picot as attached
The REPORT is to be a scholarly review of the evidence related to a clinical question developed by the student.It is worth 15% of the course grade.
· The clinical question will be submitted for approval by the course instructor prior to the topic being written on.
· IT r will be evaluated for correct grammar, spelling, writing mechanics, and APA forma is to be 10-12 pages in length, not including Title page and References.
· The REPORT will include a title page, introduction, review of evidence, recommendations for practice, conclusion, and reference page.It will NOT include an abstract or table of contents.
· Sources: There must be at least 5 peer-reviewed journal sources.Secondary sources, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses may be used, but can only account for 2 of the 5 sources.You may use a text currently in use at SNU School of Nursing for background information, but it will not count as one of the required references.Wikipedia, dictionaries, general newsREPORTs are not considered to be scholarly sources; they should be used very cautiously and will not count as part of the required number of references.
· See the grading rubric for details of the structure and scoring of the REPORT.1. Scoring Breakdown% Final ScorePointsPICOT Question & Key Words510Annotated Bibliography510First Draft1550Final REPORT7580Southern Nazarene University School of Nursing NURS 4336 Formal REPORT Grading RubricCategoryUnacceptable 5Acceptable 7Good 9Excellent 11CommentsIntroduction Provides importance of the topic chosen States the PICOT question Outlines content of the body of the REPORTDoes not adequately address topic Does not introduce subtopics to be discussed in body of textBriefly conveys topic Subtopics to be discussed in body are unclearClearly conveys topic Clear introduction of subtopics to be discussed in body of textStrong topic statement Clear introduction of subtopics to be discussed in body of textFocus and Sequencing a. Literature search b. Appraisal of the evidence c. Review of the evidence d. Discussion of practice implications e. RecommendationContent is not related to topic No logical organization of the subtopics Unclear or nonexistent transitionsContent is related to topic Inconsistent connections between topics and subtopics Inconsistent transitionsContent is clearly related to topic Logical organization of subtopics is evident Clear transitionsContent strongly related to topic Strong, clear organization of subtopics Strong, clear transitionsSupport Peer-reviewed Primary sourcesNo scholarly support of topic Supporting materials are not published within past 5-7 yearsLimited scholarly support of topic Many supporting materials are published within past 5-7 yearsClear scholarly support of topic Most supporting materials are published within past 5-7 yearsStrong scholarly support of topic All supporting materials are published within past 5-7 yearsConclusion Summarizes key points of the REPORT Brings REPORT to closeNo summarization, synthesis, or lacks insightful discussion of topic conclusions New information is introduced into the conclusionSome summarization, synthesis, or insightful discussion of topic conclusions Little new information is introduced into the conclusionClear summarization with synthesis and insightful discussion of topic conclusions No new information is introduced into the conclusionStrong summarization with synthesis and insightful discussion of topic conclusions No new information is introduced into the conclusionGrammar, Spelling, PunctuationSubstantial grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that detract from overall readabilityOccasional grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors that limit overall readabilityMinimal grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors; does not detract from readabilityNo grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.Writing mechanicsMany awkward or unclear passages Informal tone, not consistent with scholarly workMany awkward or unclear passages Inconsistent toneMinimal awkward or unclear passages Consistently formal toneClear, well-written passages Consistently formal toneAPA styleFailure to use APA – 0Substantial
Citation
Nayeri, N. D., Esmaeili, M., Farsi, Z., & Chenari, H. A. (2020). Taking care of experiences of improved comatose patients with traumatic brain injury and their families. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(9), 4815.
Summary of the article:
The report addresses a qualitative content analysis conducted by conducting 16 interviews on 14 participants to assess the relationship between a coma and a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The stated purpose was to examine and describe the caretaking experiences of the patients with coma and the family members during and after any treatment. As a qualitative research study, the research approach mainly involved the consideration of the qualitative data that the participants would give and the effects of the issues they go through. In this study, the researchers selected improved TBI patients and family members to participate in the study's completion. The participants were purposefully selected to ensure that the data collected was quality. They were offered
interviews that sought to assess their recovery rate and how coma had impacted their overall wellbeing. From the data offered in this study, four main themes revolve around the condition and the effect of the patients' conditions. Issues such as crisis, comprehensive support, unprofessional care and communication are the key factors influencing patient satisfaction. The conclusion that the researchers in this study drew was that patients and families are likely to experience a crisis during their stay in the hospital and after being discharged. Family and social support offered to the patients enable them to get psychological wellbeing to overcome most issues. Medical staff need to be very careful when addressing patients' needs because their actions may change the patients' overall health outcome and experience. Additionally, the health providers need to understand that their actions may directly influence the patient outcome based on their actions when sharing any form of information with them. The failure to consider this may affect the patient experience.
Evaluation:
· Critical analysis – the quality of evidence:
· Relevance
Rank: Level 5
Strengths – the use of peer-reviewed journals to support evidence, subsectional study
Weaknesses – participants were purposefully selected
This study is relevant to the topic because it examines the effects of medical practitioners' interventions on patients' quality of health outcomes. From the findings that the researchers in this study found after completing the study, it is worth noting that the role of nurses and their actions to integrate strategies that may encourage positive interactions with the patients may play an essential role in improving the patient outcome. Additionally, this article encourages collaboration with the patients despite their physical wellbeing.she asked us to do PICOT and annoted bilbliograpghy
20 hours ago
PICOT questions
For comatose patients with 65 years and above (P), can the hearing and memory loss (I) be accelerated by old age (C), and can nurses interactions and explaining what they are doing to improve the condition, (O)during the coma period (T)?
Keywords
Stimuli
Hearing
Breathing
Glasgow coma scale
Electrophysiological
PICOT questions
For comatose patients with 65 years and above (P), can the hearing and memory loss (I) be accelerated by old age (C), and can nurses interactions and explaining what they are doing to improve the condition, (O)during the coma period (T)?
Keywords
Stimuli
Hearing
Breathing
Glasgow coma scaleerrors - 2Occasional errors - 3Minimal errors - 4
12 PGS without reference REPORT
The REPORT is to be a scholarly review of the evidence related to a clinical question developed by the student.It is worth 15% of the course grade.
· The clinical question will be submitted for approval by the course instructor prior to the topic being written on.
· The REPORT will be evaluated for correct grammar, spelling, writing mechanics, and APA format
· The REPORT is to be 10-12 pages in length, not including Title page and References.
· The REPORT will include a title page, introduction, review of evidence, recommendations for practice, conclusion, and reference page.It will NOT include an abstract or table of contents.
· Sources: There must be at least 5 peer-reviewed journal sources.Secondary sources, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses may be used, but can only account for 2 of the 5 sources.You may use a text currently in use at SNU School of Nursing for background information, but it will not count as one of the required references.Wikipedia, dictionaries, general newsREPORTs are not considered to be scholarly sources; they should be used very cautiously and will not count as part of the required number of references.
