resource dependence theory

Written Report

Excellent (A)

Good (B)

C+

or less acceptable

Research depth –from robust source scholarly journals.

Exhaustive research demonstrated by extent of references, particularly relevant sources

Thorough research demonstrated by comprehensive references, highly relevant sources

Inadequate research; failure to include pertinent references; use of inappropriate sources

Analysis of viewpoints

In-depth analysis, presented very clearly; well supported by textbook citations and current scholarly sources.

Solid analysis, clearly presented; well supported by relevant sources (for at least one viewpoint).

Major weaknesses in analysis, such that it is incorrect or lacking.

Consideration of issue

Comprehensive review of problems, choices and rationale

Considerable review of problems, choices and rationale

Failure to consider problems, or choices; rationale incoherent

Support for arguments/points of main issue

Clear, concise essay argument/stance and fully supported with evidence/research (e.g., examples) or explained.

Clear argument and conclusions, well supported

Inadequate or no argument; conclusions not supported

Bibliography and supporting documentation

Comprehensive, relevant and flawlessly presented

Thorough, relevant and well presented

Inadequate, not relevant or poorly presented

Writing style

Excellent use of language in clear, interesting manner

Appropriate, clear expression, which flows freely

Inappropriate expression, very confused, difficult to follow

Organization

All components are well organized and logical; exceeds content required (value added additions)

Most components are well organized and logical; includes all required content

Lacks organization and logic; required content missing

Form

Flawless grammar, spelling; exactly meets all presentation requirements

Reasonable grammar, spelling; meets all presentation requirements

Unacceptable errors in grammar, spelling; does not meet presentation requirements