Discussion: Searching Databases
DATELINE: FRIDAY 3/26/2021
Instructions: Respond to your colleague and provide further suggestions on how their database search might be improved.
** AT LEAST 2 REFERENCES**
Donique McClinton
Background
CLABSI prevention within the neonatal population is my clinical issue of interest I have chosen and will base on developing my PICOT question. CLABSI, a central line-associated bloodstream infection, should be considered a severe, medical-induced complication (Stroever, et al., 2020) that can be prevented with proper education and management. Within my six years of my registered nurse licensure, I have encountered CLABSIs in the neonatal intensive care unit very frequently.
Search Terms and Databases Utilized for Search
Attempting to research my topic of interest in the Walden University Library (n.d.a.), using the terms “CLABSI prevention in the NICU”, nine articles resulted. Although out of the nine, each article seems to be fitting for my clinical issue of interest. With my occupation history, I know there is many more articles base on my clinical issue of interest.
Search Results, Articles Returned, and Changes from use of Boolean Operators
According to Walden University Library (n.d.b.), commanding a database to search for multiple terms or concepts at the same time, narrowing down my search, and possibly entail looking for alternative terms that yield more results reveal from utilizing Boolean operators. After altering the search with Boolean terminology, I attempted an advanced search for “CLABSI” and “infant or baby or newborn or neonate,” which resulted in 349 articles. Slightly altering my Boolean advanced my resulted article significantly, therefore benefiting my research.
Database Strategies to Increase Rigor and Effectiveness
There are several plans I could make to increase the consistency and effectiveness when searching databases to answer my PICOT question. I have already completed the first step of, according to Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2018), convey the clinical issue into a searchable, answerable question; in the NICU, how does the anti-septic technique compare with the occurrence of CLABSI affect the patient’s outcome will admitted. This type of question would be considered a focused, foreground question.
Another plan I could use to increase the consistency and effectiveness is utilizing my “available support and multiple databases or sources, and well-practiced techniques to ensure that reliable evidence is found” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018, p. 87). This technique will gather information from different viewpoints to complete my researched information. Since I have worked at several NICU, I could utilize the policy and procedure handbook of the other units to compare the anti-septic techniques.
PICOT Question
Noted within the above foreground question are the population, interest, compassion needs, and outcome; all to compose a PICOT question. In the NICU (P), how does the anti-septic technique (I) compared with the occurrence of CLABSI (C) affect the patient’s outcome (O) will admitted (T).
References
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice(4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Stroever, S., Boston, K., Ellsworth, M., Cuccaro, P., & McCurdy, S. (2020). Qualitative process evaluation of a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention team in the neonatal intensive care unit. American Journal of Infection Control, 48(9), 987–992. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.12.020
Walden University Library. (n.d.a.) Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.b.) Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean
Bottom of Form
DATELINE:
FRIDAY
3/26/2021
Instructions:
Respon
d
to
your
colleague and
provide further suggestions on how their database search might be
improved
.
**
AT
LEAST
2
REFERENCES
**
Donique
McClint
on
Background
CLABSI
prevention
within
the
neonatal
population
is
my
clinical
issue
of
interest
I
have
chosen
and
will
base
on
developing
my
PICOT
question.
CLABSI,
a
central
line
-
associated
bloodstream
infect
ion,
should
be
considered
a
severe,
medical
-
induced
complication
(Stroever,
et
al.,
2020)
that
can
be
prevented
with
proper
education
and
management.
Within
my
six
years
of
my
registered
nurse
licensure,
I
have
encountered
CLABSIs
in
the
neonatal
intensive
care
unit
very
frequently.
Search
Terms
and
Databases
Utilized
for
Search
Attempting
to
research
my
topic
of
interest
in
the
Walden
University
Library
(n.d.a.),
using
the
terms
“CLABSI
prevention
in
the
NICU”,
nine
articles
resulted.
Although
ou
t
of
the
nine,
each
article
seems
to
be
fitting
for
my
clinical
issue
of
interest.
With
my
occupation
history,
I
know
there
is
many
more
articles
base
on
my
clinical
issue
of
interest.
Search
Results,
Articles
Returned,
and
Changes
from
use
of
Boolean
Ope
rators
According
to
Walden
University
Library
(n.d.b.),
commanding
a
database
to
search
for
multiple
terms
or
concepts
at
the
same
time,
narrowing
down
my
search,
and
possibly
entail
looking
for
alternative
terms
that
yield
more
results
r
eveal
from
utilizing
Boolean
operators.
After
altering
the
search
with
Boolean
terminology,
I
attempted
an
advanced
search
for
“CLABSI”
and
“infant
or
baby
or
newborn
or
neonate,”
which
resulted
in
349
articles.
Slightly
altering
my
Boolean
advanced
my
res
ulted
article
significantly,
therefore
benefiting
my
research.
Database
Strategies
to
Increase
Rigor
and
Effectiveness
There
are
several
plans
I
could
make
to
increase
the
consistency
and
effectiveness
when
searching
databases
to
answer
my
PICOT
question.
I
have
already
completed
the
first
step
of,
according
to
Melnyk
&
Fineout
-
Overholt
(2018),
convey
the
clinical
issue
into
a
searchable,
answerable
question;
in
the
NICU,
how
does
the
anti
-
septic
technique
compare
with
the
occurrence
of
CLABSI
aff
ect
the
patient’s
outcome
will
admitted.
This
type
of
question
would
be
considered
a
focused,
foreground
question.
Another
plan
I
could
use
to
increase
the
consistency
and
effectiveness
is
utilizing
my
“available
support
and
multiple
databases
or
sources,
and
well
-
practiced
techniques
to
ensure
that
reliable
evidence
is
found”
(Melnyk
&
Fineout
-
Overholt,
2018,
p.
87).
This
technique
will
gather
information
from
different
viewpoints
to
complete
my
researched
information.
Since
I
have
worked
at
seve
ral
NICU,
I
could
utilize
the
policy
and
procedure
handbook
of
the
other
units
to
compare
the
anti
-
septic
techniques.
PICOT
Question
Noted
within
the
above
foreground
question
are
the
population,
interest,
compassion
needs,
and
outcome;
a
ll
to
compose
a
PICOT
question.
In
the
NICU
(P),
how
does
the
anti
-
septic
technique
(I)
compared
with
the
occurrence
of
CLABSI
(C)
affect
the
patient’s
outcome
(O)
will
admitted
(T).
References
Melnyk,
B.
M.,
&
Fineout
-
Overholt,
E.
(2018).
Evidence
-
based
practice
in
nursing
&
healthcare:
A
guide
to
best
practice(4
th
ed.).
Philadelphia,
PA:
Wolters
Kluwer.
Stroever,
S.,
Boston,
K.,
Ellsworth,
M.,
Cuccaro,
P.,
&
McCurdy,
S.
(2020).
Qualitative
process
evaluation
of
a
central
line
-
associated
bloodstream
infection
(CLABSI)
prevention
team
in
the
neonatal
intensive
care
unit.
American
Journal
of
Infection
Control,
48(9),
987
–
992.
https://doi
-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.12.020
Walden
University
Library.
(n.d.a.)
Databases
A
-
Z:
Nursing.
Retrieved
from
http
s://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden
University
Library.
(n.d.b.)
Keyword
searching:
Finding
articles
on
your
topic:
Boolean
terms.
Retrieved
from
https://academicgu
ides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean
DATELINE: FRIDAY 3/26/2021
Instructions: Respond to your colleague and provide further suggestions on how their database search might be
improved.
** AT LEAST 2 REFERENCES**
Donique McClinton
Background
CLABSI prevention within the neonatal population is my clinical issue of interest I have chosen and will base on
developing my PICOT question. CLABSI, a central line-associated bloodstream infection, should be considered a severe,
medical-induced complication (Stroever, et al., 2020) that can be prevented with proper education and management. Within
my six years of my registered nurse licensure, I have encountered CLABSIs in the neonatal intensive care unit very frequently.
Search Terms and Databases Utilized for Search
Attempting to research my topic of interest in the Walden University Library (n.d.a.), using the terms “CLABSI prevention
in the NICU”, nine articles resulted. Although out of the nine, each article seems to be fitting for my clinical issue of interest.
With my occupation history, I know there is many more articles base on my clinical issue of interest.
Search Results, Articles Returned, and Changes from use of Boolean Operators
According to Walden University Library (n.d.b.), commanding a database to search for multiple terms or concepts at the
same time, narrowing down my search, and possibly entail looking for alternative terms that yield more results reveal from
utilizing Boolean operators. After altering the search with Boolean terminology, I attempted an advanced search for “CLABSI”
and “infant or baby or newborn or neonate,” which resulted in 349 articles. Slightly altering my Boolean advanced my resulted
article significantly, therefore benefiting my research.
Database Strategies to Increase Rigor and Effectiveness
There are several plans I could make to increase the consistency and effectiveness when searching databases to answer
my PICOT question. I have already completed the first step of, according to Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2018), convey the
clinical issue into a searchable, answerable question; in the NICU, how does the anti-septic technique compare with the
occurrence of CLABSI affect the patient’s outcome will admitted. This type of question would be considered a focused,
foreground question.
Another plan I could use to increase the consistency and effectiveness is utilizing my “available support and multiple
databases or sources, and well-practiced techniques to ensure that reliable evidence is found” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt,
2018, p. 87). This technique will gather information from different viewpoints to complete my researched information. Since I
have worked at several NICU, I could utilize the policy and procedure handbook of the other units to compare the anti-septic
techniques.
PICOT Question
Noted within the above foreground question are the population, interest, compassion needs, and outcome; all to compose
a PICOT question. In the NICU (P), how does the anti-septic technique (I) compared with the occurrence of CLABSI (C) affect
the patient’s outcome (O) will admitted (T).
References
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice(4
th
ed.).
Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Stroever, S., Boston, K., Ellsworth, M., Cuccaro, P., & McCurdy, S. (2020). Qualitative process evaluation of a central line-
associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention team in the neonatal intensive care unit. American Journal of Infection
Control, 48(9), 987–992. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.12.020
Walden University Library. (n.d.a.) Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved
from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.b.) Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Retrieved
from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean