Government Methodology and Analysis Article Evaluation Assignment
Criteria Ratings Points
Research Methods Knowledge & Understanding
33 to >29 pts
Advanced
• Shows a deep understanding of research methods and offers an article evaluation with measurable dependent and independent variables, a measurable research question, theory supported by the literature that corresponds matching the individual research plan proposed in the Abstract.
29 to >27 pts
Proficient
• Missing one of the following: an article evaluation with measurable dependent and independent variables, a measurable research question, theory supported by the literature that corresponds matching the individual research plan proposed in the Abstract.
27 to >0 pts
Developing
• Missing two or more of the following: an article evaluation with measurable dependent and independent variables, a measurable research question, theory supported by the literature that corresponds matching the individual research plan proposed in the Abstract.
0 pts
Not Present
33 pts
Selected Peer-Reviewed Article Evaluation
33 to >29 pts
Advanced
• Includes sections that conform to high quality research standards: Review includes all background information with a description of independent variables, dependent variables, instruments, and an explanation of the research design that corresponds with what is reported in the research plan as proposed in the Abstract and is a match with the reviewed peer-reviewed article.
29 to >27 pts
Proficient
• Missing one of the following or an area does not represent high quality research standards: Review includes all background information with a description of independent variables, dependent variables, instruments, and an explanation of the research design that corresponds with what is reported in the research plan as proposed in the Abstract and is a match with the reviewed peer-reviewed article.
27 to >0 pts
Developing
• Missing two or more of the following and/or an area does not represent high quality research standards: Review includes all background information with a description of independent variables, dependent variables, instruments, and an explanation of the research design that corresponds with what is reported in the research plan as proposed in the Abstract and is a match with the reviewed peer-reviewed article.
0 pts
Not Present
33 pts
Research Report: Research Methodology and Analysis Article Evaluation Grading Rubric | PADM805_D03_202520
Criteria Ratings Points
Methodology, subjects, findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research
32 to >28 pts
Advanced
• Includes sections that conform to high quality research standards: Explanation of subjects, data collection technique, findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research. Scripture/biblical principles where appropriate.
28 to >26 pts
Proficient
Missing one of the following or an area does not represent high quality research standards: Explanation of subjects, data collection technique, findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research. Scripture/biblical principles where appropriate.
26 to >0 pts
Developing
Missing two or more of the following and/or an area does not represent high quality research standards: Explanation of subjects, data collection technique, findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research. Scripture/biblical principles where appropriate.
0 pts
Not Present
32 pts
References 19 to >16 pts
Advanced
The reference included is from an acceptable peer reviewed journal (e.g. scholarly peer-reviewed articles), evidence is provided that the article is peer-reviewed (impact factor, etc.), and the article citation is formatted according to the most updated APA Style Manual.
16 to >15 pts
Proficient
There is a deficiency in one of these areas: The reference included is from an acceptable peer reviewed journal (e.g. scholarly peer-reviewed articles), evidence is provided that the article is peer-reviewed (impact factor, etc.), and the article citation is formatted according to the most updated APA Style Manual.
15 to >0 pts
Developing
There are deficiencies in two or more of the following areas: The reference included is from an acceptable peer reviewed journal (e.g. scholarly peer-reviewed articles), evidence is provided that the article is peer-reviewed (impact factor, etc.), and the article citation is formatted according to the most updated APA Style Manual.
0 pts
Not Present
19 pts
Grammar, Spelling & APA
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, or APA.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Some errors in grammar, spelling, or APA.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, or APA.
0 pts
Not Present
15 pts
Research Report: Research Methodology and Analysis Article Evaluation Grading Rubric | PADM805_D03_202520
Criteria Ratings Points
Paper Length 8 to >7 pts
Advanced
Paper is between 10 and 15 pages, not including references, using Times New Roman 12 Point Font, double spaced, with 1 inch margins.
7 to >6 pts
Proficient
Paper is missing one of the following: Paper is between 10 and 15 pages, not including references, using Times New Roman 12 Point Font, double spaced, with 1 inch margins.
6 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper missing two or more of the following: Paper is between 10 and 15 pages, not including references, using Times New Roman 12 Point Font, double spaced, with 1 inch margins.
0 pts
Not Present
8 pts
Total Points: 140
Research Report: Research Methodology and Analysis Article Evaluation Grading Rubric | PADM805_D03_202520