Marketing Research Assignment

raintr33
ResearchProposal_EXAMPLE1.pdf

1

Group Final Research Project

2

Table of Contents

Problem Definition ......................................................................................................................... 3

Overview of The Coca-Cola Company ................................................................................... 3

Background to the problem..................................................................................................... 4

MDP: ................................................................................................................................................. 5

MRP .................................................................................................................................................. 5

MRO’s ............................................................................................................................................... 5

Rationale of the MRO’s .............................................................................................................. 5

Method ................................................................................................................................................ 6

Research Design .......................................................................................................................... 6

Method of Administration ........................................................................................................ 7

Sampling Technique ................................................................................................................... 8

Evaluation .......................................................................................................................................... 9

Ethical Considerations .............................................................................................................. 9

Potential Limitations ............................................................................................................... 10

Timeline ....................................................................................................................................... 11

Rational Link to MRO’s ............................................................................................................ 11

Appendix .......................................................................................................................................... 12

One ................................................................................................................................................. 12

Focus Group – Moderators Guide ............................................................................................ 12

General Introduction ............................................................................................................... 12

Directions ..................................................................................................................................... 12

Group Interaction ................................................................................................................................ 12

Game – “Fact or Fiction” ................................................................................................................... 12

Dialogue of required topics to cover .................................................................................. 13

Closing Questions and Answers ..................................................................................................... 16

Reference List ................................................................................................................................. 17

3

Problem Definition

Overview of The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) is the world’s largest beverage company and operates

in more than 200 countries (The Coca-Cola Company, 2011). TCCC has more than 3,500

beverage products and manufactures concentrate, beverage bases, and syrups and sells

these ingredients to bottling operations(The Coca-Cola Company, 2011). Marketing

activities primarily consist of print and televised advertisements, online programs,

retail store displays, sponsorships, contests and package design (The Coca-Cola

Company, 2011). The focus of TCCC is on the creation of beverages and marketing them

in order to effectively meet the diverse and dynamic needs and desires of consumers

globally (The Coca-Cola Company, 2011). TCCC prides itself on being innovative and

claims that this is what sets them apart from their competitors (The Coca-Cola

Company, 2011).

TCCC is close to world dominance of the soft-drink beverage industry (Chaurasia, 2005).

In the U.S.A TCCC captures 44 per cent of the market compared to Pepsi’s 31 per cent, it

also outperforms Pepsi 3 to 1 overseas and boasts the world’s five leading soft-drink

brands (Chaurasia, 2005). Pepsi is still a fierce competitor to TCCC and is now

emphasising its efforts abroad by focusing on emerging markets such as China, India

and Indonesia (Chaurasia, 2005). These markets comprise of half the world’s total

population (Chaurasia, 2005). With their young demographic, exploding incomes and

underdeveloped soft-drink market they represent major potential for TCCC and Pepsi

(Chaurasia, 2005).

4

Background to the problem

Few brands can boast the long term success of TCCC (McElhatton, 2011). Now

celebrating its 125th anniversary there are many aspects of TCCC to admire:

idiosyncratic packaging, global distribution and consistent advertising (McElhatton,

2011). However, there are many challenges in the global marketplace (Washinski,

2011) and TCCC’s other beverage products have not matched the popularity of its core

product; Coke (McElhatton, 2011). TCCC’s mission is to deliver long-term sustainable

growth and value for stakeholders (Washinski, 2011) and its principal marketing

challenge is concerned with maintaining consumers’ attention (McElhatton, 2011).

TCCC was an international brand by 1900 and by 1926 created a “Foreign Department”

in order to distribute Coca-Cola globally (Daft,2000). This was regarded highly

successful and TCCC was a very successful global corporation following the Second

World War (Daft, 2000). TCCC claims this success was determined by their locally

minded attitude and complimented by a decentralised business model

whereresponsibility was held solely with the managers in the individual organisations

(Daft, 2000). During the mid 1980’s TCCC began to move to more centralised operations

sanctioning more efficient services and reduced costs (Daft, 2000). Eventually, the rapid

pace and uncertainty of global markets combined to create a “second wave of

globalisation” (Daft, 2000:p607). Various societies and governments now respond to

globalisation with hesitance, and guard their politics, culture and brands from overseas

threats (Daft, 2000). Following all the benefits from TCCC’s initial wave of globalisation,

they had undermined their image of being a truly local brand which resulted in

decreased volume growth and a drop in revenue (Daft, 2000).

5

MDP:

Should TCCC introduce a new product to increase their market share in the beverage

industry?

