See attachment Powerpoint
1
Quantitative Analysis Project:
Assignment Overview
Social support is critical to the well-being of children and adolescents (Hughes, 2011).
Positive relationships with others promote health, self-esteem and prosocial behavior (Cohen,
Gottlieb, & Underwood, 2000). Additionally, socially supportive relationships can buffer the
harmful effects of stressful life events, such as an illness, conflict, or parental divorce. The home
and school contexts are the two primary sources of support for most children (Harter, 2012).
Unfortunately, many children do not receive the support they need from these sources
(Zelkowitz, 1987). Given the importance of social support, researchers are currently exploring
other potential sources of support in the broader community. The purpose of this study is to
explore the church as one such potential source of positive relationships, love and affirmation for
children by studying the effects of a relationship-based children’s ministry model.
Background
Every Generation Ministries (EGM) is an international non-profit organization that trains
and resources church children’s workers on six different continents. The churches in many of the
countries where EGM works lack a cohesive model for children’s ministry and tend to follow
cultural norms when ministering to children. For example, churches in Eastern Europe, which are
part of the former Soviet Bloc, are more likely to provide lecture-based instruction focused on
memorization with little opportunity for interaction or relationship-building. EGM develops
national ministry teams which provide leadership development programs and Bible teaching
resources for children’s workers in local churches.
The ministry model is focused on spiritually transforming children through innovative
instructional experiences, positive relationships with adults and peers, small group discussion,
2
and application opportunities. These pedagogical features are theorized to promote social support
transmission. Prior literature in the school context has found that positive student relationships
with adults and peers can be promoted through smaller learning communities (McNeely et al.,
2002) and the explicit teaching of prosocial behavior (Osterman, 2000), both of which are
meaningful components of the EGM model. Furthermore, child-centered teaching, comparable to
the child-focused elements of the EGM ministry model, have been associated with a greater
sense of classroom community in public schools (Solomon et al., 1996).
The Present Study
In order to evaluate whether it is accomplishing its mission, EGM initiated the Crucible
Project. The Crucible Project is an effort to apply behavioral science research methods to
evaluate and improve the ministry. In a pilot study conducted in Chile, a partner church collected
survey data from the children in its children’s program before and after receiving training and
resources and implementing the EGM children’s ministry model. The survey assessed multiple
constructs including children’s God image, prosocial behavior, and the quality of children’s
relationships with peers and adults at church. EGM and its partner church expected to see an
increase in these constructs after the implementation of the model.
Method
Participants
Survey data were collected from a mid-sized Evangelical Christian church in Chile. To
simplify data analysis for the purposes of this assignment, 10 children were randomly selected at
each of the two timepoints (before and after implementation of the EGM model). There is no
identifying information which would allow us to match children’s scores across the two
timepoints, so before and after are being treated as two separate groups. Therefore, in your final
3
presentation, please report participant information separately for each group (i.e., sample size,
percentage of boys, age range, average age). Age and sex data for the participants are provided in
the Appendix. You will need to calculate the percentage of boys, age range, and average age
using this provided information.
Measures
One of the measures used in the EGM pilot study was a Spanish translation of the received
(emotional) social support scale of the Kids’ Church Survey (Crosby & Smith, 2017). This is the
scale that will be used as the dependent variable for this assignment. The Spanish version of the
survey contains four items. The original English version of these items is as follows:
1. I tell people at church about what’s going on in my life.
2. I get to tell people at church my ideas.
3. People at church help me with my problems.
4. I tell someone from church about my feelings.
Response options range from 1 (Never) to 4 (Always). The Kids’ Church Survey was
originally developed and validated in English with a U.S. sample. The received (emotional)
support subscale demonstrated good internal reliability, was sensitive to between-church
differences related to size and ministry model, and was associated with children’s spirituality in a
sample of 6- through 14-year-olds.
Procedures
One month before training and implementation of the EGM model, surveys were
administered at a mid-sized Chilean church by local children’s workers during the regular
children’s program using a standardized protocol. Church leaders secured parental consent and
child assent before administering the surveys. Children were instructed to respond truthfully, and
4
the workers administering the survey were instructed not to influence the children’s responses.
Children responded by checking the boxes that corresponded to their response choice. These
hard copies were then placed in a sealed envelope and delivered to the local EGM office where
responses were typed into a computer spreadsheet by a paid staff member. Three months after
the children’s workers completed training and implemented the model, the survey was
readministered using the same protocol.
Data Analysis
For this assignment, you will calculate the mean received (emotional) social support
score for children in the church before and after implementation of the EGM model. You do not
need to perform any further calculations. These descriptive statistics will be presented in a table
beside an explanation of their meaning. You will also create a bar chart in which you compare
the means of the two groups and interpret the chart’s meaning.
PowerPoint Presentation
Using the provided template, you will create an APA-style PowerPoint presentation in
which you formally present the background, methodology, results, and a discussion of this study.
Provide the appropriate information on each slide drawing from the information provided in this
assignment overview, your own analysis, and your own ideas about the study’s implications and
future research possibilities. Make sure to delete the bracketed instructions from the presentation.
You may incorporate the articles cited in this assignment overview into your presentation;
however, all information must be presented in your own words. Copying and pasting entire
sentences from this assignment overview into your presentation is considered plagiarism.
5
References
Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B. H., & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social relationships and health. In
Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G. & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.), Social support measurement and
intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 3-28). Oxford Press.
Crosby, R. G., & Smith, E. I. (2017). Measuring children's church-based social support:
Development and initial validation of the Kids' Church Survey. Social Development,
26(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12198
Harter, S. (2012). Manual for the social support scale for children (Revised). University of
Denver.
Hughes, J. N. (2011). Longitudinal effects of teacher and student perceptions of teacher-student
relationship qualities on academic adjustment. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 38-
60. https://doi.org/10.1086/660686
McNeely, C. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Blum, R. W. (2002). Promoting school connectedness:
Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of School
Health, 72, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06533.x
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of
Educational Research, 70, 323-367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323
Solomon, D., Watson, M., Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Delucchi, K. (1996). Creating classrooms
that students experience as communities. American Journal of Community Psychology,
24, 719-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511032
Zelkowitz, P. (1987). Social support and aggressive behavior in young children. Family
Relations, 36, 129-134. https://doi.org/10.2307/583941
6
Appendix
Survey data collected from children at the church before training and implementation of the EGM ministry model:
Sex Age Support
Score Girl 10 1.00 Boy 10 1.50 Girl 13 1.50 Boy 6 1.25 Girl 6 1.75 Boy 6 1.25 Boy 10 1.50 Girl 10 1.00 Girl 4 1.75 Boy 11 1.50
Survey data collected from children at the church after training and implementation of the EGM ministry model:
Sex Age Support
Score Boy 10 1.00 Boy 10 2.00 Girl 10 2.25 Girl 5 1.25 Boy 9 2.00 Girl 6 1.75 Boy 5 1.75 Girl 4 2.25 Girl 10 1.25 Boy 9 3.50
Support Score Key 4 Always 3 Most of the Time 2 Sometimes 1 Never