ANT RJ DISCUSSION
11/9/23, 9:11 PM Rubric Assessment - Fall 23 Intro to Cultural Anthropology - DePaul University
https://d2l.depaul.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=964709&evalObjectId=893985&evalObjectType=5&userId=171446&groupId… 1/4
Restorative Justice Discussion Board Course: Fall 23 Intro to Cultural Anthropology
WRITING Excellent 25 points
Good Work 20 points
Sufficient 10 points
Insufficient 5 points
Criterion Score
Writing
Requirement
s. 500-700
words
spellchecked
with
appropriate
headings and
divisions.
/ 25500-700
thoughtfully
written words
that are
spellchecked
with
appropriate
headings and
divisions.
Slightly under
word count or
includes
padding words
that reduces
content. Good
writing - spell
checked and
with good
headings and
divisions.
Under word
count or lack
of spell check
or is a solid run
of text without
paragraph
divisions
around
separate ideas.
Solid run of
text that is
barely relevant
to the topic.
Misspelled and
not formatted.
CASE STUDY Excellent 20 points
Good Work 17 points
Insufficient 10 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
11/9/23, 9:11 PM Rubric Assessment - Fall 23 Intro to Cultural Anthropology - DePaul University
https://d2l.depaul.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=964709&evalObjectId=893985&evalObjectType=5&userId=171446&groupId… 2/4
CASE STUDY Excellent 20 points
Good Work 17 points
Insufficient 10 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
Case Study is
about
Restorative
Justice and
Optional
Personal
Story also
provides an
example of
Restorative
Justice.
/ 20Case Study is
written
thoughtful and
explicitly linked
to Restorative
Justice
concepts. Case
study is linked.
Optional
Personal Story
describes
Restorative
Justice
processes (self
or others
Case Study is
explicitly about
Restorative
justice but
described in a
perfunctory
way.
Optional
Personal story
does not relate
to Restorative
Justice
processes but
does shares
meaningfully
with other.
Case Study is is
not explicitly
about
Restorative
Justice and is
perfunctorily
described.
OR
Personal Story
is substituted
for Case Study
No Case Study
or Personal
Story.
TEXTBOOK Excellent 5 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
Uses ideas from the
Robbins and Dowty
text and/or the
introduction to the
module
/ 5Includes ideas from
the text and
introduction on D2L
about the Cultural
Construction of
Violence and the
problems with
incarceration.
Does not reference
anything from the text
or introduction.
LANGUAGE Good 5 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
11/9/23, 9:11 PM Rubric Assessment - Fall 23 Intro to Cultural Anthropology - DePaul University
https://d2l.depaul.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=964709&evalObjectId=893985&evalObjectType=5&userId=171446&groupId… 3/4
LANGUAGE Good 5 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
Care with language
that depersonalizes
/ 5Use of Person-
centered people-first
language. Avoids
words like "criminal"
and "victim".
Uses "Victim" or
"Criminal" or other
forms of carceral
language that
depersonalize those
involved.
OUTSIDE
RESEARCH Excellent 15 points
Sufficient 10 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
Embedded
videos and
hyperlinks to
material you
researched on
your own
/ 15Embedded Videos
and / or
hyperlinks with
titles and not just
urls. Includes
description.
Resources named
but not embedded
or described
No outside
materials provided
IMAGES Excellent 10 points
Sufficient 6 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
Images that you
found on the
web that
illustrate some
of your feelings
and ideas about
this topic.
/ 10Image embedded
and fully visible
with description
Image linked and
described but not
embedded.
No images
COMMENTS Excellent 20 points
Sufficient 13 points
Insufficient 6 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
11/9/23, 9:11 PM Rubric Assessment - Fall 23 Intro to Cultural Anthropology - DePaul University
https://d2l.depaul.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=964709&evalObjectId=893985&evalObjectType=5&userId=171446&groupId… 4/4
Total / 100
Overall Score
COMMENTS Excellent 20 points
Sufficient 13 points
Insufficient 6 points
Missing 0 points
Criterion Score
Commenting
on each
other's work
(at least
three times).
/ 20Three
comments with
good content.
Two comments
with good
content
One comment No comments
A 90 points minimum
B 80 points minimum
C 70 points minimum
D 60 points minimum
F 1 point minimum