one page post

Nicky
Reading1.docx

Requirement: we're reading several examples of "dramatic" poetry, which our "Versification" chapter defines as "poetry, monologue or dialogue, written in the voice of a character assumed by the poet" (2027). Robert Browning's "My Last Duchess " (1842) is a famous example of a dramatic monologue: in this poem, the speaker (likely the Duke of Ferrara) addresses an unnamed person, who is likely an envoy (or representative) of the family of the Duke's prospective new wife.

Read Browning's poem carefully, and then read Richard Howard's "Nikolaus Mardruz to his Master " (1929), which Howard writes from the point of view of the unnamed speaker in Browning's famous poem. For some context, it may help to know that, in Howard's poem, the speaker -- named by Howard as "the Envoy of My Lord the Count of Tyrol" -- is writing a letter to his patron, the Count of Tyrol, father of the prospective bride; the letter is the envoy's report on his visit to the town of Ferrara and his conversation with the Duke. Here is the question for your Reading Post: What does Howard's response to Browning reveal to you about the original poem by Browning that you might otherwise not have noticed?

My Last Duchess 

BY  ROBERT BROWNING

FERRARA

That’s my last Duchess painted on the wall, 

Looking as if she were alive. I call 

That piece a wonder, now; Fra Pandolf’s hands 

Worked busily a day, and there she stands. 

Will’t please you sit and look at her? I said 

“Fra Pandolf” by design, for never read 

Strangers like you that pictured countenance, 

The depth and passion of its earnest glance, 

But to myself they turned (since none puts by 

The curtain I have drawn for you, but I) 

And seemed as they would ask me, if they durst, 

How such a glance came there; so, not the first 

Are you to turn and ask thus. Sir, ’twas not 

Her husband’s presence only, called that spot 

Of joy into the Duchess’ cheek; perhaps 

Fra Pandolf chanced to say, “Her mantle laps 

Over my lady’s wrist too much,” or “Paint 

Must never hope to reproduce the faint 

Half-flush that dies along her throat.” Such stuff 

Was courtesy, she thought, and cause enough 

For calling up that spot of joy. She had 

A heart—how shall I say?— too soon made glad, 

Too easily impressed; she liked whate’er 

She looked on, and her looks went everywhere. 

Sir, ’twas all one! My favour at her breast, 

The dropping of the daylight in the West, 

The bough of cherries some officious fool 

Broke in the orchard for her, the white mule 

She rode with round the terrace—all and each 

Would draw from her alike the approving speech, 

Or blush, at least. She thanked men—good! but thanked 

Somehow—I know not how—as if she ranked 

My gift of a nine-hundred-years-old name 

With anybody’s gift. Who’d stoop to blame 

This sort of trifling? Even had you skill 

In speech—which I have not—to make your will 

Quite clear to such an one, and say, “Just this 

Or that in you disgusts me; here you miss, 

Or there exceed the mark”—and if she let 

Herself be lessoned so, nor plainly set 

Her wits to yours, forsooth, and made excuse— 

E’en then would be some stooping; and I choose 

Never to stoop. Oh, sir, she smiled, no doubt, 

Whene’er I passed her; but who passed without 

Much the same smile? This grew; I gave commands; 

Then all smiles stopped together. There she stands 

As if alive. Will’t please you rise? We’ll meet 

The company below, then. I repeat, 

The Count your master’s known munificence 

Is ample warrant that no just pretense 

Of mine for dowry will be disallowed; 

Though his fair daughter’s self, as I avowed 

At starting, is my object. Nay, we’ll go 

Together down, sir. Notice Neptune, though, 

Taming a sea-horse, thought a rarity, 

Which Claus of Innsbruck cast in bronze for me!

Nikolaus Mardruz to his Master Ferdinand, Count of Tyrol, 1565

Richard Howard, 1929

A tribute to Robert Browning and in

celebration of the 65th birthday of Harold

Bloom, who made such tribute only natural.

My Lord recalls Ferrara? How walls

rise out of water yet appear to recede

identically

into it, as if

built in both directions: soaring and sinking...

Such mirroring was my first dismay--

my next, having crossed

the moat, was making

out that, for all its grandeur, the great

pile, observed close to, is close to a ruin!

(Even My Lord’s most

unstinting dowry

may not restore this wasted precincts to what

their deteriorating state demands.)

Queasy it made me,

glancing first down there

at swans in the moat apparently

feeding on their own doubled image, then up

at the citadel,

so high--or so deep,

and everywhere those carved effigies of

men and women, monsters among them

crowding the ramparts

and seeming at home

in the dingy water that somehow

held them up as if for our surveillance--ours?

anyone’s who looked!

All that pretension

of marble display, the whole improbable

menagerie with but one purpose:

having to be seen.

Such was the matter

of Ferrara, and such the manner,

when at last we met, of the Duke in greeting

My Lordship’s Envoy:

life in fallen stone!

Several hours were to elapse, in the keeping

of his lackeys, before the Envoy

of My Lord the Count

of Tyrol might see

or even be seen to by His Grace

the Duke of Ferrara, though from such neglect

no deliberate

slight need be inferred:

now that I have had an opportunity

--have had, indeed, the obligation--

to fix on His Grace

that perlustration

or power of scrutiny for which

(I believe) My Lord holds his Envoy’s service

in some favor still,

I see that the Duke,

by his own lights or perhaps, more properly

said, by his own tenebrosity,

could offer some excuse

for such cunctation...

