Project Performance

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Satisfactory

Competent

Exemplary

Provide a brief summary of chosen project.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief summary of chosen project.

Points:

7.15 (6.50%)

Insufficiently provided a brief summary of chosen project.

Points:

8.25 (7.50%)

Partially provided a brief summary of chosen project.

Points:

9.35 (8.50%)

Satisfactorily provided a brief summary of chosen project.

Points:

11 (10.00%)

Thoroughly provided a brief summary of chosen project.

Examine at least three of the project’s greatest risks, and provide a recommendation for addressing each of the risks.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely examined at least three of the project’s greatest risks. Did not submit or incompletely provided a recommendation for addressing each of the risks.

Points:

25.025 (22.75%)

Insufficiently examined at least three of the project’s greatest risks. Insufficiently provided a recommendation for addressing each of the risks.

Points:

28.875 (26.25%)

Partially examined at least three of the project’s greatest risks. Partially provided a recommendation for addressing each of the risks.

Points:

32.725 (29.75%)

Satisfactorily examined at least three of the project’s greatest risks. Satisfactorily provided a recommendation for addressing each of the risks.

Points:

38.5 (35.00%)

Thoroughly examined at least three of the project’s greatest risks. Thoroughly provided a recommendation for addressing each of the risks.

Examine how to manage project performance via earned value management (EVM). Identify at least three key EVM metrics to use for the project. Examine how to manage project performance via earned value management (EVM). Identify at least three key EVM metrics to use for the project.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely examined how to manage project performance via earned value management (EVM), and identified fewer than three key EVM metrics.

Points:

25.025 (22.75%)

Insufficiently examined how to manage project performance via earned value management (EVM), and/or identified fewer than three key EVM metrics.

Points:

28.875 (26.25%)

Partially examined how to manage project performance via earned value management (EVM), and/or identified fewer than three key EVM metrics.

Points:

32.725 (29.75%)

Satisfactorily examined how to manage project performance via earned value management (EVM), and identified three key EVM metrics.

Points:

38.5 (35.00%)

Thoroughly examined how to manage project performance via earned value management (EVM), and identified more than three key EVM metrics.

Cite three references.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

References were not provided, or the references were not of a quality nature.

Points:

7.15 (6.50%)

One quality reference was provided.

Points:

8.25 (7.50%)

Two quality references were provided.

Points:

9.35 (8.50%)

Three quality references were provided.

Points:

11 (10.00%)

More than three quality references were provided.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

More than eight errors present.

Points:

7.15 (6.50%)

7–8 errors present.

Points:

8.25 (7.50%)

5–6 errors present.

Points:

9.35 (8.50%)

3–4 errors present.

Points:

11 (10.00%)

0–2 errors present.