DSRT topic

Residency: Draft - Introduction and Headings

Hari Priya

University of Cumberland

Jerry Alsay

DSRT736 - M51 Dissertation Seminar

September 17 2021

Impact of Information technology on productivity

Introduction

Productivity is an essential economic metric that plays a significant part in economic growth assessment. It has been recognized as the basis for economic success, the precondition for national growth, and a key indication of an organization's competitiveness.

Strong competitiveness leads to the adoption of new technology to improve the productivity level of company resources. Productivity is one of the key criteria to assess both industry and company economic development. Its expansion leads businesses to expand their share of the market. Productivity is dependent on the economics of companies at the most fundamental level. It is measured as the output-to-input ratio.

From the past, productivity is typically described as the output/critical input ratio, with most other inputs constantly maintained. The basis for economic success, the requirement for national progress, and an important indication of organizational competitiveness seem to be productivity growth—consequently, measured productivity influences national government policy choices and organizational management decisions.

Scope of literature review

Predictive research has the same roots as the explanation in theory. It implies that if we can explain an event before it happens, we anticipate the occurrence by taking into account the previous symptoms. Control is described as a logical result in this kind of study. Moreover, the complexity of the phenomena and the appropriateness of the prediction theory significantly determine effectiveness in a controlled study (Awan, 2016). The research problem thus shows that this study is explanatory. The literary review was first conducted to examine the idea of the link between productions.

Role of IT in manufacturing

The production process is defined as the production or presentation process of the goods. Different studies have examined and assessed the function of IT in the manufacturing process and its impact on productivity, including both industrial and national levels (Oliner 2003). However, the decision-makers who decide to invest in IT are managers who deploy IT for use in their companies and employ investment criteria linked to the company's results. 

Labor productivity and the total factor productivity are definitely one criterion that managers use as a reason to invest in IT systems metrics such as profitability, market share, margins, and product variety and quality.

To comprehend the total effect of IT on the company, it is important first of all to consider the quality effects of integrating IT in the production processes of a company. The past study distinguishes between the use of IT to automate operations, offer better information, and change whole processes. In this example, a retail chain stores cashier may complete a transaction in less time utilizing a computer-based information technology such as a scanner.

The impact of better information enables employees and managers to make more effective choices. For example, store-based information enables managers to manage inventories better. The effects of transformation emerge when a company redesigns a process to substantially increase efficiency. One major distinction between other kinds of capital in the IT capital band is the double function that IT may perform in a company. As with other kinds of capital, IT may, like the data system of a bank, be utilized as a production technology directly for improving worker productivity.

Furthermore, research indicates that IT has its major influence as a coordination technology through its second function and also plays a significant part in the efficient integration of the company's business process in order to enhance the productivity of companies.

Model production function

To get a better understanding of the IT and productivity conversation, it is important to start by discussing the production process by which inputs in companies and economies convert into outputs and the particular function of It as a production component. Inputs are converted into outputs through economists in two related modelling methods. The economy of production, which utilizes particular functional forms, termed production functions, to describe the manufacturing process, is one way to explain the output of an economic system. This method utilizes econometric tools to link the performance of a company, enterprise or industry.

Input economy relies on estimate models generated from the manufacturing function. Generally, work and capital, including IT and non-IT capital are the inputs covered by this method. This method is used by most research at the company level. Growth accounting is the main method used to represent the production process inherent in an economy (or sector). This approach also assumes certain characteristics of the manufacturing process and distributes output shares among different inputs for production on the basis of these predictions.

Growth in output in companies, industries as well as the economy may be caused by increases in input levels, improved input quality, and increased input productivity. 

The framework for the production function was the most often utilized approach for the analysis of IT returns. In the lack of measurements of real IT advantages, cost-benefit analyses cannot be performed for IT investments, and production activities relating to IT expenditure to overall productivity or output actions are thus considered the best option. Hundreds of empirical investigations have demonstrated that production function methods are legitimate and very effective.

The choice of the shape of the production function is limited by the economic theory that criteria like monotonicity and quasi-compatibility need to be met. One of the simplest production functions that meet these criteria is the Cobb-Douglas function, which has been employed for approximately 100 years. This paradigm was utilized by most IT-based adopted by employers.

Literature sequence

IT implementation at a company is typically intended to automate pre-existing activities in an organization. IT cannot significantly increase productivity unless management procedures, including the basic organizational structure, are altered to adapt and exploit the advantages of current IT progress.

BPR approach

Global competitiveness, consumer satisfaction, and environmental and government laws indicate that many companies need significant adjustments to achieve future successes and economic survival. Companies across a wide variety of sectors have re-engineered key internal business processes continuously.

