Suggestions for the development of tourist destinations

Zoe12138
Request.docx

Request

The homework requirement is to take Fieschertal as the research object, and propose a constructive tourism plan for it. The direction of my plan and the feedback of the submitted homework are as follows. Please help me complete the homework based on these

Remarks, please do not use copy content from previous assignments and do not use gpt

The word count requirement is 2500 words, the framework of the homework is basically the same as the previous homework, and combined with the feedback from the previous homework

Direction:

Increasing competition in tourism and the necessity to find a proper niche + B2B in Fieschertal: the tours for companies and businesses

Additional marks: the fierce competition in Switzerland among multiple destinations; first tier cities, second tier destination + others… How to stimulate underdeveloped areas

Content

The introduction is missing, still would be useful to understand the aim of the study.

In-text references are required. The reference list is not sufficient regarding the type of the assessment (only 7 sources). The critical approach should be significantly strengthened. 

The reflection is missing.

The SWOT analysis is presented but could be supported with statistics, references, more details. The suggestions are clearly expressed but have a generalised approach to the problem and don't shed the light on the business idea more in-depth.

The suggestions to develop the destination are too generic and are not related to the competitive forces in the region as well as to a more thorough customer description (both were not reflected in the paper).

The conclusion contains even more information related to marketing strategies than the essay itself.

 

Has failed to achieve intended learning outcomes in several critical respects. Inadequate subject knowledge; conceptual gaps; minimal of relevant issues and theory; limited use of appropriate techniques; work lacks sound development; a poor critical analysis and evaluation; no evidence of originality; inadequately researched; quality of relevant generic skills does not meet the requirements of the task.