Program Development for a Government Agency

Chilly
ProgramDevelopmentforaGovernmentAgencyScoringGuide.pdf

2/29/2020 Program Development for a Government Agency Scoring Guide

https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/HMSV/HMSV5314/190400/Scoring_Guides/u07a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1

Program Development for a Government Agency Scoring Guide

Due Date: Unit 7 Percentage of Course Grade: 15%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Design a program utilizing the government as the context of practice. 20%

Does not present a program that could be implemented in a government agency.

Describes a program that could be implemented in a government agency, but does not clearly articulate that connection.

Designs a program utilizing the government as the context of practice.

Designs a program emphasizing the unique challenges and resources of the government as the context of practice.

Differentiate what the significant pieces of a community needs assessment are, to design a program in a government agency. 16%

Does not present community needs assessment information that is related to the government agency's program development.

Discusses a community needs assessment with information related to the government agency's program development, but does not articulate the linkage clearly.

Differentiates what the significant pieces of a community needs assessment are, to design a program in a government agency.

Utilizes significant pieces of a community needs assessment to design a program in a government agency.

Propose a program evaluation type appropriate for a program in a government agency. 16%

Does not present a program evaluation.

Discusses general program evaluation related to the program, but it is not specific to the context of a government agency.

Proposes a program evaluation type appropriate for a program in a government agency.

Presents an overview of a program evaluation that is appropriate for a government agency's program.

Integrate accessible and culturally sensitive approaches in a program design. 16%

Does not present a program design that addresses accessibility and cultural sensitivity.

Lists possible program design approaches that are accessible or culturally sensitive, but not both.

Integrates accessible and culturally sensitive approaches in a program design.

Develops a program for a government agency that promotes diversity and inclusion.

Examine ethical issues that arise in conducting program development. 16%

Does not present ethical issues related to conducting program development.

Describes ethical issues that are related to program development, but does not apply them to conducting program development.

Examines ethical issues that arise in conducting program development.

Examines ethical issues that arise for government agencies in conducting program development.

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. 16%

Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.

Communicates with persistent writing errors that impede the message or includes language the is not respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, is consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession, and is supported with reputable sources.