Reserch paper about the advantages of digital dental radiography

Component	Criteria	Comments	Maximum Points	Points Earned
Saving document (Used Word, the correct file naming procedure of document, and followed directions for submission to the turnitin)	1= Used Word, correct file name, and followed directions for assignment and submission to turnitin. .5 deduction for each of the following:           Using program other than Word           Incorrect/incomplete file name (not using last name)           Not following directions for assignment/ submission to turnitin		10
Title Page (Title of assignment, student name, date, institution, course name—in APA format)	1= Correct title page format with name, date, institution, course name, and title of assignment 0= no title page included .5 deduction for each of the following:           No manuscript header (short title and page number)           Title not in Upper and Lower Case           Title information not in 12 pt font, not double spaced, and or not centered in middle of page           Title not repeated at top center of page 2		10
Mechanics of Writing (Followed rules of written English language, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Used APA format where appropriate, resources cited when references are used)	2= Excellent use of written English including sentence structure, grammar, punctuation and spelling with no errors, along with proper APA editorial format. Deductions in increments of .25 for any of the following:           Improper sentence structure,           grammar,           punctuation, and or           spelling errors           Use of non-professional terms APA format errors: Deduct 1 point for not citing within text Deductions in increments of .5 for any of the following: · Improper/incorrect citations, · reference page not according to APA format		20
Content (Followed directions of assignment with relevant content and material.  Used current information, showed organization and clarity in written message)	6= Exceptional 5= Excellent 4= Good 3= Weak 2= Poor 1= Unacceptable 0= Did not follow directions, or plagiarized Note: see detailed explanation of each of these criteria in the descriptions below the rubric		60
Total Points (Timely submission)			100

Content:

6=Exceptional: This is the highest rating. Content demonstrates exceptional knowledge and in-depth understanding of relevant and important ideas directly related to the topic. Construction of content is fully developed, and includes specific and accurate examples or facts. Paper is logically and clearly organized around major concepts or principles in the field. Content is exemplary, with detail and clarity of the written word. Exceptionally followed the directions of the assignment.

5= Excellent: Content demonstrates above average knowledge and understanding of relevant and important ideas related to this topic. Construction is nearly fully developed, and includes specific and accurate examples or facts. Paper is generally logical and organized around major concepts or principles in the field. Content is excellent, with detail and clarity of the written word. Carefully followed the directions of the assignment.

4= Good: Content demonstrates adequate knowledge and understanding of relevant and important ideas directly related to this topic. Construction is adequately developed, but may lack some specific examples and or contain some inaccuracies. Paper has some logical lapses, and is somewhat organized around major concepts or principles in the field. Content is good, but lacks some detail and clarity of the written word. Some lapses in following the directions of the assignment.

3= Weak: Content demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding of relevant and important ideas directly related to this topic. Construction is inadequately developed, and lacks specific examples and or contains inaccuracies. Paper has logical lapses and is not organized around major concepts and principles in the field. Content is weak and lacks detail and clarity of the written word. Many lapses in following the directions of the assignment.

2= Poor: Content demonstrates poor knowledge and understanding of relevant and important ideas directly related to this topic. Construction is poorly developed, and lacks specific examples and or contains numerous inaccuracies. Paper has numerous logical lapses and in poorly organized around major concepts and principles in the field. Content is poor and lacks detail with no clarity of the written word. Major lack of following directions for assignment.

1= Unacceptable: Paper is so lacking in content, organization and construction that it is deemed unacceptable for baccalaureate level of writing.

0= Did not follow any of the directions for the assignment; paper contains intentional plagiarism

Turnitin.com point deductions: 0-5% plagiarized: 0 points deducted from final score

6-10% plagiarized 1 points deducted from final score

11-15% plagiarized 2 points deducted from final score

16-29% plagiarized 3 points deducted from final score

21-25% plagiarized 4 points deducted from final score

≥ 25% plagiarized 5 points deducted from final score