Essay. (Research and writing Sciences)

Question:

Is there an Uncertainty principle that applies to the interaction between individuals?

As human beings, we coexist with each other through interaction, either to solve predetermined issues at times; some interactions are just random and unplanned. Interaction between an individual in day to day lives are well explained by a principle of Heisenberg Principe of uncertainty. However, this principle of uncertainty is more of technical fields in life rather than hum relations with each other. The knowledge from this knowledge is what is referred to value at the uncertainties that underline interaction between individuals. The basic argument of this principle is that you cannot tell the speed of an electron and its position at the same time. At least one of this event is uncertain when the other is known. This principle argues that one can only approximate booth speed and position of an electron, but t is impossible to get these facts right at any given point. So is the case with human relations, in most cases, one cannot be certain on what will exactly happen when they interact with others. Here, one can only determine the most probable results but not what will actually happen when one is interacting with others.

The practical application of this principle is that in our daily interaction among each other, we seem to attach current interaction with previous ones. This is in try to achieve desired results from known past consequences, although in most cases it in uncertain whether our try to modify interaction with each other will bear desired and predetermined results. This principle of uncertainty in exemplified in the play, Copenhagen. In this play, the interaction was between two individuals, Werner Heisenberg and Niels Bohr. Their past relations were based on friends. This play has identified them as friends but to exemplify the Heisenberg principle of uncertainty, the playing subject these two friends into a special kind of interaction with each other.

The play is based on world war two, where Heisenberg decided to visit his old friend. In his visit, it was predetermined that these two were friends, but it was uncertain ha would happen in their current interaction. It was uncertain whether their old friendship will dictate the perception that each will have with each other in their current meeting of interaction.

In this visit, it was uncertain whether Heisenberg was risking his life by accepting to visit Bohr as his longtime friend. In this case, their friendship seemed to dictate how they interacted with each other, even in such a critical time of war. Therefore, this ply exemplifies that we can approximate likely consequences of interaction but cannot be sure of what will happen. Heisenberg was sure that he was risking his life against being accused of treason, although from past predetermined known vents, uncertainty was determined by what was known between Heisenberg and Bohr.