MATH 201 PROJECT 1
MATH 201 – Project 1 (40 points)
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% (28 points) |
Advanced 90-100% (A) |
Proficient 70-89% (B-C) |
Developing 1-69% (< D) |
Not present |
|
Frequency Distribution (#1 & #2) (16 points) |
14.4 to 16.0 points
Correct class width, starting value, all classes the same width, no missing classes, no counting errors. All parts (frequency, midpoint, relative frequency, cumulative frequency) are present and accurate
|
11.2 to 14.3 points
Small errors noted with up to three of the following (2 pts each): class width, starting value, not all classes same width, missing classes, midpoint, relative frequency, cumulative frequency |
1 to 11.1 points
More than three errors noted of the following (2 pts each): class width, starting value, not all classes same width, missing classes, midpoint, relative frequency, cumulative frequency |
0 points
|
|
Histogram (#3) (4 points) |
3.6 to 4.0 points
Histogram correctly made with vertical bars touching each other and heights reflect the frequency distribution.
|
2.8 to 3.5 points
Histogram bars do not touch or do not exactly match the frequency distribution (but it is close) |
1 to 2.7 points
Histogram does not reflect frequency distribution or is not a histogram at all. |
0 points |
|
Ogive (#4) (4 points) |
3.6 to 4.0 points
Ogive correctly shows cumulative frequencies. The graph touches the x-axis on the left side of the data
|
2.8 to 3.5 points
Ogive shows cumulative frequencies, but the graph does not touch the x-axis the left of the data. |
1 to 2.7 points
Ogive is incorrect shape |
0 points |
|
Temperatures in error and confidence in data (#5) (4 points) |
3.6 to 4.0 points
Correctly identify states with errors and address how this affects the confidence in the validity of the data
|
2.8 to 3.5 points
Incorrectly identifies states with errors but correctly identifies how this impacts the confidence in the validity of the data
|
1 to 2.7 points
Incorrectly concludes how any errors could impact the confidence in the validity of the data |
0 points |
|
Structure 30% (12 points) |
Advanced 90-100% (A) |
Proficient 70-89% (B-C) |
Developing 1-69% (< D) |
Not present |
|
Histogram (#3) (4 points) |
3.6 to 4.0 points
Both the x and y axes are labeled in a way that describes what the histogram represents. There is also a title present that connects back to the data set. |
2.8 to 3.5 points
Either the axes are not labeled clearly or the histogram has a title such as “histogram” which does not connect back to the data set
|
1 to 2.7 points
Both that axes and the title are incomplete or missing. |
0 points |
|
Ogive (#4) (4 points) |
3.6 to 4.0 points
Both the x and y axes are labeled in a way that describes what the Ogive represents. There is also a title present that connects back to the data set. |
2.8 to 3.5 points
Either the axes are not labeled clearly or the polygon has a title such as “Ogive” which does not connect back to the data set
|
1 to 2.7 points
Both the axes and the title are incomplete or missing. |
0 points |
|
Grammar (#5) (4 points) |
3.6 to 4.0 points
Grammar is perfect. Questions are answered in complete sentences.
|
2.8 to 3.5 points
Minor grammar errors may be noted, but they do not interfere with the readability of the responses. Answers are in complete sentences.
|
1 to 2.7 points
Answers are either not in complete sentences or are full of grammar errors that impact the readability of the responses. |
0 points |