Project Charter
Running Head: PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1
Project Charter
Latasha Felder
Grantham University
April 26, 2022
Dr. Mark Malley
USDA/FSIS 2
Overview
FSIS stands for the Food Safety and Inspection Service and is accountable for ensuring the
safety of products such as poultry, eggs, meat, and Siluriform, as well as ensuring that these
products are well labeled and packaged. Authorities that enhance food safety in FSIS include the
Egg Products Inspection Act, the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the gentle handling of animals
through the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, and the Inspection Act for Poultry Products
(Muniiza et al, 2020). On the other hand, the USDA stands for the United States Department of
Agriculture which is the central administrative department that is accountable for the development
and execution of the state laws concerning food, forestry, rural economic growth, and farming. It
ensures that the requirements for food production in livestock and commercial farming are met. It
also ensures food safety, encourages agricultural production and trade, protection of natural
resources, and ensures there is no hunger in the United States as well as globally.
Business Case
FSIS is the company chosen for the study which is an agency of the USDA. This company
has an aim to the achievement of various projects in the recent years which include the HACCP-
Based Inspection Models Project (HIMP) and the FSIS retail Listeria Monocytogenes Pilot project.
Considering these two projects, they are very important and central to the company therefore there
is a need to have a scoring model that will effectively measure the extent to which the project in
this case functions. In this case, therefore, the two projects will have distinct scoring modes each.
The best model for the HIMP will be the cyber click scoring model because the project aims at
looking at a specific demographic group of people. On the other hand, the scoring model that will
be suitable for the Listeria Monocytogenes Pilot project will be the pilot lead scoring model
USDA/FSIS 3
Background
HIMP was established by the FSIS to enhance an inspection system for poultry and meat
that is efficient, flexible, and fully integrated. This system is expected to produce a rise in the
safety of foods and other merits to the consumers thus authorizing the effective deployment of
FSIS on the in-plant resources (Havazi et al, 2018). A lead scoring model is an inbound tool used
by financial advisors for marketing. Each lead is allotted a score that gets altered and updated in
time. On the other hand, the cyber click scouring model can either be based on the demographic
profile or the behavior of the lead.
Milestone Schedule
This schedule shows all the probable lead combinations. They can be grouped as cold, warm, or
hot leads. The hot leads are the most active ones, the cold leads are inactive while the warm leads
USDA/FSIS 4
are more active than cold leads although they have not attained the optimum combination of the
two constraints.
Risks, Assumptions and Constraints
There are several risks involved such as the public health impact of the influenza virus in
poultry and products such as eggs, slaughter effects on public health, lack of inspection for fish of
the order Siluriform and its impact on human health, and potential health effects linked with the
raw chicken parts. Foodborne hazards in general including the biological, chemical, and physical
risks pose a dangerous effect on human health.
Several constraints are involved with the pilot lead scoring model as well as the cyber click
scoring model. There may be a restricted scope view whereby significant measures in the process
of selection may be overlooked hence resulting in large obstacles ahead. Appropriate weighting of
criteria may also be difficult since there is a possibility of change in the significance of the criteria
as the project proceeds, hence making the reflection of the model impossible (Karolenko et al,
2020). There may be also inflexibility in decision-making based on the models since the templates
or forms used may be unattractive for creative management of the products.
Several assumptions are also involved when using the models. These include assumptions
on microbiological and inspection data as well as assumptions about the probabilities of
contracting illnesses.
Resource Estimates
Estimates in FSIS should be made to estimate the incidence of pathogens, reduce
contamination of products as well as enhance favorable policies. Analogous estimation is done
whereby previous data on the resources is used to estimate the quantity and quality of resources to
USDA/FSIS 5
be used. Previous data on FSIS will therefore be used to derive estimates on the regulated products
for FSIS used in the production process.
Stakeholders
There are various stakeholders involved such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Animal and
Plant Inspection Service, U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agencies, the U.S Government,
employees, and contractors, among others.
Team Operating Principles
There are several operating principles incorporated in FSIS. The employees should meet
the requirements for ethical conduct and embrace their responsibilities as required. The employees
should conduct themselves according to the provisions made in the Code of Federal Regulations
(Havani et al, 2018). They should maintain high levels of integrity, honesty, and impartiality. The
confidence of the citizens in the company is influenced by the employees' conduct in public.
Supervisors should ensure that employees adhere to the regulations.
Lessons Learned
Important records should be kept well for instance name of supplied materials, production
dates, dates of cleaning and sanitizing of food-contact surfaces, date and time when the raw
product is produced, among others.
Important handling measures that facilitate food safety include refrigeration of poultry
products after use, covering of poultry products that are not in use, enhancing sanitary conditions,
frequent cleaning and sanitizing of equipment used to process the products, ensuring that
USDA/FSIS 6
employees handling RTE products wear gloves, eliminating facility conditions that can result to
the alteration of products, among others.
USDA/FSIS 7
References
Hayani, H., Song, I., & Dityatev, A. (2018). Increased excitability and reduced excitatory synaptic
input into fast-spiking CA2 interneurons after enzymatic attenuation of extracellular
matrix. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 12, 149.
Karolenko, C. E., Bhusal, A., Nelson, J. L., & Muriana, P. M. (2020). Processing of biltong (dried
beef) to achieve USDA-FSIS 5-log reduction of Salmonella without a heat lethality
step. Microorganisms, 8(5), 791.
Munjiza, A., Rougier, E., Lei, Z., & Knight, E. E. (2020). FSIS: a novel fluid–solid interaction
solver for fracturing and fragmenting solids. Computational Particle Mechanics, 7(5), 789-
805.
- Overview
- FSIS stands for the Food Safety and Inspection Service and is accountable for ensuring the safety of products such as poultry, eggs, meat, and Siluriform, as well as ensuring that these products are well labeled and packaged. Authorities that enhance food safety in FSIS include the Egg Products Inspection Act, the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the gentle handling of animals through the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, and the Inspection Act for Poultry Products (Muniiza et al, 2020). On the other hand, the USDA stands for the United States Department of Agriculture which is the central administrative department that is accountable for the development and execution of the state laws concerning food, forestry, rural economic growth, and farming. It ensures that the requirements for food production in livestock and commercial farming are met. It also ensures food safety, encourages agricultural production and trade, protection of natural resources, and ensures there is no hunger in the United States as well as globally.
- Business Case