evidence based practice
|
A3. Current Practice |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
Description is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of the current practice related to the problem. |
Description is vague or is not relevant to the current practice related to the problem. |
Description is clear, accurate, and reflects the current practice related to the problem. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - A discussion on how adopting a healthier lifestyle is important, however, a discussion on what the current practice is that is leading to the problem of childhood obesity is not found. |
|
B. PICO Table |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
PICO table is not evident or elements provided reflect a basic misunderstanding of the PICO. |
PICO table is incomplete or does not correctly describe all elements of the PICO. |
PICO table is complete and correctly describes all the elements of the PICO. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - A completed PICO table addressing the problem of childhood obesity is included in the submission. The element of comparison (C) needs to reflect the actual current practice that is taking place leading to the problem of childhood obesity though. |
|
C2. Number and Types of Articles |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
Description is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of the literature search topic. |
Description is incomplete (does not include number or types) or is not relevant to the literature search topic. |
Description is complete (includes number and types) and is relevant to the literature search topic. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - The submission states that over 5,000 articles were retrieved in the literature search for evidence on childhood obesity. A complete description on the types (i.e. randomized control trial, meta-analysis, expert opinion, etc.) is not found. |
||
|
|
||
|
D. Evidence Matrix |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
Attachment is not evident, or sources are basically unacceptable (are not from scholarly journals). |
Attachment is incomplete (does not include 5 sources), or the sources are from scholarly journals but not located in major medical databases. |
Attachment is complete (includes 5 sources), and the scholarly journal sources are located in major medical databases. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - An evidence matrix with three level I-III sources of evidence related to the prevention of childhood obesity is provided with the submission. Please identify two additional level I-III sources of evidence to meet the requirement of five sources for the evidence matrix. |
|
E. Recommended Practice Change |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
Explanation is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of the practice change. |
Explanation is vague or does not inform a practice change that addresses the PICO question, or the explanation is not supported by the evidence. |
Explanation is clear, informs a practice change that addresses the PICO question, and is supported by the evidence. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - The submission discusses numerous ways to prevent childhood obesity that were found in the evidence. A robust discussion that focuses on just the recommended practice change of the intervention (I) from the PICO table of adopting to healthy feeding is not located. |
|
F1. Key Stakeholders |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
Explanation is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of how to involve the 3 stakeholders. |
Explanation is vague or does not address how to involve the 3 stakeholders in the decision. |
Explanation is congruent, logical, and addresses how to involve the 3 stakeholders in the decision. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - Key stakeholders of the government, parents and members of the community are identified. It is not discernible in the submission though where a discussion on how each of these key stakeholders would b part of the actual decision to make the recommended practice change. |
|
F1. Key Stakeholders |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
Explanation is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of how to involve the 3 stakeholders. |
Explanation is vague or does not address how to involve the 3 stakeholders in the decision. |
Explanation is congruent, logical, and addresses how to involve the 3 stakeholders in the decision. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - Key stakeholders of the government, parents and members of the community are identified. It is not discernible in the submission though where a discussion on how each of these key stakeholders would b part of the actual decision to make the recommended practice change. |
|
F2. Barriers |
||
|
Not Evident |
Approaching Competence |
Competent |
|
Description is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of specific barriers and applying evidence. |
Description is not relevant, includes general barriers, or vaguely applies the evidence. |
Description is relevant, includes specific barriers, and clearly applies the evidence. |
|
Criterion Score : Approaching Competence Comments on this criterion: 11/23/18 - Barriers of funding for the program and attitude towards childhood obesity are identified. A discussion on how the evidence is applicable to these barriers is not found. |