H & P note 2
History and Physical Note
12 points
Criteria Description
History and Physical Note (Chief Complaint, HPI, Patient History, Home Medications, Review of Systems, Vital Signs, Physical Exam, Test Results)
5. Target
12 points
The history and physical note is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Acceptable
10.8 points
The history and physical note is provided with appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching
9.6 points
The history and physical note is present, but only minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient
6 points
The history and physical note is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The history and physical note is not included.
Assessment and Clinical Impressions
12 points
Criteria Description
Assessment and Clinical Impressions (Identification of Three Differential Diagnoses, List of Acute and Chronic Diagnoses, List of Diagnoses and Conditions in Priority Order)
5. Target
12 points
The assessment and clinical impressions are thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Acceptable
10.8 points
The assessment and clinical impressions are provided with appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching
9.6 points
The assessment and clinical impressions are present, but only minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient
6 points
The assessment and clinical impressions are incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The assessment and clinical impressions are not included.
Plan Component Management and Criteria
12 points
Criteria Description
Plan Component Management and Criteria Incorporation (Interventions, Disposition, Expected Outcomes, Health Education, and Case Summary)
5. Target
12 points
The plan component management and plan criteria incorporation are thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Acceptable
10.8 points
The plan component management and plan criteria incorporation are provided with appropriate details and support.
3. Approaching
9.6 points
The plan component management and plan criteria incorporation are present, but only minimal detail or support is provided.
2. Insufficient
6 points
The plan component management and plan criteria incorporation are incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The plan component management and plan criteria incorporation are not included.
Peer-Reviewed Articles
6 points
Criteria Description
Peer-Reviewed Articles
5. Target
6 points
Three peer-reviewed articles are included.
4. Acceptable
5.4 points
N/A
3. Approaching
4.8 points
N/A
2. Insufficient
3 points
Fewer than three peer-reviewed articles are provided.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Three peer-reviewed articles are not included.
Mechanics of Writing
6 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
6 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
5.4 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
4.8 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
3 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
12 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
12 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable
10.8 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
9.6 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
6 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 60 points