Appraising a set of cameos

just brought from Cairo by a Jew in his trust,

His Grace had been rapt

in connoisseurship,

that study which alone can distract him

from his wonted courtesy; he was

affability

itself, once his mind

could be deflected from mere objects.

At last I presented (with those documents

which in some detail

describe and define

the duties of both signators) the portrait

of your daughter the Countess,

observing the while

his countenance. No

fault was found with our contract, of which

each article had been so correctly framed

(if I may say so)

as to ascertain

a pre-nuptial alliance which must persuade

and please the most punctilious (and

impecunious)

of future husbands.

Principally, or (if I may be

allowed the amendment) perhaps Ducally,

His Grace acknowledged

himself beguiled by

Cranach’s portrait of our young Countess, praising

the design, the hues, the glaze--the frame

and appeared averse,

for a while, even

to letting the panel leave his hands!

Examining those same hands, I was convinced

that no matter what

the result of our

(at this point, promising) negotiations,

your daughter’s likeness must now remain

“for good," as we say,

among Ferrara’s

treasures, already one more trophy

in His Grace’s multifarious holdings,

like those marble busts

lining the drawbridge,

like those weed-stained statues grinning up at us

from the still moat, and--inside as well

as out--those grotesque

figures and faces

fastened to the walls. So be it!

Real

bother (after all, one painting, for Cranach

--and My Lord--need be

no great forfeiture)

commenced only when the Duke himself led me

out of the audience-chamber and

laboriously

(he is no longer

a young man) to a secret penthouse

high on the battlements where he can indulge

those despotic tastes

he denominates,

half smiling over the heartless words,

“the relative consolations of semblance.”

“Sir, suppose you draw

that curtain," smiling

in earnest now, and so I sought--

but what appeared a piece of drapery proved

a painted deceit!

My embarrassment

afforded a cue for audible laughter,

and only then His Grace, visibly

relishing his trick,

turned the thing around,

whereupon appeared, on the reverse,

the late Duchess of Ferrara to the life!

Instanter the Duke

praised the portrait

so readily provided by one Pandolf--

a monk by some profane article

attached to the court,

hence answerable

for taking likenesses as required

in but a day’s diligence, so it was claimed...

Myself I find it

but a mountebank’s

proficiency--another chicane, like that

illusive curtain, a waxwork sort

of nature called forth:

cold legerdemain!

Though extranea such as the hares

(copulating!), the doves, and a full-blown rose

were showily limned,

I could not discern

aught to be loved in that countenance itself,

likely to rival, much less to excel

the life illumined

in Cranach’s image

of our Countess, which His Grace had set

beside the dead woman’s presentment... And took,

so evident was

the supremacy,

no further pains to assert Fra Pandolf’s skill.

One last hard look, whereupon the Duke

resumed his discourse

in an altered tone,

now some unintelligible rant

of stooping--His Grace chooses “never to stoop”

when he makes reproof...

My Lord will take this

as but a figure: not only is the Duke

no longer young, his body is so

queerly misshapen

that even to speak

of “not stooping” seems absurdity:

the creature is stooped, whether by cruel

or impartial cause--say

Time or the Tempter--

I shall not venture to hypothecate. Cause

or no cause, it would appear he marked

some motive for his

“reproof," a mortal

chastisement in fact inflicted on

his poor Duchess, put away (I take it so)

for smiling--at whom?

Brother Pandolf? or

some visitor to court during the sitting?

--too generally, if I construe

the Duke’s clue rightly,

to survive the terms

of his... severe protocol. My Lord,

at the time it was delivered to me thus,

the admonition

if indeed it was

any such thing, seemed no more of a menace

than the rest of his rodomontade;

item, he pointed,

as we toiled downstairs,

to that bronze Neptune by our old Claus

(there must be at least six of them cluttering

the Summer Palace

at Innsbruck), claiming

it was “cast in bronze for me.” Nonsense, of course.

But upon reflection, I suppose

we had better take

the old reprobate

at his unspeakable word... Why, even

assuming his boasts should be as plausible

as his avarice,

no “cause” for dismay:

once ensconced here as the Duchess, your daughter

need no more apprehend the Duke’s

murderous temper

than his matchless taste.

For I have devised a means whereby

the dowry so flagrantly pursued by our

insolvent Duke (“no

just pretense of mine

be disallowed” indeed!), instead of being

paid as he pleads in one globose sum,

should drip into his

coffers by degrees--

say, one fifth each year--then after five

such years, the dowry itself to be doubled,

always assuming

that Her Grace enjoys

her usual smiling health. The years are her

ally in such an arbitrament,

and with confidence

My Lord can assure

the new Duchess (assuming her Duke

abides by these stipulations and his own

propensity for

accumulating

“semblances”) the long devotion (so long as

he lasts ) of her last Duke... Or more likely,

if I guess aright

your daughter’s intent,

of that young lordling I might make so

bold as to designate her next Duke, as well...

Ever determined in

My Lordship’s service,

I remain his Envoy

to Ferrara as to the world.

Nikolaus Mardruz.

1994