project

Relationship with Nursing

12 to >11.0 ptsExcellentTies between the chemistry topic and nursing are well explained and clear.

11 to >8.0 ptsGoodTies between the chemistry topic and nursing are explained.

8 to >4.0 ptsAverageTies between the chemistry topic and nursing are somewhat explained.

4 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementTies between the chemistry topic and nursing are not well explained.

12pts

Visuals

12 to >11.0 ptsExcellent make great use of visuals (drawings, models, short videos, ect.) to demonstrate points

11 to >9.0 ptsGoodmake use of visuals (drawings, models, short videos, ect.) to demonstrate points.

9 to >4.0 ptsAverage make some use of visuals (drawings, models, short videos, ect.) to demonstrate points.

4 to >0 ptsNeeds Imrpovement make little or no use of visuals. (E.g. PowerPoints slides that are nothing but text)

12pts

Enthusiasm and Participation

12 to >11.0 ptsExcellentAll group members participate to enthusiastically present how their chemistry topic ties to the field of nursing.

11 to >9.0 ptsGoodSome group members participate to enthusiastically present how their chemistry topic ties to the field of nursing.

9 to >4.0 ptsAverageSome group members participate presenting how their chemistry topic ties to the field of nursing.

4 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementSome group members participate present how their chemistry topic ties to the field of nursing without enthusiasm

12pts

Accuracy

12 to >11.0 ptsExcellentChemistry used is accurate and well explained. Chemistry and application are woven together well.

.

.

connected.

1 to >9.0 ptsGoodMost of the chemistry used is accurate and well explained. Chemistry and application are occasionally woven together well

9 to >4.0 ptsAverageMost of the chemistry used is accurate and well explained. Chemistry and application are not well connected

4 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementMost of the chemistry used is incorrect. Chemistry and application are not

12pts

Research

12 to >11.0 ptsExcellentTopic is well supported by APA cited sources (in line or on the same slide)

11 to >9.0 ptsGoodTopic is generally well supported by APA cited sources (in line or on the same slide)

to >4.0 ptsAverageTopic is occasionally supported by APA cited sources (in line or on the same slide

4 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementTopic is never or rarely supported by APA cited sources (in line or on the same slide).

12pts

Organization

12 to >11.0 ptsExcellentInformation is presented using clear and concise language in an organized manner.

11 to >9.0 ptsGoodIn general, information is presented using clear and concise language in an organized manner.

9 to >4.0 ptsAverageInformation is presented in an organized manner but could use improvement in the area of clarity

4 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementInformation is presented in an unorganized manner and could use improvement in the area of clarity.

12pts

Length

10 ptsExcellentPresentation is 10-15 minutes in length.

0ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation is shorter than 10 minutes or longer than 15 minutes in length

10pts

Spelling/Grammar

12 ptsExcellentNo errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

11 ptsGoodPresents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (1-5 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

11 ptsGoodPresents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (1-5 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

9 ptsAveragePresentation needs improvement in the areas of organization and clarity OR (6+ errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation)

4ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation needs improvement in the areas of organization and clarity and has 6+ errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

12pts