Psychology

merlin3105
PsyClass.docx.pdf

Psy Class.docx by Merlin Ramirez

Submission date: 08-Oct-2021 11:56AM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1668806544 File name: Psy_Class.docx (6.53M) Word count: 1029 Character count: 5118

1

1

35 (Points Possible) -3 (Methods) -5.25 (Results) -2 (Writing Quality)

TOTAL SCORE = 24.75

1

1

1

1

2

-.5

1

2 -.25

-.25 3

1

1

1

1

1

1

-.54

5

-.5 6

7

-.5 89

-.25

10 -.25

1

1

1

1

1

1

12

-.25

13 -1

-2

14

15

-2

-2 16

17

36% SIMILARITY INDEX

9% INTERNET SOURCES

6% PUBLICATIONS

36% STUDENT PAPERS

1 32% 2 4%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography On

Exclude matches Off

Psy Class.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Florida International University Student Paper

Submitted to University of Westminster Student Paper

FINAL GRADE

24/35 Psy Class.docx GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

Text Comment. 35 (Points Possible)

Text Comment. -3 (Methods)

Text Comment. -5.25 (Results)

Text Comment. -2 (Writing Quality)

Text Comment. TOTAL SCORE = 24.75

PAGE 2

Text Comment. -.5

Comment 1

YOU NEED TO REPORT RELATIONSHIP STATUS HERE -.25

YOU NEED TO STATE WHERE THIS INFO CAN BE FOUND IN THE APPENDICES -.25

Comment 2

WHO? WHERE DID THIS COME FROM? -.25

Text Comment. -.25

Text Comment. -.25

Comment 3

state how many items were in this survey -.25

PAGE 3

Text Comment. -.5

Comment 4

this was supposed to be the second dv, because it came from the second survey, but for this one you were only supposed to pick 1 item and not compute from 2 -.5

Comment 5

ok this was supposed to be the first dv because it came from the first survey

Text Comment. -.5

Comment 6

two things here:

part II, part III, and parts 4 and 5 were each supposed to be described in a separate paragraph -.25

here, you need to state why we asked this question -.25

Comment 7

how were they randomly chosen?

are you sure they are all from FIU?

Text Comment. -.5

Comment 8

pretty sure we didn't let them choose which condition they wanted -.25

Comment 9

here you need more detail about what was told to them during the consent process and you have to state that they all gave verbal informed consent -.5

Text Comment. -.25

Comment 10

here, you have to use the word "debrief" -.25

Text Comment. -.25

PAGE 4

Strikethrough.

Comment 12

these numbers show up nowhere in your output -.25

Text Comment. -.25

Comment 13

this makes no sense and i have no idea where your percentages came from -1

Text Comment. -1

Text Comment. -2

Comment 14

every aspect of this is wrong...your first sentence is either incorrect or entirely unclear...you have used the AVOVA results from the other ANOVA...you did not run a Tukey post hoc, you ran a Bonferroni... you should have reported on 3 comparisons and only reported on 1... the one comparison you reported on you interpreted incorrectly -2

Comment 15

all of this is incorrect as well -2

Text Comment. -2

PAGE 5

Text Comment. -2

Comment 16

you did not tie in one of your references in the Discussion -1

your editing, especially in the Discussion was pretty bad and you have grammar issues everywhere -1

PAGE 6

Comment 17

where is this citation in your main text?

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11