative directly includes suitable strategies for promoting effective team/group

dynamics in the newly developed process.

3. Approaching 15.54 points

Narrative unclearly includes vague strategies for promoting effective team/group

dynamics in the newly developed process.

2. Insufficient 14.49 points

Narrative poorly includes inappropriate strategies for promoting effective

team/group dynamics in the newly developed process.

1. No Submission 0 points

Organization 7 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 7 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the

required word count.

4. Acceptable 6.09 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is

within a reasonable range of the required word count.

3. Approaching 5.18 points

The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with

a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the

required word count.

2. Insufficient 4.83 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the

summary is widely outside of the required word count.

Mechanics of Writing 7 points

Criteria Description

includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use

5. Target 7 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are

varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 6.09 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder

comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some

practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 5.18 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in

language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.

2. Insufficient 4.83 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

1 No Submission 0 points Total 70 points