Education Research Design Project: Quantitative and Program Evaluation Analysis Matrix Assignment
Criteria Ratings Points
Content: Basic Research Article: Quantitative Research Design (QUAN-B)
33 to >29 pts
Advanced
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Supported results, limitations, and implications with page/paragraph numbers. Provided detailed information on results (technical and layman's interpretation), limitations, and implications. Thoroughly discussed how stakeholders other than researchers can use the information from the findings and how (school districts, principals, teachers, parents, etc.) Provided at least 2 great ideas for future research not already listed in the study. Described in detail their connection or experience (previous or present) with the topic/issue in study (not that you will be researching it). Thoroughly explained how they will be able to use this article in their future research. Clearly made a biblical connection with the findings of the study, integrating at least 1 Bible verse.
29 to >27 pts
Proficient
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Supported results, limitations, and implications with page/paragraph numbers. For the most part, information was clear and correct but may have been incomplete or unclear in no more than 2 of the categories below: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse)
27 to >0 pts
Developing
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Provided page/paragraph numbers for some of the following: results, limitations, and implications. Was missing one item and/or provided incorrect or unclear information on more than two of the following items: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse)
0 pts
Not Present
Was missing more than two of the required items: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse) Missing most of the page/paragraph numbers where required.
/ 33 pts
Research Design Project: Quantitative and Program Evaluation Analysis Matrix Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Content: Applied Research Article: Quantitative Research Design (QUAN-A)
33 to >29 pts
Advanced
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Supported results, limitations, and implications with page/paragraph numbers. Provided detailed information on results (technical and layman's interpretation), limitations, and implications. Thoroughly discussed how stakeholders other than researchers can use the information from the findings and how (school districts, principals, teachers, parents, etc.) Provided at least 2 great ideas for future research not already listed in the study. Described in detail their connection or experience (previous or present) with the topic/issue in study (not that you will be researching it). Thoroughly explained how they will be able to use this article in their future research. Clearly made a biblical connection with the findings of the study, integrating at least 1 Bible verse.
29 to >27 pts
Proficient
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Supported results, limitations, and implications with page/paragraph numbers. For the most part, information was clear and correct but may have been incomplete or unclear in no more than 2 of the categories below: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse)
27 to >0 pts
Developing
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Provided page/paragraph numbers for some of the following: results, limitations, and implications. Was missing one item and/or provided incorrect or unclear information on more than two of the following items: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse)
0 pts
Not Present
Was missing more than two of the required items: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse) Missing most of the page/paragraph numbers where required.
/ 33 pts
Research Design Project: Quantitative and Program Evaluation Analysis Matrix Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Content: Program Evaluation Article: Quantitative Research Design (PE-QUAN, PE-QUAL, or PE-MM)
33 to >29 pts
Advanced
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Supported results, limitations, and implications with page/paragraph numbers. Provided detailed information on results (technical and layman's interpretation), limitations, and implications. Thoroughly discussed how stakeholders other than researchers can use the information from the findings and how (school districts, principals, teachers, parents, etc.) Provided at least 2 great ideas for future research not already listed in the study. Described in detail their connection or experience (previous or present) with topic/issue in study (not that you will be researching it). Thoroughly explained how they will be able to use this article in their future research. Clearly made a biblical connection with the findings of the study, integrating at least 1 Bible verse.
29 to >27 pts
Proficient
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Supported results, limitations, and implications with page/paragraph numbers. For the most part, information was clear and correct but may have been incomplete or unclear in no more than 2 of the categories below: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse)
27 to >0 pts
Developing
Put correct study in correct table with full reference. Provided page/paragraph numbers for some of the following: results, limitations, and implications. Was missing one item and/or provided incorrect or unclear information on more than two of the following items: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse)
0 pts
Not Present
Was missing more than two of the required items: a. Results b. Limitations c. Implications d. How stakeholders can use information e. Ideas for future research not already in study f. Connection or experience with topic (other than research interest) g. Explanation of how this article can be used in their future research h. Biblical connection with findings (with 1 Bible verse) Missing most of the page/paragraph numbers where required.
/ 33 pts
Research Design Project: Quantitative and Program Evaluation Analysis Matrix Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure: Mechanics/APA Format
36 to >32 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the pre-matrix table. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are 0–2 minor errors in current APA format.
32 to >29 pts
Proficient
There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. There are 3-4 minor errors in current APA format.
29 to >0 pts
Developing
There are 6+ errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that distract the reader from the content. AND/OR There are 5+ errors in current APA format.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 36 pts
Total Points: -
Research Design Project: Quantitative and Program Evaluation Analysis Matrix Grading Rubric