· See the grading rubric for details of the structure and scoring of the REPORT.1. Scoring Breakdown% Final ScorePointsPICOT Question & Key Words510Annotated Bibliography510First Draft1550Final REPORT7580Southern Nazarene University School of Nursing NURS 4336 Formal REPORT Grading RubricCategoryUnacceptable 5Acceptable 7Good 9Excellent 11CommentsIntroduction Provides importance of the topic chosen States the PICOT question Outlines content of the body of the REPORTDoes not adequately address topic Does not introduce subtopics to be discussed in body of textBriefly conveys topic Subtopics to be discussed in body are unclearClearly conveys topic Clear introduction of subtopics to be discussed in body of textStrong topic statement Clear introduction of subtopics to be discussed in body of textFocus and Sequencing a. Literature search b. Appraisal of the evidence c. Review of the evidence d. Discussion of practice implications e. RecommendationContent is not related to topic No logical organization of the subtopics Unclear or nonexistent transitionsContent is related to topic Inconsistent connections between topics and subtopics Inconsistent transitionsContent is clearly related to topic Logical organization of subtopics is evident Clear transitionsContent strongly related to topic Strong, clear organization of subtopics Strong, clear transitionsSupport Peer-reviewed Primary sourcesNo scholarly support of topic Supporting materials are not published within past 5-7 yearsLimited scholarly support of topic Many supporting materials are published within past 5-7 yearsClear scholarly support of topic Most supporting materials are published within past 5-7 yearsStrong scholarly support of topic All supporting materials are published within past 5-7 yearsConclusion Summarizes key points of the REPORT Brings REPORT to closeNo summarization, synthesis, or lacks insightful discussion of topic conclusions New information is introduced into the conclusionSome summarization, synthesis, or insightful discussion of topic conclusions Little new information is introduced into the conclusionClear summarization with synthesis and insightful discussion of topic conclusions No new information is introduced into the conclusionStrong summarization with synthesis and insightful discussion of topic conclusions No new information is introduced into the conclusionGrammar, Spelling, PunctuationSubstantial grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that detract from overall readabilityOccasional grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors that limit overall readabilityMinimal grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors; does not detract from readabilityNo grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.Writing mechanicsMany awkward or unclear passages Informal tone, not consistent with scholarly workMany awkward or unclear passages Inconsistent toneMinimal awkward or unclear passages Consistently formal toneClear, well-written passages Consistently formal toneAPA styleFailure to use APA – 0Substantial errors - 2Occasional errors - 3Minimal errors - 4
Requirements: 12 REPORT without reference REPORTvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Citation
Nayeri, N. D., Esmaeili, M., Farsi, Z., & Chenari, H. A. (2020). Taking care of experiences of improved comatose patients with traumatic brain injury and their families. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(9), 4815.
Summary of the article:
The report addresses a qualitative content analysis conducted by conducting 16 interviews on 14 participants to assess the relationship between a coma and a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The stated purpose was to examine and describe the caretaking experiences of the patients with coma and the family members during and after any treatment. As a qualitative research study, the research approach mainly involved the consideration of the qualitative data that the participants would give and the effects of the issues they go through. In this study, the researchers selected improved TBI patients and family members to participate in the study's completion. The participants were purposefully selected to ensure that the data collected was quality. They were offered
interviews that sought to assess their recovery rate and how coma had impacted their overall wellbeing. From the data offered in this study, four main themes revolve around the condition and the effect of the patients' conditions. Issues such as crisis, comprehensive support, unprofessional care and communication are the key factors influencing patient satisfaction. The conclusion that the researchers in this study drew was that patients and families are likely to experience a crisis during their stay in the hospital and after being discharged. Family and social support offered to the patients enable them to get psychological wellbeing to overcome most issues. Medical staff need to be very careful when addressing patients' needs because their actions may change the patients' overall health outcome and experience. Additionally, the health providers need to understand that their actions may directly influence the patient outcome based on their actions when sharing any form of information with them. The failure to consider this may affect the patient experience.
Evaluation:
· Critical analysis – the quality of evidence:
· Relevance
Rank: Level 5
Strengths – the use of peer-reviewed journals to support evidence, subsectional study
Weaknesses – participants were purposefully selected
This study is relevant to the topic because it examines the effects of medical practitioners' interventions on patients' quality of health outcomes. From the findings that the researchers in this study found after completing the study, it is worth noting that the role of nurses and their actions to integrate strategies that may encourage positive interactions with the patients may play an essential role in improving the patient outcome. Additionally, this article encourages collaboration with the patients despite their physical wellbeing.she asked us to do PICOT and annoted bilbliograpghy
20 hours ago
PICOT questions
For comatose patients with 65 years and above (P), can the hearing and memory loss (I) be accelerated by old age (C), and can nurses interactions and explaining what they are doing to improve the condition, (O)during the coma period (T)?
Keywords
Stimuli
Hearing
Breathing
Glasgow coma scale
Electrophysiological
PICOT questions
For comatose patients with 65 years and above (P), can the hearing and memory loss (I) be accelerated by old age (C), and can nurses interactions and explaining what they are doing to improve the condition, (O)during the coma period (T)?
Keywords
Stimuli
Hearing
Breathing
Glasgow coma scalev
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV