8210 WK 8 ASSGN

Candyy31
RegressionCoefficients.html
Magnifying glassSkill Builder 16: Interpreting Correlation and Regression CoefficientsSKIP TO TOPIC0% COMPLETE 0% COMPLETE Magnifying glassSkill Builder 16: Interpreting Correlation and Regression CoefficientsSKIP TO TOPIC0% COMPLETE 0% COMPLETE 0% COMPLETE 0% COMPLETE
Three vertical lines aligned to the leftCorrelation CoefficientsCorrelation Coefficients 0 Percent Complete A circle with a colored border representing one's progress through a lesson. Three vertical lines aligned to the leftRegression CoefficientsRegression Coefficients 7 Percent Complete A circle with a colored border representing one's progress through a lesson. Three vertical lines aligned to the leftModule Summary and QuizModule Summary and Quiz 0 Percent Complete A circle with a colored border representing one's progress through a lesson. Three vertical lines aligned to the leftGlossaryGlossary 0 Percent Complete A circle with a colored border representing one's progress through a lesson. EXIT SKILL BUILDERTopic 1 - Correlation Coefficients EXIT SKILL BUILDER

Regression Coefficients

Topic 2 of 4
Learning Objective:Interpret correlation and regression coefficients.

Learning Objective: Interpret correlation and regression coefficients.

Regression Models

In addition to Pearson’s correlation analysis, linear regression is another way to examine the association between two variables. Regression models are quite flexible and, unlike with a single Pearson’s correlation analysis, the researcher can include multiple predictor variables that they wish to associate with the dependent variable in the same regression model. Regression models can also incorporate both categorical and continuous predictors. For the sake of this Skill Builder, however, we will focus on models that have just one (1) single predictor variable (bivariate regression models), and we will focus on cases in which both variables (the predictor and the outcome) are continuous.

Let’s return to our example of the association between students’ and peers’ value for English. We can run a regression model that is comparable to the Pearson’s correlation analysis that we did previously. Take a look below at the regression results from SPSS.

Regression Results

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .438a .191 .178 1.35361

a. Predictors: (Constant), peer group's English value.

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 26.466 1 26.466 14.445 .000b
Residual 111.768 61 1.832 blank blank
Total 138.234 62 blank blank blank

a. Dependent Variable: English value. b. Predictors: (Constant), peer group's English value.

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. 95% Confidence Interval for B
B Std. Error Beta Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 (Constant) 1.667 .769 blank 2.168 .034 .129 3.204
peer group's English value .654 .172 .438 3.801 .000 .310 .998
Legend for Coefficientsa
Unstandardized regression coefficient
Standardized regression coefficient
p-value for the association between students' and peers' English value
The Standardized Regression Coefficient +

Of interest in the output is the standardized regression coefficient for the peer group’s English value and the unstandardized regression coefficient. If you take a look first at the standardized regression coefficient, it should look familiar to you. The value of β = .438 is the same value that we obtained previously for Pearson’s correlation coefficient! That is, of course, not a coincidence. When you have just one (1) predictor in your regression model, the standardized regression coefficient will be the same as the coefficient you would get if you ran a Pearson’s correlation analysis. You can, therefore, interpret standardized regression coefficients in the same way as you would interpret a Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Unstandardized Regression Coefficient +

Let’s focus now on the unstandardized regression coefficient (B = .654) and think about how to interpret it. Just like when we previously discussed correlation, the unstandardized regression coefficient will have a direction and be either positive or negative:

  • Positive: As one variable increases, the other variable increases.
  • Negative: As one variable increases, the other variable decreases.
The Strength of the Effect +

In addition to understanding the direction of the effect, we will also, just like with correlation, want to understand the strength of the effect. We can use the standardized regression coefficient to gauge the strength (the strength of the coefficient), using the general rule previously noted for correlation. We can also, however, interpret the strength of the effect by examining the unstandardized regression coefficient. The unstandardized coefficient can be interpreted to indicate that for every one (1) unit increase in the predictor variable, the outcome variable will increase by the amount of the unstandardized coefficient. So, in the output above, we can see that for every one (1) unit increase in peers’ English value, students’ English value increases by .654 units. Recall that English value is measured on a scale of 1 to 7.

CONTINUE TO ACTIVITY