MRP

What are consumers’ attitudes towards TCCC’s current product range?

MRO’s

1. To explore consumers’ attitudes towards TCCC’s current product range.

2. To compare consumers’preference of the TCCC’s current product range

to competitors in the beverage industry.

3. To determine what attracts consumers’ to TCCC’s product range.

Rationale of the MRO’s

This research is concerned with TCCC’s competition in the global marketplace and is a

situation analysis of TCCC in order to clarify a potential problem and whether

introducing a new product will be a success. Exploratory research can indicate which

product TCCC should introduce to its product range and the best ones to pursue

(Zikmund et al., 2007). This research is useful to gauge future direction for TCCC in

order to rectify the research problem (Zikmund et al., 2007).

6

Method

Research Design

This report will be conducting exploratory research to understand consumer’s attitudes

towards TCCC’s current product range, their preferences between TCCC and

competitors and what attracts them towards these products. Exploratory research

provokesfurther understanding of a marketing concept and crystallises a problem that

is qualitative, rather than providing a quantitative measurement (Zikmund et al.,

2007).Qualitative research will enable TCCC to achieve these objectives.

According to Ruyter and Scholl (1998, p8) “Qualitative research does not measure, it

provides insight.This insight can be gained through a process consisting of analysis and

meaningful integration of views expressed by respondents”

Exploratory research has the potential to uncover potential elements of the TCCC

current product range that are deemed unfeasible (Zikmund et al., 2007).

7

Method of Administration

The method of administration that will be employed for this qualitative research is a

focus group (FG).

Greenbaum (1988, p10) defines a focus group to be:

“A focus group consist of a discussion about a topic of particular interest to a client

organization amongst eight to ten people led by a trained moderator.”

A FG is an unstructured, free-flowing group interview, whereby the relevant research

topic is discussed amongst the respondents (Zikmund et al., 2007). The moderator

leading the group needs to be highly skilled in moderating as well as having a thorough

understanding of the topic being discussed (Zikmund et al., 2007).

The moderator’s role in a FG is vital. They are to guide, but not lead, the group

discussion into relevant topic areas relevant to the current research problem (Zikmund

et al., 2007). The moderator should become familiar with the different personalities in

the group before progressing to the relaxed discussion. This enables the moderator to

gage which personalities may require more ‘probing’ then other (Zikmund et al., 2007).

The probing technique requires the moderator to ask further questions to

produceadditional information from respondents (Zikmund et al., 2007).

A FG technique was selected for TCCCsresearch design to provide the company with

insight into consumer’s attitudes towards theirs and competing products and to

generate potential product ideas and company direction. The relaxed structure of

questioning and the free flow of conversation and idea generation made it an ideal

choice for TCCC to thoroughly explore topic areas. Similarly, the technique allows for

numerous topic areas to be discussed, for example, TCCCs entire product range

compared to competition.

Please see appendix one for TCCC moderators guide.

8

Sampling Technique

TCCC has such a diverse range of consumers therefore the sample frame for the

research will be from the yellow pages in Newcastle Australia. According to Fletcher

and Crawford (2011) Newcastle has similar characteristics to the average of Australia.

To obtain a realistic indication of the population the sample technique will be

probability sampling and the sampling procedure that will be used will be stratified

sampling. It involves selecting strata of the population, which are mutually exclusive

from one another. Morgan (1996) states that in regards to focus groups segmenting the

sample, therefore selecting strata, can generate discussion of participants who are

similar to each other and it can build a comparative dimension to the project, such as

data analysis. This can include segmenting the sample by age and sex. Participants may

feel more comfortable in the focus groups with people of the same sex and age. The

Focus group for TCCC will be separated into the strata of both sex and age. Males and

females from the ages of 16-54 will be target population participating in the focus

groups in order to discuss attitudes towards TCCC and competitors. The strata’s will be

proportionate to the population, so that it is a true representation of the population.

This form of sampling will be effective in generating discussion on attitudes towards

TCCC and its competitors.

9

Evaluation

Ethical Considerations

Through conducting market research there are several ethical issues that it raises which

the TCCC need to consider and monitor. Michaelides and Gibbs (2006) identify that the

issue with ethics in market research revolves around the relationship between the

general public, respondent, client and the researcher. The marketing research process is

focused on creating knowledge that consumers can end up becoming a tool used for

increasing consumption. They also identify that ethics need to not just be applied to the

outcomes but the ethics of the outputs as well. This means that TCCC should not take

advantage people through market research but they should not exploit them by creating

needs to increase its profit.

