RC03
|
Please review my feedback in the rubric and then resubmit. I have opened the second attempt for you. |
|
|
Rubric Name: RC003 Rubric v.2
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
0 - Not Present
1 -Needs Improvement
2 - Meets Expectations
3 - Exceeds Expectations
Learning Objective 1.1: Summarize research findings in the early childhood field.
Summary of three peer-reviewed journal articles is not present.
Response includes a vague summary of three peer-reviewed journal articles related to one of the topics presented in the Assessment.
Or, response does not include an APA citation for each article or the citation is inaccurate.
Response includes an accurate and thorough summary of three peer-reviewed journal articles related to one of the topics presented in the Assessment.
Response includes an accurate APA citation for each article.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response includes an accurate and thorough summary of two additional (total of five) peer-reviewed journal articles related to one of the topics presented in the Assessment.
Learning Objective 1.2: Apply strategies to evaluate scholarly publications.
Application of appropriate strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of three peer-reviewed journal articles is not present.
Response demonstrates a superficial or incomplete application of appropriate strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of three peer-reviewed journal articles.
Response demonstrates an application of appropriate strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of three peer-reviewed journal articles.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response weighs the merits and limitations of using specific strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of three peer-reviewed journal articles.
Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize findings from Internet sources related to topics in the early childhood field.
Summary of two Internet sources related to one of the topics presented in the Assessment is not present.
Response includes a vague summary of two Internet sources related to one of the topics presented in the Assessment.
Or, response does not include an APA citation for each Internet source, or the citation is inaccurate.
Response includes an accurate and thorough summary of two Internet sources related to one of the topics presented in the Assessment.
Response includes an accurate APA citation for each Internet source.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response includes an accurate and thorough summary of two additional (total of four) Internet sources related to one of the topics presented in the Assessment.
Criterion Feedback
You need to use 2 difference sources, specific to the Internet, different from what you already used in the previous section.
Learning Objective 2.2: Apply strategies to evaluate Internet sources.
Application of appropriate strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of Internet sources is not present.
Response demonstrates a superficial or incomplete application of appropriate strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of Internet sources.
Response demonstrates an application of appropriate strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of Internet sources.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response weighs the merits and limitations of using specific strategies for evaluating the validity and credibility of Internet sources.
Criterion Feedback
See above comment.
Learning Objective 3.1: Describe ethical guidelines for conducting early childhood research studies.
Description of the ethical guidelines for conducting early childhood research studies is not present.
Response provides a vague or superficial description of the ethical guidelines for conducting early childhood research studies.
Response clearly describes the ethical guidelines for conducting early childhood research studies.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response provides a rationale for strict adherence of the SRCD Ethical Standards for Research with Children.
Learning Objective 3.2: Analyze research studies for adherence to ethical guidelines for conducting early childhood research studies.
Analysis of whether the study adheres to ethical guidelines is not present.
Response provides a superficial or unclear explanation.
Response thoroughly explains how the methodology in the chosen article adheres to ethical guidelines for conducting early childhood research studies.
Rationale is supported by logical connections to SRCD Ethical Standards for Research with Children.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response provides cited examples from the research study to demonstrate adherence to specific principles from SRCD Ethical Standards for Research with Children.
Learning Objective 4.1: Synthesize various sources of information related to a research topic in the early childhood field.
Synthesis is not present.
Response provides an incomplete or illogical synthesis of the sources used in the Assessment.
Response provides a logical synthesis of all five sources used in the Assessment.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response explains the implications from the research on professional practice.
Criterion Feedback
Need to synthesize the 5 articles chosen in first sections (3 research articles, 2 internet articles)
Learning Objective 4.2: Explain the importance of credibility, validity, ethics, relevance, and accuracy in early childhood research.
Explanation of is not present.
Response provides an unclear or vague explanation.
Response clearly explains the importance of credibility, validity, ethics, relevance, and accuracy in early childhood research.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response explains the implications from the research on professional practice.
Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.
Multiple major and minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are highly distracting and seriously impact readability.
Multiple minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are distracting and negatively impact readability.
Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
Grammar, spelling, and mechanics reflect a high level of accuracy in standard American English and enhance readability.
Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.
Writing is poorly organized and incoherent. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are missing or inappropriate.
Writing is loosely organized. Limited use of introductions, transitions, and conclusions provides partial continuity.
Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.
Writing is consistently well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance clarity, cohesion, and flow.
Written Communication PS 1.4: Apply APA style to written work.
APA conventions are not applied.
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied inconsistently.
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited appropriately and accurately.
Information Literacy PS 6.1: Identify credible sources.
Credible sources are missing.
Some sources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic.
Most sources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic.
All resources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic.
Information Literacy PS 6.2: Analyze findings from relevant sources.
Analysis is missing.
Analysis superficially reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose.
Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose.
Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose, and synthesizes findings to generate new insights.
Overall Score
Overall Score
0 - Not Present
1 - Needs Improvement
2 - Meets Expectations
3 - Exceeds Expectations
|
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
Not Yet Achieved |
|
|
Feedback Date |
|
|
Jun 11, 2020 8:58 PM |
|
Assignment |
|
|
RC003 Assessment Submission (Attempt 1)
|