program eval.
Running head: PROGRAM EVALUATION PROPOSAL 1
PROGRAM EVALUATION PROPOSAL 1
PROGRAM EVALUATION PROPOSAL
Shandrika Frierson
Mississippi Valley State University
SW 650: Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Dr. Carter
April 18, 2022
PROGRAM EVALUATION PROPOSAL
Table of Contents
Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………….
Organizational Background………………………………………………………………….
Social Issue Problem Formulation…………………………………………………………..
Need Statement……………………………………………………………………………..
Goals and Objective……………………………………………………………………………..
Logic Model………………………………………………………………………………………
Research Methods and Designs………………………………………………………………..
Evaluation Discussion…………………………………………………………………………..
Sustainability (Strengths & Limitation) …………………………………………………………
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….
References………………………………………………………………………………………..
PROGRAM EVALUATION PROPOSAL
Delta Care Hope Foundation program aims to respond to the increasing numbers of homeless children, adults, and families in the Mississippi Delta area and the need for a more comprehensive approach to serving them. The agency is geared towards improving the quality of the student's educational outcomes, school attendance, social and emotional learning, and quality of life by providing a comprehensive range of services centered on the client's strengths and uniquely tailored to meet their needs. Delta Care Hope Foundation Afterschool program is an opportunity for students to reinforce classroom learning. Students who meet grade and test score eligibilities are selected after the first nine weeks of school. School district teachers and assistant teachers staff the afterschool program two to three days per week for 90-120 minutes. Afterschool staff assist students with homework and augment lessons learned during the regular school day.
Executive Summary:
Improved academic achievement.
• Enrichment services that complement the academic program.
• Family literacy and related educational development services.
Evaluation Criteria and Procedures
Our ASES program evaluation consists of two principal components. They are:
• Local evaluations that aim to find how the existing program is progressing towards
improving and strengthening its services to the students and their families. The local
Evaluation for year 2008‐2009 included the following three surveys:
o Parents’ survey.
o Students’ survey
o Administrator/staff survey
• The state‐mandated evaluation, which presents and analyzes the annual outcome‐based
data. It includes measures of academic performance and attendance throughout the
2020‐2021 academic year such as:
o Academic performance using Statewide evaluation requirement
o Teachers’ survey and analysis.