Reference List
Reference List Grading Checklist
Performance Level Ratings
|
Meets Expectations
|
Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of project construction and/or recording, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met. |
|
Near Expectations
|
Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of project construction and/or recording, one or more of the most critical goals were not met. |
|
Below Expectations
|
Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of project construction and/or recording, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas. |
|
Assignment Criteria |
Below Expectations
|
Near Expectations
|
Meets Expectations
|
Earned |
|
Title page, APA formatted. |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
Description is succinct and clearly explains the topic. |
0 pts – 3 pts |
12 pts – 19 pts |
20 pts |
|
|
Research question is well worded and appropriate for the topic description. |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
At least 10 references are listed, all less than 5 years old. |
0 pts – 17 pts |
18 pts – 29 pts |
30 pts |
|
|
All references include the permalink or persistent link. |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
References are from appropriate sources including at least 1 book and 5 journals. |
0 pts – 6 pts |
7 pts – 9 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
There are virtually no errors in APA documentation format or citations; all sources are authoritative. |
0 pts – 1 pts |
2 pts – 4 pts |
10 pts |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
/100 |
|
Instructor Feedback
|
|