The ethical concerns of focus groups are recognised by Smith (1995). He identifies that

focus groups do not have close personal involvement and they are short-term. Focus

groups are interactive and an individual’s input exists in a social context, sometimes

participants may over share personal information to both the researcher and

participants. This raises privacy issues between participants. Another issue is that the

processes can become stressful for participants and the moderator should be aware of

how they feel after the session. The researcher should not put the participants in a

harmful situation, both physical and psychological.

10

Potential Limitations

A potential limitation of this research technique is the lack of generalizability of the data

collected from the FGs, to the Australian population. Whilst the sampling technique

employed does try to overcome this, the nature and small size of a focus group mean

that the results will not translate to the entire population. (Zikmund et al., 2007)

Kristy & Wood (1999, p189) “Unlike quantitative research, much reliance has to be

placed on the researcher's interpretation of the data collected, rather than on the

suitability or robustness of a particular technique of statistical analysis.”

The subjective nature of the FG is a foundation for potential limitations in the research.

Researcher and moderator bias will act as a potential limitation in this research design.

The predispositions they process will influence how they interpret the data and thus the

results inferred from this data may not be completely accurate.

Smithson (2000, p 105) proposes “Focus groups, then, should not be analysed as if they

are naturally occurring discussions, but as discussions occurring in a specific, controlled

setting.”

This provokes the idea that while many marketers view a focus group to be analysed as

a free flowing, natural conversation, it is actually somewhat artificial and the data

collected from here should be treated accordingly. There is the potential,the views and

opinions of the participants will not be a true and accurate representation of their

attitudes. Participating respondents may feel pressured to provide responses they

assume the moderator wishes to hear, however these responses may not be aligned to

their true opinions.

Respondents in the focus group will naturally possess different personality types

(Zikmund et al., 2007). The stronger, more dominant personalities in the group can

prove to be intimidating to other respondents and so deter the ‘shyer’ respondents from

contributing.

Greenbaum (1988) raises the concern of group conversation being skewed by the

opinion of the dominant respondent. A group ‘norm’ may develop and respondents may

feel pressure to comply with this norm rather than to voice their different opinion. In

this case the data collected will be inaccurate (Greenbaum, 1998).

11

Timeline

Step 1: Defining the research

Step 2 & 3: Research Design and Sampling

Step 4: Data Collection

Step 5: Data Preparation and Analysis

Step 6: Report Preparation and Presentation

Rational Link to MRO’s

The MRO’s will investigate consumer attitudes towards products in the beverage

industry. Discussion between the samples in the focus group on desirable and

undesirable product characteristics will be helpful in shedding light on consumer tastes.

This will be constructive in determining if TCCC should introduce a new product into

the highly competitive market. The different age groups may have dissimilar wants and

needs, which can impact on their attitudes towards specific products.

12

Appendix

One

Focus Group – Moderators Guide

General Introduction

Good Morning and welcome. My name is Jane Doe and I will be conducting the focus group today on

behalf of TCCC.

Thank you all for joining us. The aim of today is to create discussion and gain feedback (positive and

negative) with regard to the TCCC and their competitor’s current product ranges. Your feedback and

suggestions will enable TCCC to improve the current product range and provide direction for our

future.

Directions

Over the next 2 hours I will be recording the discussion. I encourage you all to contribute as much as

possible as we value all the feedback, both positive and negative.

Group Interaction

Allow the group members to move around the room, make sociable small talk and consume

refreshments and snacks provided. The moderator can use this time to identify participant’s

personality types, i.e. “shy” and “dominant” personalities.

Game – “Fact or Fiction”

Each group member is to write down one true statement and one false statement about themselves.

Participants take it in turn to read out their two statements. The rest of the group guesses which

statement is the “fact” and which is “fiction.” The participant then reveals if the rest of the group

guessed correctly.

13

Dialogue of required topics to cover

Soft Drinks – TCCC

 Do you know what soft drinks TCCC make? List known products.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase TCCC soft drinks?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of TCCC soft drinks?

Soft Drinks – Pepsi

 Do you know what soft drinks Pepsi make? List known products.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase Pepsi soft drinks?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of Pepsi soft drinks?

Soft Drinks

 In what situations will you purchase soft drinks?

 Which brand of soft drink do you prefer? Why?

Energy Drinks– TCCC

 Do you know what energy drinks TCCC make? List known products.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase TCCC energy drinks?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of TCCC soft drinks?

14

Energy Drinks – Competition

 What other brands of energy drinks do you purchase?

 What do you like / dislike about each of these products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase these energy drinks?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of energy drinks?

Energy Drinks

 In what situations will you purchase energy drinks?

 Which brand of energy drink do you prefer? Why?

Sports Drinks– TCCC

 Do you know what sports drinks TCCC make? List known products.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase TCCC sports drinks?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of TCCC sports drinks?

Sports Drinks – Competition

 What other brands of sports drinks do you purchase?

 What do you like / dislike about each of these products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase these sports drinks?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of these sports drinks?

15

Sports Drinks

 In what situations will you purchase sports drinks?

 Which brand of sports drink do you prefer? Why?

Tea – TCCC

 Do you know what tea’s TCCC make? List known products.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase TCCC tea?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of TCCC tea?

Tea - Competition

 Are you familiar with any other brand of tea? List known brands.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase other brands of tea?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of other brands of tea?

Tea

 Which brand of tea do you prefer? Why?

 In what situations will you purchase tea?

Nutrient / Vitamin Water (NVW) – TCCC

 Do you know what NVW TCCC make? List known products.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not?

16

o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase TCCC NVW?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of TCCC NVW?

Nutrient / Vitamin Water - Competition

 Are you familiar with any other brand of NVW? List known brands.

 What do you like / dislike about each of their products?

 Do you like the products: o Taste? Why / Why not? o Price? Why / Why not? o Packaging? Why / Why not? o Beverage size? Why / Why not?

 Is the beverage’s nutritional / sugar content an important consideration? Why / Why not?

 Why do you purchase other brands of NVW?

 What factors affects your purchase decision of other brands of NVW?

Nutrient / Vitamin Water

 Which brand of NVW do you prefer? Why?

 In what situations will you purchase NVW?

General

 When purchasing any beverage, what are the key factors that affect your purchase decision?

 When purchasing any beverage, how important is the product’s: o Eco-friendliness. Why / why not? o Packaging. Why / why not?

Closing Questions and Answers Recap all topics and opinions that were discussed.

Does anyone have any questions, queries or further comments relating to todays topics?

This concludes our group discussion for today. Thank you for your time and opinions; they are highly

valued by TCCC.

17

Reference List Chaurasia, S. (2005), A Comparative Study of Coke and Pepsi. Available from:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/42433934/Comparative-StudyCOCO-COLA-vs-

Pepsi[Accessed: August 23, 2011].

Christy, R., & Wood, M., (1999) Researching Possibilities in Marketing Qualitative Market Research:

An International Journal 2(3) p 189-196

Daft, D.N. (2000), "Globalization: Connecting with consumers", Vital Speeches of the Day, pp. 606-

608.

Fletcher, R. & Crawford, H.(2011). International Marketing: An Asia-Pacific Perspective 5th ed.

Pearson, Australia: Frenchs Forest

Greenbaum, T.L., (1988) The Practical Handbook and Guide to Focus Group Research, Lexington

(Massachusetts): Lexington Books

Jannarone, J. (2011), "Pepsi-Coke Wars Bubbling Back to Surface", The Wall Street Journal, Jul 25,

p.10.

McElhatton., N. (2011), "Coca-Cola's life lessons", Marketing, pp. 25.

Michaelides, P. & Gibbs, P. (2006). ‘Technical skills and the ethics of market research’.Business

Ethics: A European Review, 15(1): 44-52.

Morgan, D. L. (1996).‘Focus Groups’.Annual Review of Sociology,22:129–52

Rosenberger, P.J., (1996) Focus Groups: An Introduction for the Uninitiated Marketing Group,

University of Newcastle

Ruyter, K.D., & Scholl, N., (1998) Positioning qualitative market research: reflections from theory and

practice Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 1(1) p 7-14

Smith, M. W.(1995). ‘Ethics in Focus Groups: A Few Concerns’. Qualitative Health Research, 5(4):478-

486.

Smithson, J., (2000) Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities International

Journal of Social Research Methodology 3(2) p 103-119

The Coca-Cola Company (2011), The Coca-Cola Company Profile. Available from:

http://www.thecoca-

colacompany.com/ourcompany/innovation_products.html[Accessed: August 17, 2011].

Waschinski, G. (2011), "Coke celebrates 125 years of being 'the real thing' ", The Sydney Morning

Herald, May 8, p.27.

Zickmund, W. G., Ward, S., Lowe, B. &Winzar, H. (2007), Marketing Research,Cengage Learning,

Melbourne, p.60-80