Internal Environmental Analysis

Tggri2147
Project3Rubric.pdf

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 1/8

Assignments Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis

Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis

Show Assignment Information

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: Project #3 20%

BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) ZT

Criteria Equivalent to an A Equivalent to a B Equivalent to a C

Corporate-level

strategy analysis

1.2 points

Thoroughly and correctly

analyzes corporate level

strategies using BOTH research

and course material to support

reasoning.

(1.08 - 1.20)

1.02 points

Presents a corporate level

strategy analysis using some

research ANDcourse material to

support reasoning but some

development is needed.

(0.96 - 1.07)

0.9 points

Presents a corporate level

strategy analysis using some

research AND course materia

support reasoning but signifi

development is needed.

(0.84 - 0.93)

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 2/8

Create a partial SWOT

table

SW Analysis:

Create an IFE matrix

analysis and address

the strategic

inferences/implications

1 point

Thoroughly and correctly creates

a partial SWOT - SW citing the

sources from the research.

(0.9 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Creates a partial SWOT - SW

citing the sources from the

research but needs some

development OR presents less

than three strengths or

weaknesses.

(0.80 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Creates a partial SWOT - SW

citing the sources from the

research but needs significan

development OR presents les

than two strengths or

weaknesses.

(0.70- 0.79)

2.2 points

Thoroughly and correctly

performs a SW analysis and

discusses the strategic

inferences/implications/strategies

that would allow the company to

capitalize on its strengths and

strategies that would allow

company to improve upon its

major weaknesses using BOTH

research AND course material to

support reasoning.

(1.7 - 2.2)

1.6 points

Performs a SW analysis and

discusses the strategic

inferences/implications/strategies

that would allow the company to

capitalize on its strengths and

strategies that would allow

company to improve upon its

major weaknesses using BOTH

research AND course material to

support reasoning but needs

some development.

(1.5 - 1.69)

1.4 points

Performs a SW analysis and

discusses the strategic

inferences/implications/strat

that would allow the compan

capitalize on its strengths an

strategies that would allow

company to improve upon its

major weaknesses using BOT

research AND course materia

support reasoning but needs

significant development.

(1.3 - 1.49)

1 point

Thoroughly and correctly

presents an IFE matrix analysis

and address the strategic

inferences/implications using

0.85 points

Presents an IFE matrix analysis

and address the strategic

inferences/implications using

BOTH research AND course

0.75 points

Presents an IFE matrix analys

and address the strategic

inferences/implications using

BOTH research AND course

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 3/8

Develop a Grand

Strategy Matrix with an

analysis that discusses

the strategic

inferences/implications

at a corporate level and

business-unit-level

Evaluate the company's

product line and target

market

Identify and explain

BOTH research AND course

material to support reasoning. (0.9 - 1.0)

material to support reasoning but

needs some development. (0.8 - 0.89)

material to support reasoning

needs significant developme (0.7 - 0.79)

1 point

Thoroughly and correctly

develops a Grand Strategy Matrix

with an analysis that discusses

the strategic

inferences/implications at a

corporate level and business-unit-

level using BOTH research AND

course material to support

reasoning and conclusions. (0.9 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Develops a Grand Strategy Matrix

with an analysis that discusses

the strategic

inferences/implications at a

corporate level and business-unit-

level using BOTH research AND

course material to support

reasoning but needs some

development. (0.8 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Develops a Grand Strategy M

with an analysis that discusse

the strategic

inferences/implications at a

corporate level and business

level using BOTH research A

course material to support

reasoning but needs significa

development.

(0.7 - 0.79)

1.2 points

Thoroughly and correctly

evaluates company's product line

and target market using BOTH

research AND course material to

support reasoning.

(1.08 - 1.20)

1.02 points

Evaluates the company's product

line and target market using

BOTH research AND course

material to support reasoning but

needs some development.

(0.96 - 1.07)

0.9 points

Evaluates the company's pro

line and target market using

BOTH research AND course

material to support reasoning

needs significant developme

(0.84 - 0.93)

1.2 points 1.02 points 0.9 points

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 4/8

business-level

strategies

Assess the company's

org structure, org

culture marketing

production, operations,

finance/accounting,

R&D

Explain how functional-

level strategies align

with the company's

vision and mission

statements

Thoroughly and correctly

identifies and explain business-

level strategies using BOTH

research AND course material to

support reasoning.

(1.08 - 1.20)

Identifies and explains business-

level strategies using BOTH

research AND course material to

support reasoning but needs

some development.

(0.96 - 1.07)

Identifies and explains busine

level strategies using BOTH

research AND course materia

support reasoning but needs

significant development.

(0.84 - 0.93)

1 point

Thoroughly and correctly

assesses the company's org

structure, org culture, marketing

production, operations,

finance/accounting, and R&D,

using both research AND course

material to support reasoning and

conclusions.

(0.9 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Correctly assesses the company's

interactions with its stakeholders,

org structure, org culture,

marketing production, operations,

finance/accounting, and R&D

using both research AND course

material to support reasoning and

conclusions but needs clarity or

some development in using the

course material to support ideas

or in the research.

(0.8 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Attempts to assesses the

company's org structure, org

culture, marketing productio

operations, finance/accounti

and R&D providing some use

the course material AND

research to support reasonin

and conclusions but needs

significant clarity, developme

using the course material to

support ideas or in the resea

(0.7 - 0.79)

1 point

Thoroughly and correctly explains

how the functional-level

strategies align with the

company's vision and mission

statements using BOTH research

AND course material to support

reasoning and conclusions.

(0.90 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Explains how the functional-level

strategies align with the

company's vision and mission

statements using BOTH research

AND course material to support

reasoning but needs some

development.

(0.80 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Explains how the functional-

strategies align with the

company's vision and mission

statements using BOTH rese

AND course material to supp

reasoning but needs significa

development.

(0.70 - 0.79)

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 5/8

Ratio calculation and

presentation of

industry averages.

Financial analysis:

Discuss the corporate

financial standing

based on a financial

ratio analysis. Include

whether the company's

financial ratio is a

strength, a weakness or

a neutral factor.

Develop a Quantitative

Strategic Planning

Matrix (QSPM) analysis

and address the

strategic

inferences/implications.

1 point

Correctly calculates no less than a

total of ten (10) key financial

ratios for the company using only

relevant ratios for the company

and presents same industry

averages across the four

categories.

(0.90 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Calculates no less than a total of

ten (10) key financial ratios for

the company using only relevant

ratios for the company presenting

the same industry averages

across the four categories but 1-2

ratios are incorrectly presented.

(0.80 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Calculates no less than a tota

ten (10) key financial ratios fo

the company using only relev

ratios for the company prese

the same industry averages

across the four categories bu

ratios are incorrectly present

(0.70 - 0.79)

1 point

Thoroughly and correctly

performs a financial analysis and

discusses corporate financial

standing and determines whether

a strength, weakness or neutral

factor using BOTH calculations

AND course material to support

reasoning and conclusions.

(0.9 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Performs a financial analysis and

discusses corporate financial

standing and determines whether

a strength, weakness or neutral

factor using BOTH calculations

AND course material to support

reasoning but needs some

development.

(0.8 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Performs a financial analysis

discusses corporate financial

standing and determines whe

a strength, weakness or neut

factor using BOTH calculatio

AND course material to supp

reasoning but needs significa

development.

(0.7 - 0.79)

1 point

Thoroughly and correctly

develops a QSPM and addresses

the strategic

inferences/implications using

BOTH the course material AND

the Tools & Techniques

developed throughout the course

to support reasoning.

(0.9 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Develops a QSPM and addresses

the strategic

inferences/implications using

BOTH the course material AND

the Tools & Techniques

developed throughout the course

to support reasoning but needs

some development,

(0.8 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Develops a QSPM and addre

the strategic

inferences/implications using

BOTH the course material AN

the Tools & Techniques

developed throughout the co

to support reasoning but nee

significant development,

(0.7 - 0.79)

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 6/8

Develop a composite

and consistent view on

internal factor strategy

analysis based on the

qualitative and

quantitative analytical

outcomes

Attention to

Instructions

Writing Mechanics

1.2 points

Thoroughly and correctly

develops a composite and

consistent view on internal factor

strategy analysis based on the

qualitative and quantitative

analytical outcomes using BOTH

research AND course material to

support reasoning.

(1.08 - 1.20)

1.02 points

Develops a composite and

consistent view on internal factor

strategy analysis based on the

qualitative and quantitative

analytical outcomes using BOTH

research AND course material to

support reasoning but needs

some development.

(0.96 - 1.07)

0.9 points

Develops a composite and

consistent view on internal fa

strategy analysis based on th

qualitative and quantitative

analytical outcomes using BO

research AND course materia

support reasoning but needs

significant development.

(0.84 - 0.93)

2 points

The paper contains completion of all major assignment tasks including writing the report. The paper also includes completion of all minor aspects of the assignment such as third person writing, required use of course readings, outside sources if needed, and assignment format. (1.8 - 2.0)

1.7 points

The paper contains completion of all major assignment tasks including writing the report. The paper missed 1 minor aspect of the assignment such as third person writing, required use of course readings, outside sources if needed, and assignment format. (1.6 - 1.79)

1.5 points

The paper missed 1 majo assignment task (includin writing the report) or 2 m aspects of the assignmen (1.4 - 1.59)

2 points

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors,

1.7 points

Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. One to four errors found.

1.5 points

Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions English, including capitalization, punctuatio and spelling. Five to 10 errors found.

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 7/8

Total / 20

Overall Score

Submit Assignment

APA Style (6th ed.)

spelling and grammatical errors. No errors found. No contractions or jargon used. (1.8 - 2.0)

(1.6 - 1.79) (1.4 - 1.59)

1 point

No APA style or usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized. (0.9 - 1.0)

0.85 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference list but one or two APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times. (0.8 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Attempts in-text citations reference lists; APA style errors are noted througho document; Fails to use A citations when appropriat times in document. (0.7 - 0.79)

Equivalent to an A 18 points minimum

Equivalent to a B 16 points minimum

Equivalent to a C 14 points minimum

Equivalent to a D 12 points minimum

Equivalent to an F 0 points minimum

4/21/2020 Project 3: Internal Environmental Analysis - BMGT 495 6250 Strategic Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=888734&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=456311 8/8

Add a File Record Audio

Files to submit

(0) file(s) to submit

After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.

Comments

Paragraph Font Family

Font Size

Submit Cancel