History of The Middle East
Reflection Paper Rubric
|
|
|
|
Course Content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional 4 90-100% |
Good 3 80-89% |
Fair/Adequate 2 70-79% |
Limited 1 60-69% |
Poor/Unacceptable 0 0-59% |
Points Available |
Points Awarded |
|
Attention to instructions and assignment |
Follows and exceeds expectations noted in instructions |
Follows instructions |
Follows some but not all instructions |
Gestures towards instructions but demonstrates little comprehension or competency |
Disregards instructions |
10 |
|
|
Creative Thought/ Problem-Solving
|
Demonstrates a high degree of originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
Shows some originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
Shows minimally acceptable originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
Demonstrates very little creative thought or insight; consists mostly of second-hand ideas |
Shows no original thought; all second-hand ideas |
20 |
|
|
Thesis statement
|
Thesis statement is specific, significant, arguable, and easy to find. |
Thesis statement arguable and easy to find. |
Thesis statement minimally acceptable but somewhat general or obvious |
Thesis statement simplistic or incomprehensible |
No thesis statement. |
5 |
|
|
Development and Support |
Thoroughly and insightfully explores, explains, and supports each idea |
Develops and supports key points |
Inconsistently develops and supports ideas |
Inadequately or ineffectively explains and defends ideas |
Does not make a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity
|
Difficult material is made clear and presented in academic language |
Most ideas are presented clearly, but sometimes too simplistically |
Wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully |
Unclear and difficult to understand |
Largely incomprehensible |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Writing Skills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional 4 90-100% |
Good 3 80-89% |
Fair/Adequate 2 70-79% |
Limited 1 60-69% |
Poor/Unacceptable 0 0-59% |
Points Available |
Points Awarded |
|
Structure/Organization
|
Well organized from introduction to conclusion; paragraphs and ideas flow coherently |
Easy to follow, but would benefit from some restructuring and/or stronger transitions between ideas |
Readable, but order of ideas and/or transitions between ideas need work |
Paper is difficult to follow |
Ideas are presented randomly with no clear logic governing their order or transitions between them |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal/professional language |
Highly articulate academic tone |
Clear and appropriate language |
Acceptable language use overall, but some informal language |
Some acceptable language use, but overall tone is informal |
Lack of respect shown to subject through use of slang and/or overly casual or colloquial language |
10 |
|
|
Grammar (sentence structure, subject/verb agreement, pronoun/antecedent agreement, etc.) |
No grammatical errors |
Occasional errors in grammar (one or two per page) |
Several minor errors per page |
Grammatical errors make it necessary to reread sentences and/or sections to discern meaning |
Coherence of overall meaning unclear due to grammar |
10 |
|
|
Punctuation, capitalization, & spelling/word choice
|
Punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are all correct. |
No more than one error of this type per page |
Approx. two or three errors of this type per page |
Approx. four or five errors of this type per page |
Paper requires extensive editing/proofreading in this area |
10 |
|
Total points earned/grade: