Summative Assignment: Critique of Research Article
6/2/20, 11:24 PMRubric Detail – OC_NURS350_202004SPII_OL-K
Page 1 of 4https://learn.westcoastuniversity.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/grad…ewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_262759_1
Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Mostly Meets Expectations
Below Expectations
Research Problem/Purpose
25.2 (9.00%) - 28 (10.00%)
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are clearly identi!ed.
21.28 (7.60%) - 24.92 (8.90%)
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are somewhat identi!ed.
16.8 (6.00%) - 21 (7.50%)
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are mostly absent or misidenti!ed.
Review of the Literature
37.8 (13.50%) - 42 (15.00%)
Concepts explored in the literature review are clearly identi!ed. Critique of the references is included and well developed.
31.92 (11.40%) - 37.38 (13.35%)
Concepts explored in the literature review are somewhat identi!ed. Critique of the references is included, but may not be fully developed.
25.2 (9.00%) - 31.5 (11.25%)
Concepts explored in the literature review are misidenti!ed. Critique of the references is severely lacking.
Name: NURS350-Research Critique
Description: This rubric is used to evaluate the Research Critique Assignment in NURS350.
Exit
Grid View List View
6/2/20, 11:24 PMRubric Detail – OC_NURS350_202004SPII_OL-K
Page 2 of 4https://learn.westcoastuniversity.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/grad…ewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_262759_1
Theoretical Framework
25.2 (9.00%) - 28 (10.00%)
A theoretical concept/framework is identi!ed and well analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a suitable one is suggested.
21.28 (7.60%) - 24.92 (8.90%)
A theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identi!ed and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, but it is somewhat inappropriate.
16.8 (6.00%) - 21 (7.50%)
A theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identi!ed and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, is not identi!ed or is grossly inappropriate.
Variables, Hypotheses, Questions, and Assumptions
12.6 (4.50%) - 14 (5.00%)
IV and DV are identi!ed and de!ned. Discussion on measurability is included. Research question and hypothesis are identi!ed.
10.64 (3.80%) - 12.46 (4.45%)
IV and DV are somewhat identi!ed and or partially de!ned. Discussion on measurability is somewhat included. Research question and hypothesis are partially identi!ed.
8.4 (3.00%) - 10.5 (3.75%)
IV and DV identi!cation and de!nition are absent or severely lacking. Discussion on measurability is absent or inaccurate. Research question and hypothesis are not identi!ed or grossly misidenti!ed.
Methodology 50.4 (18.00%) - 56 (20.00%)
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are properly identi!ed. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical
42.56 (15.20%) - 49.84 (17.80%)
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are somewhat identi!ed. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical
33.6 (12.00%) - 42 (15.00%)
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent or misidenti!ed. Reliability and validity of measurement tools,
6/2/20, 11:24 PMRubric Detail – OC_NURS350_202004SPII_OL-K
Page 3 of 4https://learn.westcoastuniversity.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/grad…ewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_262759_1
ethical considerations, and probability vs. non- probability sampling are discussed.
ethical considerations, and probability vs. non- probability sampling are discussed, but some information is inaccurate.
measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non- probability sampling are either absent or grossly inaccurate.
Data Analysis 37.8 (13.50%) - 42 (15.00%)
Data analysis tool is identi!ed. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included and accurate. At least one !nding is appropriately identi!ed.
31.92 (11.40%) - 37.38 (13.35%)
Data analysis tool is somewhat identi!ed. An incomplete explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included. At least one !nding is identi!ed.
25.2 (9.00%) - 31.5 (11.25%)
Data analysis tool is absent or misidenti!ed. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent or grossly unclear. Findings are not included or are grossly inaccurate.
Summary, Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations
50.4 (18.00%) - 56 (20.00%)
Strengths and limitations of the study are identi!ed. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included. An evaluation of the !ndings, conclusions, and signi!cance to nursing is included and appropriate.
42.56 (15.20%) - 49.84 (17.80%)
Strengths and limitations of the study are somewhat identi!ed. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included but may not be fully developed. An evaluation of the !ndings, conclusions, and signi!cance to nursing may not be fully developed.
33.6 (12.00%) - 42 (15.00%)
Strengths and limitations of study are absent or lacking. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent or lacking. An evaluation of the !ndings, conclusions, and signi!cance to nursing is absent or inappropriate.
Mechanics and APA Format
12.6 (4.50%) - 14 (5.00%)
Written in a clear,
10.64 (3.80%) - 12.46 (4.45%)
Writing is generally
8.4 (3.00%) - 10.5 (3.75%)
Writing is generally
6/2/20, 11:24 PMRubric Detail – OC_NURS350_202004SPII_OL-K
Page 4 of 4https://learn.westcoastuniversity.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/grad…ewOnly=true&displayGrades=false&type=grading&rubricAssoId=_262759_1
Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is appropriately paraphrased and accurately cited.
Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is correctly paraphrased and cited.
Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Some errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.
Name:NURS350-Research Critique
Description:This rubric is used to evaluate the Research Critique Assignment in NURS350.
Exit