Reengineering includes rethinking and rebuilding the fundamental business processes of a company in order to improve dramatically and rapidly. The reengineering projects failed. A strategy for the implementation of the reengineering program is thus necessary. BPR's strategy implies that the existing regime is rejected and the concept of the enterprises radically changed, and the key performance, quality, capital, service, and productivity metrics are radically improved.

Importance of BPR research

Customers are now so smart and conscious. In addition, there are many options to meet consumer requirements and wishes in the competitive market. Consequently, they want to be personally regarded (Quiroga, 2017). Thus according to Hammer, "time does not include a particular consumer group."

Customers have renewal opinions about the services or products provided. Firstly, people want services or products to meet their wants and wishes to the greatest extent feasible. Secondly, products and services are readily and conveniently accessible and useful.

Improvements and technological developments in recent years have caused the cost of services or products to constantly decrease and businesses to please consumers in their commercial operations. The market is thus considerably more competitive than previously.

Companies should thus have dynamic structures to adapt to continue sustain in the competitive market. And only dynamic and basic processes are important tactics and techniques.

BPR emphasis on business process

BPR methodology It reduces the level of the organization horizontally and links various departments with clients. This performance leads to all components and departments working in accordance with business process definitions, trying to collaborate and accomplish company objectives, and fulfilling clients without regard to departmental borders. Teamwork is set up, and all tasks are linked with the business process, and associated members are accountable for the performance of the business and organization (Liu, 2019). The BPR method allows businesses to identify and exclude unnecessary operations via the business process.

Consequently, the ultimate expenses are significantly reduced.

In addition, the BPR method is designed to enhance business performance reliability. This implies that dramatic changes are made in order to streamline company processes, to abandon the wait and waste activities, reduce the degree of hierarchy, and empower executives to make decisions under the required conditions. In addition, via each business process, BPR strives to improve the productivity of its operations. All such efforts are thus recognized as enhancing the quality of company performance.

.

References:

Awan, M. T., & Aqeel, M (2016). Management of Information Systems for the Productivity of an Organization.

Bessen, J. (2017). Information technology and industry concentration.

Blair, A. (2018). Emotional Intelligence and Performance Productivity of Information Technology Professionals: A Correlational Study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix).

Boddy, D., & Buchanan, D. A. (2012). Information technology and productivity: myths and realities. Omega, 12(3), 233-240.

Breunig, C., Kummer, M., Ohnemus, J., & Viete, S. (2020). Information technology outsourcing and firm productivity: eliminating bias from selective missingness in the dependent variable. The Econometrics Journal, 23(1), 88-114.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Yang, S. (1996). Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature. Advances in computers, 43, 179-214.

Casolaro, L., & Gobbi, G. (2007). Information technology and productivity changes in the banking industry. Economic Notes, 36(1), 43-76.

Dewan, S., & Kraemer, K. L. (2000). Information technology and productivity: evidence from country-level data. Management science, 46(4), 548-562.

Katemukda, N., Sudasna-na-Ayudthya, P., Comepa, N., & Kropsu-Vehkapera, H. (2018). Productivity enhancement through intellectual capital and information technology. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 267-280.

Fuglie, K., Gautam, M., Goyal, A., & Maloney, W. F. (2019). Harvesting prosperity: Technology and productivity growth in agriculture. World Bank Publications.

FarajAllah, A., El Talla, S. A., Abu-Naser, S. S., & Al Shobaki, M. J. (2018). The impact of technological and human requirements for re-engineering processes in improving productivity.

Hajli, M., Sims, J. M., & Ibragimov, V. (2015). Information technology (IT) productivity paradox in the 21st century. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

Hawash, R., & Lang, G. (2010). The impact of information technology on productivity in developing countries. Faculty of Management Technology Working paper, (19).

Kudyba, S., & Diwan, R. K. (2002). Information technology, corporate productivity, and the new economy. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Liu, T. K. (2019). The Impact of Information Technology on Total Factor Productivity. Emerging Issues and Development in Economics and Trade Vol. 2, 116-123.

Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (2003). Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going?. In Technology, Growth, and the Labor Market (pp. 41-94). Springer, Boston, MA.

Quinn, J. B., & Baily, M. N. (1994). Information technology: increasing productivity in services. Academy of Management Perspectives, 8(3), 28-48.

Quiroga-Parra, D. J., Torrent-Sellens, J., & Murcia-Zorrilla, C. P. (2017). Information technology in latin america, its impact on productivity: A comparative analysis with developed countries. Dyna, 84(200), 281-290.

Reardon, J., Hasty, R., & Coe, B. (1996). The effect of information technology on productivity in retailing. Journal of retailing, 72(4), 445-461.

Stiroh, K., & Botsch, M. (2007). Information technology and productivity growth in the 2000s. German Economic Review, 8(2), 255-280.

Sichel, D. E., & Oliner, S. D. (2002). Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going?. Available at SSRN 318692.