Can you answer this question ?
Criteria Ratings Points
Content: Introduction, Literature Review
52 to >47 pts
Advanced
Key points concisely summarized with balance, clarity, and relevance and are supported by research citations.
47 to >43 pts
Proficient
Most key points summarized with clarity, and relevance and are supported by research citations.
43 to >0 pts
Developing
While some key points are addressed, there is a lack of focus and important information is neglected and/or sufficient research citations are not provided.
0 pts
Not Present
52 pts
Research Design
35 to >31 pts
Advanced
A sound research design (i.e., Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, Correlational, Causal-Comparative, Qualitative Phenomenology, Qualitative Case Study, Qualitative Ethnography) and theoretical or conceptual framework are proposed that are relevant to the research topic and research question(s). Appropriate references are provided to justify methodological choices.
31 to >28 pts
Proficient
A sound research design (i.e., Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, Correlational, Causal-Comparative, Qualitative Phenomenology, Qualitative Case Study, Qualitative Ethnography) and theoretical or conceptual framework are proposed, but alignment between these elements and the research question(s) and research topic is not clear. Some references are provided to justify methodological choices, but more are needed.
28 to >0 pts
Developing
A research design (i.e., Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, Correlational, Causal-Comparative, Qualitative Phenomenology, Qualitative Case Study, Qualitative Ethnography) and theoretical or conceptual framework are proposed, but they are not appropriate to the research question(s) and research topic. Few or no references are provided to justify methodological choices.
0 pts
Not Present
35 pts
Research Methodology Presentation Grading Rubric | EDUC798_B02_202430
Criteria Ratings Points
Data Collection And Analysis
35 to >31 pts
Advanced
Sound data collection and data analysis strategies are proposed that are appropriate to the stated research design. Appropriate references are provided to justify the proposed data collection and analysis strategies.
Includes all 4 of the following: • Discussion of data gathering methods (Qualitative designs) OR data collection protocol and instrumentation (Quantitative designs) • Sample Population (to include demonstration of Social responsibility [SCRIP] by including a specific sampling strategy (i.e., random sampling, purposeful convenience sampling, etc.), desired sample size, and steps taken to ensure as diverse a sample as possible for the topic) • Discussion of data analysis strategy (Qualitative designs) OR chosen statistical analysis (Quantitative designs) • Discussion of trustworthiness (Qualitative designs) OR validity and reliability (Quantitative designs)
31 to >28 pts
Proficient
Sound data collection and data analysis strategies are proposed, but alignment between these elements and the stated research design is not clear. Some references are provided to justify the proposed data collection and analysis strategies, but more are needed.
Includes 3 of the following: • Discussion of data gathering methods (Qualitative designs) OR data collection protocol and instrumentation (Quantitative designs) • Sample Population (to include demonstration of Social responsibility [SCRIP] by including a specific sampling strategy (i.e., random sampling, purposeful convenience sampling, etc.), desired sample size, and steps taken to ensure as diverse a sample as possible for the topic) • Discussion of data analysis strategy (Qualitative designs) OR chosen statistical analysis (Quantitative designs) • Discussion of trustworthiness (Qualitative designs) OR validity and reliability (Quantitative designs)
28 to >0 pts
Developing
Data collection and data analysis strategies are proposed, but are not appropriate to the stated research design. Few or no references are provided to justify the proposed data collection and analysis strategies.
Includes 1-2 of the following: • Discussion of data gathering methods (Qualitative designs) OR data collection protocol and instrumentation (Quantitative designs) • Sample Population (to include demonstration of Social responsibility [SCRIP] by including a specific sampling strategy (i.e., random sampling, purposeful convenience sampling, etc.), desired sample size, and steps taken to ensure as diverse a sample as possible for the topic) • Discussion of data analysis strategy (Qualitative designs) OR chosen statistical analysis (Quantitative designs) • Discussion of trustworthiness (Qualitative designs) OR validity and reliability (Quantitative designs)
0 pts
Not Present
35 pts
Research Methodology Presentation Grading Rubric | EDUC798_B02_202430
Criteria Ratings Points
Sentence Structure
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. Writing displays concise, interesting and focused introductory and concluding sentences.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Sentences are well-phrased and there is some variety in length and structure. Writing displays clear introductory and concluding sentences.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is occasionally distracted. Writing displays vague introductory and concluding sentence.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Mechanics and Current APA Format
33 to >29 pts
Advanced
The writing is free of errors.
29 to >27 pts
Proficient
There are few (1-3) errors, but they do not represent a major distraction or obscure meaning.
27 to >0 pts
Developing
The writing has many errors.
0 pts
Not Present
33 pts
Slide Elements And Design
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The slides are visually interesting. Numerous uses of graphics, images, pictures, and/or charts. No typos. Selected font style and color are easy to read against slide background color.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Most slides read with ease and include pertinent information. Limited use of graphics, images, pictures, and/or charts. Appropriate text and slides for purpose.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Difficult to read, too much information on slide. Few or no use of graphics, images, pictures, and/or charts. Numerous typos.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 175
Research Methodology Presentation Grading Rubric | EDUC798_B02_202430